<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0"
  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
  xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
  xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
  xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
  xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">

  <channel>
        <title>Custom Feed &#45; The BioLogos Forum</title>
    <link>http://biologos.org/resources/find/Essay/any/Pastors,Genetics,Fossils/sort&#45;by&#45;Newest?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</link>
    <description>This is a custom feed of BioLogos resources. Make a new feed at http://biologos.org/resources/find</description>
    <dc:language>en</dc:language>
    <dc:rights>Copyright 2013</dc:rights>
    <dc:date>2013-05-18T19:25:05-08:00</dc:date>    
    
    

            
            
        
      <item>
        <title>Genesis and the Genome</title>
        <link>http://biologos.org/essays/genesis&#45;and&#45;the&#45;genome?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</link>
        <guid>http://biologos.org/essays/genesis&#45;and&#45;the&#45;genome?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</guid>
        <description>This article provides an overview of genomics evidence for common ancestry and hominid population sizes, and briefly discusses the implications of these lines of evidence for scientific concordist approaches to the Genesis narratives.</description>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[This article provides an overview of genomics evidence for common ancestry and hominid population sizes, and briefly discusses the implications of these lines of evidence for scientific concordist approaches to the Genesis narratives.]]></content:encoded>
        <pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 11 15:09:09 -0700</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>Dennis Venema</dc:creator>
        <!--<dc:date>Oct 19, 2011 15:09</dc:date>-->
      </item>
            <item>
        <title>Understanding Adam</title>
        <link>http://biologos.org/essays/understanding&#45;adam?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</link>
        <guid>http://biologos.org/essays/understanding&#45;adam?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</guid>
        <description>In this paper, Pete Enns looks at from a unique angle to some: Adam is the beginning of Israel, not humanity. He follows through with how this line of thinking affects our reading of the Genesis account.</description>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[In this paper, Pete Enns looks at from a unique angle to some: Adam is the beginning of Israel, not humanity. He follows through with how this line of thinking affects our reading of the Genesis account.]]></content:encoded>
        <pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 11 13:33:48 -0700</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>Pete Enns</dc:creator>
        <!--<dc:date>Oct 19, 2011 13:33</dc:date>-->
      </item>
            <item>
        <title>&quot;Come and See&quot;: A Christological Invitation for Science</title>
        <link>http://biologos.org/essays/come&#45;and&#45;see?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</link>
        <guid>http://biologos.org/essays/come&#45;and&#45;see?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</guid>
        <description>This chapter from Mark Noll&apos;s book Jesus Christ and the Life of the Mind seeks to understand science through a Christ&#45;centered lens.  Overall, if one accepts that nature is created and sustained by Jesus Christ, the author explains, then one must conclude that looking at nature is, in fact, the best way to learn about nature.</description>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[This chapter from Mark Noll's book <em>Jesus Christ and the Life of the Mind</em> seeks to understand science through a Christ-centered lens.  Overall, if one accepts that nature is created and sustained by Jesus Christ, the author explains, then one must conclude that looking at nature is, in fact, the best way to learn about nature.]]></content:encoded>
        <pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 11 12:43:35 -0700</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>Mark Noll</dc:creator>
        <!--<dc:date>Oct 19, 2011 12:43</dc:date>-->
      </item>
            <item>
        <title>The Collapsing Universe in the Bible</title>
        <link>http://biologos.org/essays/the&#45;collapsing&#45;universe&#45;in&#45;the&#45;bible?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</link>
        <guid>http://biologos.org/essays/the&#45;collapsing&#45;universe&#45;in&#45;the&#45;bible?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</guid>
