Would those genuinely interested in learning about evolution benefit from a careful explanation of why these common objections don’t hold water? Here the answer seemed to me to be “yes.”
  • Intelligent Design and Common Ancestry, Part 1

    | Dennis Venema
    Blog Post
    Intelligent Design and Common Ancestry, Part 1 | Dennis Venema

    Would those genuinely interested in learning about evolution benefit from a careful explanation of why these common objections don’t hold water? Here the answer seemed to me to ... Read More >

    Going Deeper PART 1 of 4
  • Intelligent Design and Common Ancestry, Part 2

    | Dennis Venema
    Blog Post
    Intelligent Design and Common Ancestry, Part 2 | Dennis Venema

    Having 99.4% identical coding sequences, humans and chimpanzees, in the vast majority of cases, use the same codons in the same order even when alternatives exist. Read More >

    Going Deeper PART 2 of 4
  • Intelligent Design and Common Ancestry, Part 3

    | Dennis Venema
    Blog Post
    Intelligent Design and Common Ancestry, Part 3 | Dennis Venema

    If the designer was able to make fruit fly genomes that distinct, why was it not possible to achieve the same distinction between humans and chimpanzees? Read More >

    Going Deeper PART 3 of 4
  • Intelligent Design and Common Ancestry, Part 4

    | Dennis Venema
    Blog Post
    Intelligent Design and Common Ancestry, Part 4 | Dennis Venema

    These lines of evidence converge on a single conclusion: we share ancestry with other apes. Read More >

    Going Deeper PART 4 of 4