t f p g+ YouTube icon

The Broken Made Whole

Bookmark and Share

July 1, 2012 Tags: Image of God
The Broken Made Whole
Temma on Earth, 1999. 8' x 12', acrylic gesso with pigment on panel, Frye Art Museum, Seattle.

Today's entry was written by Mark Sprinkle. You can read more about what we believe here.

No one has ever seen God; but if we love one another, God lives in us and his love is made complete in us.
—1 John 4:12

As we’ve seen in recent essays (and comments) touching on Biblical scholarship, philosophy, theology, and anthropology, the imago Dei is a complicated idea, linked to the question of whether what makes humans unique among the creatures on earth is physical, cultural, spiritual, or some combination of all three. As Christians who seek to frame what the natural sciences tell us about our physical humanity with what the Bible suggests are our defining human qualities, we tend to focus on what Genesis means when it says Adam was “made in the likeness of God”; but it is helpful to remember that the first mention of God’s image in human form looked forward to the full revelation that would come in Christ. Thus, we ought also seek to understand Jesus as the model towards which Adam always pointed, and by which we should understand both Adam and ourselves.

Going one step further, we should also look forward from Jesus to the life of the Church. For if Jesus was the true image of God, then at Pentecost, the new community of believers took on the role of imaging the continuing presence of God in and for the world. The Church was constituted as the very Body of Christ, charged with making him known in their lives as well as their words. Thus in the structure and life of the Church we also see something important about the imago Dei.

Perhaps one way to hold in tension the various interpretations of the image—that is, to affirm the incomplete truths available through the relational, functional, substantial, and elective models—is to look at a literal image of the way the social aspect of imaging God via the Church interacts with the intensely individual and personal aspect of imaging God in individuals. Picking up on Kathy McReyolds’ sketch of personal transformation through encounters with those with disabilities (More than Skin Deep), I’d like to turn our attention towards the work of Chicago artist Tim Lowly, whose monumental portrait of his disabled daughter (Temma on Earth, 1999), is pictured above. Lowly’s work compels us to recognize the image of God even in one who lacks markers of those other roles, capacities, and relationships, and highlights two linked characteristics common to Jesus and Church: brokenness that does not merely equate with imperfection, and a social picture of our essential identity in Christ. By allowing Lowly to place Temma’s identity and humanity at the center of our attention, we can reframe our sense of what it means to bear the image of God and reflect the crucified Christ as his Body.

Profoundly Other

Born in North Carolina but spending his youth in South Korea (where his parents were Presbyterian missionaries), Tim Lowly attended Calvin College and began work as an artist in Michigan. But his life and work took an unexpected turn in 1985, when Tim and his wife Sherrie’s daughter was born and suffered a medical emergency during her first two days home from the hospital. In 2002, journalist Fred Camper’s incredibly sensitive article treated the Lowlys’ physical, emotional and spiritual journey with Temma at length, and I encourage readers to turn to that essay for the full narrative background to Tim’s approach to his daughter and his art. But the central facts are that for all of her now 27 years, Temma’s host of physical and mental disabilities have made her completely dependent on others, and have meant that the relationship she has with her parents (and they with her) is a radical departure from ‘normal.’ Temma’s “profound otherness” challenges most of our expectations about the human capacity to image God. Speaking to Camper, Lowly describes Temma:

It's unlikely that she thinks in a way that we would call thinking," he says, "because our ways of thinking are based so much on learning, experience, sight, socialization, and history, and I doubt any of those things have any bearing on Temma. I don't even think comparing her to animals makes sense. There's a certain wholeness to the way animals think that I don't think Temma is capable of. I'm pretty sure she does have an inner life, but I don't think she has the mental mechanisms that would make it correspond in an understandable way to the way we think.