        <description>In this essay, Godawa argues that the decreation language of a collapsing universe with falling stars and signs in the heavens was actually symbolic discourse about world&#45;changing events and powers related to the end of the old covenant and the coming of the new covenant as God’s “new world order.” In this interpretation, predictions of the collapsing universe were figuratively fulfilled in the historic past of the first century.</description>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[In this essay, Godawa argues that the decreation language of a collapsing universe with falling stars and signs in the heavens was actually symbolic discourse about world-changing events and powers related to the end of the old covenant and the coming of the new covenant as God’s “new world order.” In this interpretation, predictions of the collapsing universe were figuratively fulfilled in the historic past of the first century.]]></content:encoded>
        <pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 11 12:25:42 -0700</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>Brian Godawa</dc:creator>
        <!--<dc:date>Oct 19, 2011 12:25</dc:date>-->
      </item>
            <item>
        <title>Science as an Instrument of Worship</title>
        <link>http://biologos.org/essays/science&#45;as&#45;an&#45;instrument&#45;of&#45;worship?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</link>
        <guid>http://biologos.org/essays/science&#45;as&#45;an&#45;instrument&#45;of&#45;worship?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</guid>
        <description>NASA astronomer Jennifer Wiseman asserts that studying creation can show us the nature of God; science can inform us of what we need to do as stewards of God&amp;rsquo;s creation; understanding the natural world gives us a deeper knowledge of Jesus Christ; and science can give us a better understanding of ourselves. This essay was presented at the November 2009 Theology of Celebration Workshop.</description>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[NASA astronomer Jennifer Wiseman asserts that studying creation can show us the nature of God; science can inform us of what we need to do as stewards of God&rsquo;s creation; understanding the natural world gives us a deeper knowledge of Jesus Christ; and science can give us a better understanding of ourselves. This essay was presented at the November 2009 Theology of Celebration Workshop.]]></content:encoded>
        <pubDate>Mon, 02 May 11 19:10:34 -0700</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>Jennifer Wiseman</dc:creator>
        <!--<dc:date>May 02, 2011 19:10</dc:date>-->
      </item>
            <item>
        <title>Barriers to Accepting Creation by an Evolutionary Process: Concerns of the Evangelical Theologian</title>
        <link>http://biologos.org/essays/barriers&#45;to&#45;accepting&#45;creation&#45;by&#45;an&#45;evolutionary&#45;process&#45;I?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</link>
        <guid>http://biologos.org/essays/barriers&#45;to&#45;accepting&#45;creation&#45;by&#45;an&#45;evolutionary&#45;process&#45;I?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</guid>
        <description>Renowned Old Testament scholar Bruce Waltke considers eleven barriers that prevent evangelical theologians from accepting evolution as a possible means of creation and what these barriers tell us about the tensions perceived by many Evangelicals between science and faith. Waltke&apos;s work was based on a survey sent to members of the Fellowship of Evangelical Seminary Presidents and their faculty.</description>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[Renowned Old Testament scholar Bruce Waltke considers eleven barriers that prevent evangelical theologians from accepting evolution as a possible means of creation and what these barriers tell us about the tensions perceived by many Evangelicals between science and faith. Waltke's work was based on a survey sent to members of the Fellowship of Evangelical Seminary Presidents and their faculty.]]></content:encoded>
        <pubDate>Mon, 02 May 11 19:04:27 -0700</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>Bruce Waltke</dc:creator>
        <!--<dc:date>May 02, 2011 19:04</dc:date>-->
      </item>
            <item>
        <title>Metaphor, Mystery, and Paradox at the Confluence of Science and Faith</title>
        <link>http://biologos.org/essays/metaphor&#45;mystery&#45;and&#45;paradox&#45;at&#45;the&#45;confluence&#45;of&#45;science&#45;and&#45;faith?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</link>
        <guid>http://biologos.org/essays/metaphor&#45;mystery&#45;and&#45;paradox&#45;at&#45;the&#45;confluence&#45;of&#45;science&#45;and&#45;faith?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</guid>
