<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0"
  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
  xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
  xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
  xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
  xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">

  <channel>
        <title>Custom Feed &#45; The BioLogos Forum</title>
    <link>http://biologos.org/resources/find/Essay/any/Science &amp; Worldviews,Image of God,Old Earth Creationism/sort&#45;by&#45;Newest?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</link>
    <description>This is a custom feed of BioLogos resources. Make a new feed at http://biologos.org/resources/find</description>
    <dc:language>en</dc:language>
    <dc:rights>Copyright 2013</dc:rights>
    <dc:date>2013-05-21T16:42:07-08:00</dc:date>    
    
    

            
            
        
      <item>
        <title>An Evangelical Geneticist&apos;s Critique of Reasons to Believe&apos;s Testable Creation Model</title>
        <link>http://biologos.org/essays/an&#45;evangelical&#45;geneticists&#45;critique&#45;of&#45;reasons&#45;to&#45;believes&#45;testable&#45;creatio?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</link>
        <guid>http://biologos.org/essays/an&#45;evangelical&#45;geneticists&#45;critique&#45;of&#45;reasons&#45;to&#45;believes&#45;testable&#45;creatio?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</guid>
        <description>Biologist and BioLogos Senior Fellow Denis Venema examines the interaction between RTB literature and several lines of genetics&#45;based evidence for common ancestry. In so doing, he also addresses the scientific robustness and reliability of the RTB model.</description>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[Biologist and BioLogos Senior Fellow Denis Venema examines the interaction between RTB literature and several lines of genetics-based evidence for common ancestry. In so doing, he also addresses the scientific robustness and reliability of the RTB model.]]></content:encoded>
        <pubDate>Mon, 02 May 11 19:02:57 -0700</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>Dennis Venema</dc:creator>
        <!--<dc:date>May 02, 2011 19:02</dc:date>-->
      </item>
            <item>
        <title>Accommodationist and Proud of It</title>
        <link>http://biologos.org/essays/accommodationist&#45;and&#45;proud&#45;of&#45;it?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</link>
        <guid>http://biologos.org/essays/accommodationist&#45;and&#45;proud&#45;of&#45;it?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</guid>
        <description>Science and religion scholar Michael Ruse gives a personal account of his experiences as an author and public speaker on the compatibility of Christianity and biological evolution.</description>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[Science and religion scholar Michael Ruse gives a personal account of his experiences as an author and public speaker on the compatibility of Christianity and biological evolution.]]></content:encoded>
        <pubDate>Mon, 02 May 11 18:53:59 -0700</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>Michael Ruse</dc:creator>
        <!--<dc:date>May 02, 2011 18:53</dc:date>-->
      </item>
            <item>
        <title>How Does the BioLogos Model Need to Address Concerns About Science?</title>
        <link>http://biologos.org/essays/how&#45;does&#45;the&#45;biologos&#45;model&#45;need&#45;to&#45;address&#45;concerns&#45;about&#45;science?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</link>
        <guid>http://biologos.org/essays/how&#45;does&#45;the&#45;biologos&#45;model&#45;need&#45;to&#45;address&#45;concerns&#45;about&#45;science?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</guid>
        <description>Many barriers to the acceptance of the BioLogos model by evangelical Christians arise from popular misconceptions about the nature of science and its relationship to God&apos;s action in our world.</description>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[Many barriers to the acceptance of the BioLogos model by evangelical Christians arise from popular misconceptions about the nature of science and its relationship to God's action in our world.]]></content:encoded>
        <pubDate>Mon, 02 May 11 18:42:01 -0700</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>Ard Louis</dc:creator>
        <!--<dc:date>May 02, 2011 18:42</dc:date>-->
      </item>
            <item>
        <title>Engaging Today&apos;s Militant Atheist Arguments</title>
        <link>http://biologos.org/essays/engaging&#45;todays&#45;militant&#45;atheist&#45;arguments?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</link>
        <guid>http://biologos.org/essays/engaging&#45;todays&#45;militant&#45;atheist&#45;arguments?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</guid>