And yet Lowly has produced hundreds of paintings and other works that feature Temma, some of them monumental in scale, none of them shying away from questions of the purpose, value, and meaning of her life for their family, and for ever-widening circles of community. Certainly there is a political component to Lowly’s work that addresses inequity in culture and church. Generally, he says, the church has been compassionate, but “nearly always from perspective of the able-bodied and the ‘whole’ vs. the disabled, never mind that none of us measure up to complete wholeness.” Yet his work also reflects the way Temma, in her “otherness,” creates community. Artist-in-residence and gallery director at Northpark University since the mid-1990s, Lowly has often made Temma a physical presence in the studio and classroom. Carry Me, 2002 (drawing on panel, 108" x 48," at left) depicts students from an advanced class holding Temma, but they were also involved completing the project. Another large work, Culture of Adoration, 2008, shows Temma as the model in a drawing class, with Lowly drawing the parallel between that scene and the adoration of the Magi at Jesus’ birth. That comparison pictures the way a community forms around loving attention and worship, but subverts artistic and cultural expectations that only what is beautiful should be valued. Lowly notes that while Temma is often alone, in some ways she’s never alone: “She’s cared for by her parents, but that relationship extends out to a much broader church outside her family.” Both paintings, then, are images of Christ’s corporate body as much as they are of Temma or the painting students who carry and draw her.

What bearing, then, does Lowly’s particular way of seeing and depicting his daughter have on us, on our sense of the imago Dei? Part of his ongoing artistic project is to understand and interrogate the way the traditions of perspective in Western art and culture presuppose and privilege the individual, solitary and unified point of view as the most important, the most true. In the wake of modernist emphases on self-expression in art, Lowly also sees value in pursuing ways of working that bring out the meditative (and even prayerful) craft aspect of painting, and that at least partially de-emphasize his and other artists’ subjective positions. He increasingly works from photographs (and collages of many individual pictures), and has more and more sought to bring collaboration into the making of his work. When Lowly takes Temma as his subject, these features of his practice emphasize the way that, in the Church, our individual identity is experienced as a tension between brokenness and wholeness in the Body.

Broken Together

There is a sense in which we look at Temma and we want to affirm that she is made in the image of God by denying that the image of God has anything to do with her physical, material body. Indeed, one way to approach the problem made visible through Lowly’s painting is to imagine the soul as imparted to (or trapped in) the physical frame. This certainly fits with saying that the image-bearing role of humanity in general is an act of the grace of God, not something dependent on our abilities. But in the election model, we are reminded that God didn’t call Abraham just to a “spiritual” identity, but also to physically constitute a people sent into the very concrete physical world.

Likewise, if we recognize Jesus as our model for the image of God, we will not deny the physicality of the human experience, nor the incarnation, nor even Christ's suffering on our account. Indeed, we must affirm the goodness of creation and our physicality, even—especially—in its brokenness because Jesus, himself, was broken. Even after the resurrection, his wounds were not abolished or erased, but remained tangible marks by which the Lord revealed himself every bit as much as he did in his creative and healing power. And in the Revelation image of the victorious Christ, we have another picture of that essential and persistent sacrificial brokenness in the Lamb who appeared “as if slain.”

What of the Church? Similarly, the Church remains a fragmented whole when it is at its best—broken open to be dispersed into the world. And though it is also all-too-often broken by own individual and corporate sin, even that finds its meaning and redemption in the image of bread broken in the Lord’s Supper—the way that sharing brokenness together unites the individuals in a congregation with each other and with Christ. As a reminder of Jesus’ own individual body, communion addresses both of those senses; it is the means of both healing and sending.

Christ’s commission to the Church, then, presents a profoundly social model of being the continuing revelation of God for the world. We bear the image of God together, and the image of God is only fully realized when we are members of a community, in relation to other human beings (even if that relationship is one of complete dependence), as opposed to seeking independence. This does not and ought not compromise the absolute worth of each individual, but should remind us that part of our worth is tied up in our integration with the whole body of Christ.

One last example of Lowly’s work gives iconic form to this inter-relation between image-bearing, self, identity, and the community of the Church. Made to commemorate Temma’s 25th birthday in 2010, At 25(right, and below), is a collaborative piece constructed of 25 individual, two-sided panel blocks that fit together something like a puzzle. On one side is a black and white portrait of Temma, while on the reverse, the individual blocks have been painted and gilded in different patterns and techniques. Lowly constructed the piece, but sent each block out to be completed by 30 different artists, either working alone or in pairs. In requesting them to do their sections of the composite portrait in an “artistically neutral” style, he was asking them to subjugate their artistic personae and self-expression to the depiction of Temma. Not every artist was able to do that to the same extent, so the final object is an image of the imperfection of our self-giving—or our inability to see others without looking through our own particular lenses of self—even while being a testament to the compassion and care of Lowly’s dispersed community.

