<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0"
  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
  xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
  xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
  xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
  xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">

  <channel>
        <title>Custom Feed &#45; The BioLogos Forum</title>
    <link>http://biologos.org/resources/find/Essay/any/Sermons,Pastoral Voices,Non&#45;Believers/sort&#45;by&#45;Newest?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</link>
    <description>This is a custom feed of BioLogos resources. Make a new feed at http://biologos.org/resources/find</description>
    <dc:language>en</dc:language>
    <dc:rights>Copyright 2013</dc:rights>
    <dc:date>2013-06-18T17:48:27-08:00</dc:date>    
    
    

            
            
        
      <item>
        <title>Creation, Evolution, and Christian Laypeople</title>
        <link>http://biologos.org/essays/concerns&#45;of&#45;the&#45;typical&#45;parishonerquot&#45;or&#45;quotcreation&#45;evolution&#45;and&#45;christ?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</link>
        <guid>http://biologos.org/essays/concerns&#45;of&#45;the&#45;typical&#45;parishonerquot&#45;or&#45;quotcreation&#45;evolution&#45;and&#45;christ?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</guid>
        <description>In this paper, Keller considers three main clusters of questions lay people raise when they learn of anyone teaching that biological evolution and biblical orthodoxy can be compatible. Keller offers some ideas on how to provide responses that take these concerns seriously.</description>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[In this paper, Keller considers three main clusters of questions lay people raise when they learn of anyone teaching that biological evolution and biblical orthodoxy can be compatible. Keller offers some ideas on how to provide responses that take these concerns seriously.]]></content:encoded>
        <pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 11 18:17:57 -0700</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>Tim Keller</dc:creator>
        <!--<dc:date>Apr 25, 2011 18:17</dc:date>-->
      </item>
            <item>
        <title>Scientific Fundamentalism and its Cultural Impact</title>
        <link>http://biologos.org/essays/scientific&#45;fundamentalism&#45;and&#45;its&#45;cultural&#45;impact?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</link>
        <guid>http://biologos.org/essays/scientific&#45;fundamentalism&#45;and&#45;its&#45;cultural&#45;impact?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</guid>
        <description>Giberson&apos;s essay makes the case that scientific fundamentalists are not merely arguing for the supremacy of science but also presenting science as a quasi&#45;religious replacement. The agenda of the &quot;New Atheists&quot; is not merely to refute mainstream religion but to replace it. Unfortunately, the scientific community is poorly represented by these aggressive public figures.</description>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[Giberson's essay makes the case that scientific fundamentalists are not merely arguing for the supremacy of science but also presenting science as a quasi-religious replacement. The agenda of the "New Atheists" is not merely to refute mainstream religion but to replace it. Unfortunately, the scientific community is poorly represented by these aggressive public figures.]]></content:encoded>
        <pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 11 17:35:35 -0700</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>Karl Giberson</dc:creator>
        <!--<dc:date>Apr 25, 2011 17:35</dc:date>-->
      </item>
      

      

    
  </channel>
</rss>