Ken Turner
Author
Ken Turner (PhD, Old Testament Theology, The Southern Baptist Theological Seminary) is Professor of Old Testament and Biblical Languages at Toccoa Falls College. His scholarly publications focus on Deuteronomy. He contributed a chapter, “How to Teach Genesis 1 at a Christian College,” in J. Daryl Charles, ed., Reading Genesis 1-2: An Evangelical Conversation (Hendrickson, 2013). Ken’s interest in origins stems from his background (including a Bachelor’s degree in Physics & Math Education, Arizona State University), his interaction with college students, and his involvement in the homeschool world (he and his wife homeschool their five children).

If Walton is Right on His Function-Only View: Some Implications
John Walton's interpretation of Genesis 1 is compelling and deservedly popular, yet some scholars have doubts about the validity of his conclusions.

- By Ken Turner
- and Brian Eisenback
Discordant Views on Concordism
The disparity in defining “concordism” is clear when reading Zondervan's Four Views on the Historical Adam, where each author is using “concordism” differently.
- By Brian Eisenback
- and Ken Turner
Christian Education and its Shortcomings: Why We Need a Fair and Balanced Approach to Origins
Too many students believe in a particular viewpoint with deep passion and emotion, but are unable to articulate their own view in detail, much less any views that differ from their own.
- By Gregg Davidson
- and Ken Turner
The Many Layers of Genesis 1
In this excerpt from their new book, geologist Gregg Davidson and theologian Ken Turner shine a spotlight on Genesis One as theologically rich literature first and foremost.

If Walton is Right on His Function-Only View: Some Implications
John Walton's interpretation of Genesis 1 is compelling and deservedly popular, yet some scholars have doubts about the validity of his conclusions.

- By Ken Turner
- and Brian Eisenback
Discordant Views on Concordism
The disparity in defining “concordism” is clear when reading Zondervan's Four Views on the Historical Adam, where each author is using “concordism” differently.
- By Brian Eisenback
- and Ken Turner
Christian Education and its Shortcomings: Why We Need a Fair and Balanced Approach to Origins
Too many students believe in a particular viewpoint with deep passion and emotion, but are unable to articulate their own view in detail, much less any views that differ from their own.
- By Gregg Davidson
- and Ken Turner
The Many Layers of Genesis 1
In this excerpt from their new book, geologist Gregg Davidson and theologian Ken Turner shine a spotlight on Genesis One as theologically rich literature first and foremost.

If Walton is Right on His Function-Only View: Some Implications
John Walton's interpretation of Genesis 1 is compelling and deservedly popular, yet some scholars have doubts about the validity of his conclusions.

- By Ken Turner
- and Brian Eisenback
Discordant Views on Concordism
The disparity in defining “concordism” is clear when reading Zondervan's Four Views on the Historical Adam, where each author is using “concordism” differently.
- By Brian Eisenback
- and Ken Turner
Christian Education and its Shortcomings: Why We Need a Fair and Balanced Approach to Origins
Too many students believe in a particular viewpoint with deep passion and emotion, but are unable to articulate their own view in detail, much less any views that differ from their own.