Most importantly for this discussion, At 25 suggests that our image-bearing of God does not rest on our individual “fitness,” much less how well we “fit in.” Rather, it is carried by the whole human community, most fully in the broken Body of Christ. In this respect, brokenness is not something to be corrected; it is something that makes the particular community of the Church possible. Individuals may not be able to fulfill or even recognize the functional aspects of the imago Dei, they may not even be capable of the relational aspects—or of returning expressions of love or kindness or thanks, or even awareness. But the whole body, the beloved community, the nation God set apart for himself and the world, is called to be the image of God for each of us—precisely when we can’t.

Tim Lowly is Assistant Professor of Art at Northpark University. An inter-disciplinary artist, he works with painting, drawing, installation, digital media, photography and music: both individually and collaboratively. His work has a lyrical realism and quiet spirituality that have contributed over the last thirty years to the development of a international reputation. While Tim’s art and music address a variety of subjects, the central pillar of his work has been his daughter Temma who is, in his words, “profoundly other”. The clinical diagnoses of “multiple impairment” or “spastic quadriplegia” do little to address the compelling presence of this young woman and the way her being and essence have shaped her father’s work.

Lowly was born in Hendersonville, North Carolina in 1958. The son of medical missionaries, he spent most of his youth in South Korea. He attended Calvin College and received a BFA degree in 1981. His wife Sherrie Lowly is a United Methodist Pastor. They reside in Chicago, Illinois. Since 1994 Tim has been affiliated with North Park University in Chicago as professor, gallery director, and artist-in-residence. Tim is represented by Koplin Del Rio Gallery in Los Angeles.

For additional information (including exhibitions and collections) see Tim’s personal website.

All images © Tim Lowly.

Mark Sprinkle is an artist and cultural historian, and was formerly Senior Web Editor and Senior Fellow of Arts and Humanities for The BioLogos Foundation. A phi beta kappa graduate of Georgetown University, he received his M.A. and Ph.D. in American Studies from the College of William and Mary, where he studied how artworks embody complex relationships in different cultural contexts. Since 1996 he has been an independent artist and frame-maker, also regularly writing and speaking on the role of creative practices in cultural mediation and renewal, especially in the area of science and Christian faith. Mark and his wife Beth home-schooled their three boys, and are active in the local home-school community in Richmond, Virginia.

View the archived discussion of this post

This article is now closed for new comments. The archived comments are shown below.

Page 1 of 1   1
Roger A. Sawtelle - #70796

July 2nd 2012

Thank God for Tim, Temma, and Sherrie.

IMHO this beautiful story confirms the relational basis of the Image of God.  It reminds us that we are all broken in one way or another, to one degree of another, and it is only by the grace of God that we are who we are. 

It reminds us that we are all dependent on others and others depend on us.  It is really not how whole we are, how smart, how well off, how respectable, how “successful” we are, but how we relate to others that matters to God. 

Only in our brokeness can we understand what wholeness is.  Only in our brokeness can we understand others who are also broken.  Only in our brokeness can we understand God, and that is why we are afraid of people who are differently abled, the poor, “strange,” and different.  

Of course we are called to live by faith and not by sight and not by fear.  We are called to live in right relationship of concern and love for all and be fulfilled in the God’s Image.


wesseldawn - #70801

July 2nd 2012

Our uniqueness from the animals is a spiritual one only: we have a spirit (God’s image), they do not (at least not in the same way)! We are animal (man, Gen. 2:7) that later got a spirit when it entered the garden (Gen. 2:8).

We are mammal where did we get that from? Pheromones and hormones dictate much of our behaviour - as it does the animals. We humans have a tendency to run in packs with Alpha males and females leading the way!

The difference between us and the other animals is because we have a spirit, it makes us ‘moral’, whereas the other animals are not moral, only instinctive. Without a spirit, we too would be only instinctive.

It’s only because we have a spirit that we can communicate with God and the spiritual realm. If we did not have it, would/could not have one spiritual thought! The other animals do not pray or go to church because they never got God’s image - only Adam - and we all the descendants of this one animal.

wesseldawn - #70802

July 2nd 2012

Sorry - I didn’t mean to sound as if I undervalue the story of Temma.

