<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0"
  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
  xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
  xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
  xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
  xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">

  <channel>
        <title>Custom Feed &#45; The BioLogos Forum</title>
    <link>http://biologos.org/resources/find/Essay/any/Scientists,Genesis/sort&#45;by&#45;Newest?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</link>
    <description>This is a custom feed of BioLogos resources. Make a new feed at http://biologos.org/resources/find</description>
    <dc:language>en</dc:language>
    <dc:rights>Copyright 2013</dc:rights>
    <dc:date>2013-06-19T18:19:30-08:00</dc:date>    
    
    

            
            
        
      <item>
        <title>Seeking a Signature</title>
        <link>http://biologos.org/essays/seeking&#45;a&#45;signature?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</link>
        <guid>http://biologos.org/essays/seeking&#45;a&#45;signature?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</guid>
        <description>In this article, Venema offers his review of Stephen Meyer&apos;s book Signature in the Cell.</description>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[In this article, Venema offers his review of Stephen Meyer's book <em>Signature in the Cell</em>.]]></content:encoded>
        <pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 11 15:14:01 -0700</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>Dennis Venema</dc:creator>
        <!--<dc:date>Oct 19, 2011 15:14</dc:date>-->
      </item>
            <item>
        <title>Evolution and the Origin of Biological Information</title>
        <link>http://biologos.org/essays/evolution&#45;and&#45;the&#45;origin&#45;of&#45;biological&#45;information?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</link>
        <guid>http://biologos.org/essays/evolution&#45;and&#45;the&#45;origin&#45;of&#45;biological&#45;information?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</guid>
        <description>In this paper, Venema explores several examples in biology where random mutation and natural selection have indeed led to substantial increases in biological information. The question of how new specified information arises in DNA, far from being an “enigma”, is one of great interest to biologists.</description>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[In this paper, Venema explores several examples in biology where random mutation and natural selection have indeed led to substantial increases in biological information. The question of how new specified information arises in DNA, far from being an “enigma”, is one of great interest to biologists. ]]></content:encoded>
        <pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 11 14:48:05 -0700</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>Dennis Venema</dc:creator>
        <!--<dc:date>Oct 19, 2011 14:48</dc:date>-->
      </item>
            <item>
        <title>Evolutionary Creation: A Christian Approach to Evolution</title>
        <link>http://biologos.org/essays/evolutionary&#45;creation&#45;a&#45;christian&#45;approach&#45;to&#45;evolution?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</link>
        <guid>http://biologos.org/essays/evolutionary&#45;creation&#45;a&#45;christian&#45;approach&#45;to&#45;evolution?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</guid>
        <description>Professor Denis Lamoureux presents the theory of evolutionary creation, which claims that the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit created the universe and life through an ordained, sustained, and design&#45;reflecting evolutionary process. The view of origins, says Lamoureux, fully embraces both the religious beliefs of biblical Christianity and the scientific theories of cosmological, geological, and biological evolution.</description>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[Professor Denis Lamoureux presents the theory of evolutionary creation, which claims that the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit created the universe and life through an ordained, sustained, and design-reflecting evolutionary process. The view of origins, says Lamoureux, fully embraces both the religious beliefs of biblical Christianity and the scientific theories of cosmological, geological, and biological evolution.]]></content:encoded>
        <pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 11 18:35:05 -0700</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>Denis Lamoureux</dc:creator>
        <!--<dc:date>Apr 25, 2011 18:35</dc:date>-->
      </item>
            <item>
        <title>The Biblical Creation in its Ancient Near Eastern Context</title>
        <link>http://biologos.org/essays/the&#45;biblical&#45;creation&#45;in&#45;its&#45;ancient&#45;near&#45;eastern&#45;context?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</link>
        <guid>http://biologos.org/essays/the&#45;biblical&#45;creation&#45;in&#45;its&#45;ancient&#45;near&#45;eastern&#45;context?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</guid>
        <description>&quot;As a Christian and a biblical scholar, I care both about Scripture as truth and about the ongoing scholarly conversation regarding the composition of the Hebrew Scriptures.  And so, when I was asked to speak on the story of creation in Genesis 1, I welcomed the opportunity to give my thoughts on the interaction between this text and its ancient Near Eastern context.&quot;</description>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA["As a Christian and a biblical scholar, I care both about Scripture as truth and about the ongoing scholarly conversation regarding the composition of the Hebrew Scriptures.  And so, when I was asked to speak on the story of creation in Genesis 1, I welcomed the opportunity to give my thoughts on the interaction between this text and its ancient Near Eastern context."]]></content:encoded>