        <description>In this paper, MIT professor Ian Hutchinson addresses the question of how to engage arguments put forward by the New Atheists. In doing so, he offers a critique of scientism, the assumption that scientific knowledge is all the real knowledge there is.</description>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[In this paper, MIT professor Ian Hutchinson addresses the question of how to engage arguments put forward by the New Atheists. In doing so, he offers a critique of <em>scientism</em>, the assumption that scientific knowledge is all the real knowledge there is.]]></content:encoded>
        <pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 11 18:14:01 -0700</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>Ian Hutchinson</dc:creator>
        <!--<dc:date>Apr 25, 2011 18:14</dc:date>-->
      </item>
            <item>
        <title>Scientific Fundamentalism and its Cultural Impact</title>
        <link>http://biologos.org/essays/scientific&#45;fundamentalism&#45;and&#45;its&#45;cultural&#45;impact?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</link>
        <guid>http://biologos.org/essays/scientific&#45;fundamentalism&#45;and&#45;its&#45;cultural&#45;impact?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</guid>
        <description>Giberson&apos;s essay makes the case that scientific fundamentalists are not merely arguing for the supremacy of science but also presenting science as a quasi&#45;religious replacement. The agenda of the &quot;New Atheists&quot; is not merely to refute mainstream religion but to replace it. Unfortunately, the scientific community is poorly represented by these aggressive public figures.</description>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[Giberson's essay makes the case that scientific fundamentalists are not merely arguing for the supremacy of science but also presenting science as a quasi-religious replacement. The agenda of the "New Atheists" is not merely to refute mainstream religion but to replace it. Unfortunately, the scientific community is poorly represented by these aggressive public figures.]]></content:encoded>
        <pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 11 17:35:35 -0700</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>Karl Giberson</dc:creator>
        <!--<dc:date>Apr 25, 2011 17:35</dc:date>-->
      </item>
            <item>
        <title>Recovering the Doctrine of Creation: A Theological View of Science</title>
        <link>http://biologos.org/essays/recovering&#45;the&#45;doctrine&#45;of&#45;creation&#45;a&#45;theological&#45;view&#45;of&#45;science?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</link>
        <guid>http://biologos.org/essays/recovering&#45;the&#45;doctrine&#45;of&#45;creation&#45;a&#45;theological&#45;view&#45;of&#45;science?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</guid>
        <description>Philosopher Robert Bishop explores the Biblical doctrine of creation, which he describes as &quot;perhaps one of the most helpful pieces of theology for thinking about science&quot;, and describes why the doctrine needs to be recovered from narrower, contemporary interpretations of creation.</description>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[Philosopher Robert Bishop explores the Biblical doctrine of creation, which he describes as "perhaps one of the most helpful pieces of theology for thinking about science", and describes why the doctrine needs to be recovered from narrower, contemporary interpretations of creation.]]></content:encoded>
        <pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 11 16:43:49 -0700</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>Robert C. Bishop</dc:creator>
        <!--<dc:date>Apr 25, 2011 16:43</dc:date>-->
      </item>
            <item>
        <title>What Scientists Do</title>
        <link>http://biologos.org/essays/what&#45;scientists&#45;do?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</link>
        <guid>http://biologos.org/essays/what&#45;scientists&#45;do?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</guid>
        <description>In this scholarly essay, Steve Benner, a Distinguished Fellow of The Foundation for Applied Molecular Evolution in Gainesville, Fla., looks at what the role of a scientist should be. Benner looks specifically at &quot;falsifiability&quot;, the acceptance of uncertainty, and the place of the scientist in public discourse.</description>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[In this scholarly essay, Steve Benner, a Distinguished Fellow of The Foundation for Applied Molecular Evolution in Gainesville, Fla., looks at what the role of a scientist should be. Benner looks specifically at "falsifiability", the acceptance of uncertainty, and the place of the scientist in public discourse.]]></content:encoded>
        <pubDate>Fri, 22 Apr 11 17:22:27 -0700</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>Steven Benner</dc:creator>
        <!--<dc:date>Apr 22, 2011 17:22</dc:date>-->
      </item>
      

      

    
  </channel>
</rss>