Obviously Temma is important, though not seeming to be a part of family in the traditional manner, yet doubtless integral to it.

Here I see the beauty and sacrifice of nurture despite the fact that there is no response from Temma. And there too is the difference between human and animal as an animal will kill or abandon its imperfect offspring! 

At the same time though, I have heard of humans that act like animals and animals that act like humans!

schweiz - #71080

July 13th 2012

Lately I have been contemplating the concept of what God means by creating us in the imago Dei found in Genesis 1:27 “God created humankind in his image, in the image of God he created them; male and female he created them” (NRSV). There is much discussion on this topic without a consensus due to the nature of its complexity. Throughout theological history the imago Dei has been viewed from different angles, such as the vocational view (witnessed in our Christian community’s acts of love toward people and nature), the structural view (characteristics in us that represent God), the relational view (our relationship before God), and the dynamic view (the sanctification process of becoming like God).

As I have been reading on my own different scholars on the imago Dei, a picture had been forming in my head about what it means to be created in the image of God. From Nancey Murphy’s book Bodies and Souls, or Spirited Bodies? and Joel Green’s book Body, Soul, and Human Life, I learned more about how our bodies are physically designed to have the higher capacities for consciousness, memory, morality, and relationships with God and others. From David B. Perrin’s book Studying Christian Spirituality,I have been learning that the imago Dei is about being a faith-filled community as individuals are dynamically involved in loving the world. The verses that came to mind that fit my forming picture was, “I praise you, for I am fearfully and wonderfully made…” (NRSV, Ps. 139:14a) and that we are a “chosen race, a royal priesthood, a holy nation, God’s own people, in order that you may proclaim the mighty acts of him who called you out of darkness into his marvelous light” (NRSV, 1 Pt 2:9).

I thought I was beginning to grasp what the imago Dei phrase could have meant, that is until I read Mark Sprinkle’s review, titled “The Broken Made Whole,” on artist Tim Lowly. Lowly is an artist who has made his disabled daughter Temma the center of several of his portraits. Temma has had a diminished mental and physical capacity from infancy. Sprinkle writes, “Temma’s ‘profound otherness’ challenges most of our expectations about the human capacity to image God.” Now I have the question of what if a person does not have the higher human capacities that are said to reflect the image of God? Sprinkle helped me realize through Lowly’s artwork that my mental picture of the imago Dei, just like the church today, has operated from an assumed wholeness, rather than brokenness.

The two artworks highlighted by Sprinkle effectively bring out Lowly’s themes of brokenness and community. In the first portrait, Temma on Earth, 1999, Temma is painted in varying shades of gray except for the flesh color for her face while laying alone on the desert floor. Temma’s body blends in with the desert background, perhaps commenting on her lack of recognition in society. She is laying by a crack in the earth symbolizing both the brokenness in that part of the desert and her body. What I found most interesting is Lowly’s choice of the desert background. The desert is often seen as a landscape that is lacking, but if you talk with anyone who lives in the desert, they will describe it subtlely full of life and beauty.

In the other portrait Carry Me, 2002, Temma is painted from above while being held by Lowly’s own art students. The portrait even has a deeper experiential meaning in that each of his students also contributed to painting the portrait. Lowly is putting into image one of the communities that cares for Temma. When an observer looks at the portrait, you first see a group of people carrying a person who is unable to move independently. Then when the observer learns about the subject and who is doing the carrying, one begins to wonder who is truly ministering to whom. Is it really Lowly’s art students or is it Temma herself?

[continued in next comment entry]

schweiz - #71081

July 13th 2012

[continued from previous comment entry]

By placing Temma as a subject for the audience to face, Lowly invites people to think at a deeper level and challenges their definition of the meaning of life, what it means to be human, and what it means to connect with God. Sprinkle reminds us that our imago Dei is not based on how well we function in the body of Christ, but on how our imago Dei “is carried by the whole human community, most fully in the broken body of Christ.” This view of imago Dei reminds me of when artists create a larger picture out of hundreds or thousands of smaller pictures. When the picture is seen from afar the smaller pictures diminish into creating the scene of the primary picture. Lowly challenges us through his artwork of Temma to reevaluate the different historical angles of the definition of the imago Dei in light of our imperfections as being an essential part of Christ’s body.

Page 1 of 1   1