Karl Giberson

The world cries out for explanation at both a scientific and an emotional level, and the latter must not be reduced to the former.

Karl Giberson raises some questions and concerns regarding Albert Mohler's critique of the BioLogos Foundation.

In a time when many (like Dawkins) insist that science is corrosive to faith, Gardner reminded us that we can be enthusiastic about science without denying a reality beyond it.

The full experience of a new day is a complex mix of wonder and science. Science explains much of it, and what is left over is not so much in need of explanation as it is in need of celebration.

On the warfare view of science and Christian faith through the story of John Polkinghorne: one man who dared to cross the boundary from physics into priesthood.

Ian Barbour—arguably the first true scholar of science-and-religion—identified four ways that science and religion could relate.

The world cries out for explanation at both a scientific and an emotional level, and the latter must not be reduced to the former.

Karl Giberson raises some questions and concerns regarding Albert Mohler's critique of the BioLogos Foundation.

In a time when many (like Dawkins) insist that science is corrosive to faith, Gardner reminded us that we can be enthusiastic about science without denying a reality beyond it.