<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0"
  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
  xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
  xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
  xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
  xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">

  <channel>
        <title>Custom Feed &#45; The BioLogos Forum</title>
    <link>http://biologos.org/resources/find/Essay/any/Science Teachers,Old Earth Creationism,Non&#45;Believers/sort&#45;by&#45;Newest?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</link>
    <description>This is a custom feed of BioLogos resources. Make a new feed at http://biologos.org/resources/find</description>
    <dc:language>en</dc:language>
    <dc:rights>Copyright 2013</dc:rights>
    <dc:date>2013-05-24T10:20:44-08:00</dc:date>    
    
    

            
            
        
      <item>
        <title>Genesis and the Genome</title>
        <link>http://biologos.org/essays/genesis&#45;and&#45;the&#45;genome?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</link>
        <guid>http://biologos.org/essays/genesis&#45;and&#45;the&#45;genome?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</guid>
        <description>This article provides an overview of genomics evidence for common ancestry and hominid population sizes, and briefly discusses the implications of these lines of evidence for scientific concordist approaches to the Genesis narratives.</description>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[This article provides an overview of genomics evidence for common ancestry and hominid population sizes, and briefly discusses the implications of these lines of evidence for scientific concordist approaches to the Genesis narratives.]]></content:encoded>
        <pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 11 15:09:09 -0700</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>Dennis Venema</dc:creator>
        <!--<dc:date>Oct 19, 2011 15:09</dc:date>-->
      </item>
            <item>
        <title>Science as an Instrument of Worship</title>
        <link>http://biologos.org/essays/science&#45;as&#45;an&#45;instrument&#45;of&#45;worship?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</link>
        <guid>http://biologos.org/essays/science&#45;as&#45;an&#45;instrument&#45;of&#45;worship?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</guid>
        <description>NASA astronomer Jennifer Wiseman asserts that studying creation can show us the nature of God; science can inform us of what we need to do as stewards of God&amp;rsquo;s creation; understanding the natural world gives us a deeper knowledge of Jesus Christ; and science can give us a better understanding of ourselves. This essay was presented at the November 2009 Theology of Celebration Workshop.</description>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[NASA astronomer Jennifer Wiseman asserts that studying creation can show us the nature of God; science can inform us of what we need to do as stewards of God&rsquo;s creation; understanding the natural world gives us a deeper knowledge of Jesus Christ; and science can give us a better understanding of ourselves. This essay was presented at the November 2009 Theology of Celebration Workshop.]]></content:encoded>
        <pubDate>Mon, 02 May 11 19:10:34 -0700</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>Jennifer Wiseman</dc:creator>
        <!--<dc:date>May 02, 2011 19:10</dc:date>-->
      </item>
            <item>
        <title>An Evangelical Geneticist&apos;s Critique of Reasons to Believe&apos;s Testable Creation Model</title>
        <link>http://biologos.org/essays/an&#45;evangelical&#45;geneticists&#45;critique&#45;of&#45;reasons&#45;to&#45;believes&#45;testable&#45;creatio?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</link>
        <guid>http://biologos.org/essays/an&#45;evangelical&#45;geneticists&#45;critique&#45;of&#45;reasons&#45;to&#45;believes&#45;testable&#45;creatio?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</guid>
        <description>Biologist and BioLogos Senior Fellow Denis Venema examines the interaction between RTB literature and several lines of genetics&#45;based evidence for common ancestry. In so doing, he also addresses the scientific robustness and reliability of the RTB model.</description>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[Biologist and BioLogos Senior Fellow Denis Venema examines the interaction between RTB literature and several lines of genetics-based evidence for common ancestry. In so doing, he also addresses the scientific robustness and reliability of the RTB model.]]></content:encoded>
        <pubDate>Mon, 02 May 11 19:02:57 -0700</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>Dennis Venema</dc:creator>
        <!--<dc:date>May 02, 2011 19:02</dc:date>-->
      </item>
            <item>
        <title>Scientific Fundamentalism and its Cultural Impact</title>
        <link>http://biologos.org/essays/scientific&#45;fundamentalism&#45;and&#45;its&#45;cultural&#45;impact?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</link>
        <guid>http://biologos.org/essays/scientific&#45;fundamentalism&#45;and&#45;its&#45;cultural&#45;impact?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</guid>
        <description>Giberson&apos;s essay makes the case that scientific fundamentalists are not merely arguing for the supremacy of science but also presenting science as a quasi&#45;religious replacement. The agenda of the &quot;New Atheists&quot; is not merely to refute mainstream religion but to replace it. Unfortunately, the scientific community is poorly represented by these aggressive public figures.</description>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[Giberson's essay makes the case that scientific fundamentalists are not merely arguing for the supremacy of science but also presenting science as a quasi-religious replacement. The agenda of the "New Atheists" is not merely to refute mainstream religion but to replace it. Unfortunately, the scientific community is poorly represented by these aggressive public figures.]]></content:encoded>
        <pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 11 17:35:35 -0700</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>Karl Giberson</dc:creator>
        <!--<dc:date>Apr 25, 2011 17:35</dc:date>-->
      </item>
            <item>
        <title>Christian Geologists on Noah’s Flood: Biblical and Scientific Shortcomings of Flood Geology</title>
        <link>http://biologos.org/essays/christian&#45;geologists&#45;on&#45;noahs&#45;flood&#45;biblical&#45;and&#45;scientific&#45;shortcomings&#45;of?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</link>
        <guid>http://biologos.org/essays/christian&#45;geologists&#45;on&#45;noahs&#45;flood&#45;biblical&#45;and&#45;scientific&#45;shortcomings&#45;of?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</guid>
        <description>Geologists Davidson and Wolgemuth address the widely promulgated notion that the Flood can account for the earth’s complex geology, and that all genuine Christians should accept this viewpoint.</description>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[Geologists Davidson and Wolgemuth address the widely promulgated notion that the Flood can account for the earth’s complex geology, and that all genuine Christians should accept this viewpoint.]]></content:encoded>
        <pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 11 17:09:05 -0700</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>Gregg Davidson and Ken Wolgemuth</dc:creator>
        <!--<dc:date>Apr 25, 2011 17:09</dc:date>-->
      </item>
            <item>
        <title>Recovering the Doctrine of Creation: A Theological View of Science</title>
        <link>http://biologos.org/essays/recovering&#45;the&#45;doctrine&#45;of&#45;creation&#45;a&#45;theological&#45;view&#45;of&#45;science?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</link>
        <guid>http://biologos.org/essays/recovering&#45;the&#45;doctrine&#45;of&#45;creation&#45;a&#45;theological&#45;view&#45;of&#45;science?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</guid>
        <description>Philosopher Robert Bishop explores the Biblical doctrine of creation, which he describes as &quot;perhaps one of the most helpful pieces of theology for thinking about science&quot;, and describes why the doctrine needs to be recovered from narrower, contemporary interpretations of creation.</description>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[Philosopher Robert Bishop explores the Biblical doctrine of creation, which he describes as "perhaps one of the most helpful pieces of theology for thinking about science", and describes why the doctrine needs to be recovered from narrower, contemporary interpretations of creation.]]></content:encoded>
        <pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 11 16:43:49 -0700</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>Robert C. Bishop</dc:creator>
        <!--<dc:date>Apr 25, 2011 16:43</dc:date>-->
      </item>
      

      

    
  </channel>
</rss>