        <pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 11 18:33:35 -0700</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>Joseph Lam</dc:creator>
        <!--<dc:date>Apr 25, 2011 18:33</dc:date>-->
      </item>
            <item>
        <title>Engaging Today&apos;s Militant Atheist Arguments</title>
        <link>http://biologos.org/essays/engaging&#45;todays&#45;militant&#45;atheist&#45;arguments?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</link>
        <guid>http://biologos.org/essays/engaging&#45;todays&#45;militant&#45;atheist&#45;arguments?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</guid>
        <description>In this paper, MIT professor Ian Hutchinson addresses the question of how to engage arguments put forward by the New Atheists. In doing so, he offers a critique of scientism, the assumption that scientific knowledge is all the real knowledge there is.</description>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[In this paper, MIT professor Ian Hutchinson addresses the question of how to engage arguments put forward by the New Atheists. In doing so, he offers a critique of <em>scientism</em>, the assumption that scientific knowledge is all the real knowledge there is.]]></content:encoded>
        <pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 11 18:14:01 -0700</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>Ian Hutchinson</dc:creator>
        <!--<dc:date>Apr 25, 2011 18:14</dc:date>-->
      </item>
            <item>
        <title>Scientific Fundamentalism and its Cultural Impact</title>
        <link>http://biologos.org/essays/scientific&#45;fundamentalism&#45;and&#45;its&#45;cultural&#45;impact?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</link>
        <guid>http://biologos.org/essays/scientific&#45;fundamentalism&#45;and&#45;its&#45;cultural&#45;impact?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</guid>
        <description>Giberson&apos;s essay makes the case that scientific fundamentalists are not merely arguing for the supremacy of science but also presenting science as a quasi&#45;religious replacement. The agenda of the &quot;New Atheists&quot; is not merely to refute mainstream religion but to replace it. Unfortunately, the scientific community is poorly represented by these aggressive public figures.</description>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[Giberson's essay makes the case that scientific fundamentalists are not merely arguing for the supremacy of science but also presenting science as a quasi-religious replacement. The agenda of the "New Atheists" is not merely to refute mainstream religion but to replace it. Unfortunately, the scientific community is poorly represented by these aggressive public figures.]]></content:encoded>
        <pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 11 17:35:35 -0700</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>Karl Giberson</dc:creator>
        <!--<dc:date>Apr 25, 2011 17:35</dc:date>-->
      </item>
            <item>
        <title>Recovering the Doctrine of Creation: A Theological View of Science</title>
        <link>http://biologos.org/essays/recovering&#45;the&#45;doctrine&#45;of&#45;creation&#45;a&#45;theological&#45;view&#45;of&#45;science?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</link>
        <guid>http://biologos.org/essays/recovering&#45;the&#45;doctrine&#45;of&#45;creation&#45;a&#45;theological&#45;view&#45;of&#45;science?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</guid>
        <description>Philosopher Robert Bishop explores the Biblical doctrine of creation, which he describes as &quot;perhaps one of the most helpful pieces of theology for thinking about science&quot;, and describes why the doctrine needs to be recovered from narrower, contemporary interpretations of creation.</description>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[Philosopher Robert Bishop explores the Biblical doctrine of creation, which he describes as "perhaps one of the most helpful pieces of theology for thinking about science", and describes why the doctrine needs to be recovered from narrower, contemporary interpretations of creation.]]></content:encoded>
        <pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 11 16:43:49 -0700</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>Robert C. Bishop</dc:creator>
        <!--<dc:date>Apr 25, 2011 16:43</dc:date>-->
      </item>
            <item>
        <title>How Does a BioLogos model need to address the theological issues</title>
        <link>http://biologos.org/essays/how&#45;does&#45;a&#45;biologos&#45;model&#45;need&#45;to&#45;address&#45;the&#45;theological&#45;issues?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</link>
        <guid>http://biologos.org/essays/how&#45;does&#45;a&#45;biologos&#45;model&#45;need&#45;to&#45;address&#45;the&#45;theological&#45;issues?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</guid>
        <description>Science and Religion scholar Denis Alexander presents two models for relating Adam and Eve with the findings of contemporary anthropology. This essay was presented at the November 2010 Theology of Celebration Workshop</description>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[Science and Religion scholar Denis Alexander presents two models for relating Adam and Eve with the findings of contemporary anthropology. This essay was presented at the November 2010 Theology of Celebration Workshop]]></content:encoded>
        <pubDate>Fri, 22 Apr 11 17:13:49 -0700</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>Denis Alexander</dc:creator>
        <!--<dc:date>Apr 22, 2011 17:13</dc:date>-->
      </item>
      

      

    
  </channel>
</rss>