        <description>Artist and BioLogos Senior Fellow Mark Sprinkle considers the role mystery plays in both science and faith, and why basing one&apos;s faith purely on reason in fact contributes to a rationalist view of the world rejected by many Christians.</description>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[Artist and BioLogos Senior Fellow Mark Sprinkle considers the role mystery plays in both science and faith, and why basing one's faith purely on reason in fact contributes to a rationalist view of the world rejected by many Christians.]]></content:encoded>
        <pubDate>Mon, 02 May 11 19:00:40 -0700</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>Mark Sprinkle</dc:creator>
        <!--<dc:date>May 02, 2011 19:00</dc:date>-->
      </item>
            <item>
        <title>Faithful Poetics and Christian Knowledge of the World</title>
        <link>http://biologos.org/essays/faithful&#45;poetics&#45;and&#45;christian&#45;knowledge&#45;of&#45;the&#45;world?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</link>
        <guid>http://biologos.org/essays/faithful&#45;poetics&#45;and&#45;christian&#45;knowledge&#45;of&#45;the&#45;world?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</guid>
        <description>Artist and BioLogos Senior Fellow Mark Sprinkle describes the importance of acknowledging the creative and subjective aspects of human knowledge in the midst of the debates about the relationship between science and faith.</description>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[Artist and BioLogos Senior Fellow Mark Sprinkle describes the importance of acknowledging the creative and subjective aspects of human knowledge in the midst of the debates about the relationship between science and faith.]]></content:encoded>
        <pubDate>Mon, 02 May 11 18:59:47 -0700</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>Mark Sprinkle</dc:creator>
        <!--<dc:date>May 02, 2011 18:59</dc:date>-->
      </item>
            <item>
        <title>Evangelicals, Creation, and Scripture: An Overview</title>
        <link>http://biologos.org/essays/evangelicals&#45;creation&#45;and&#45;scripture&#45;an&#45;overview?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</link>
        <guid>http://biologos.org/essays/evangelicals&#45;creation&#45;and&#45;scripture&#45;an&#45;overview?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</guid>
        <description>Mark Noll, historian and author of The Scandal of the Evangelical Mind, enumerates 15 attitudes, assumptions, and convictions he considers to be most influential in inciting anti&#45;intellectual sentiment among evangelical Christians.</description>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[Mark Noll, historian and author of <em>The Scandal of the Evangelical Mind</em>, enumerates 15 attitudes, assumptions, and convictions he considers to be most influential in inciting anti-intellectual sentiment among evangelical Christians.]]></content:encoded>
        <pubDate>Mon, 02 May 11 18:50:53 -0700</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>Mark Noll</dc:creator>
        <!--<dc:date>May 02, 2011 18:50</dc:date>-->
      </item>
            <item>
        <title>Human Evolution in Theological Context</title>
        <link>http://biologos.org/essays/human&#45;evolution&#45;in&#45;theological&#45;context?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</link>
        <guid>http://biologos.org/essays/human&#45;evolution&#45;in&#45;theological&#45;context?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</guid>
        <description>In this scholarly paper, physicist, theologian, and minister George Murphy offers a theological look at human evolution and the implications it has for Christianity.</description>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[In this scholarly paper, physicist, theologian, and minister George Murphy offers a theological look at human evolution and the implications it has for Christianity.]]></content:encoded>
        <pubDate>Mon, 02 May 11 18:46:30 -0700</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>George Murphy</dc:creator>
        <!--<dc:date>May 02, 2011 18:46</dc:date>-->
      </item>
            <item>
        <title>The Cambrian &apos;Explosion&apos;, Transitional Forms, and the Tree of Life</title>
        <link>http://biologos.org/essays/the&#45;cambrian&#45;explosion&#45;transitional&#45;forms&#45;and&#45;the&#45;tree&#45;of&#45;life?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</link>
        <guid>http://biologos.org/essays/the&#45;cambrian&#45;explosion&#45;transitional&#45;forms&#45;and&#45;the&#45;tree&#45;of&#45;life?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</guid>
        <description>Geologist Keith Miller examines the &quot;Cambrian Explosion&quot;, a period of rapid evolutionary diversification approximately 575 million years ago, and whether it poses a challenge to evolutionary theory.</description>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[Geologist Keith Miller examines the "Cambrian Explosion", a period of rapid evolutionary diversification approximately 575 million years ago, and whether it poses a challenge to evolutionary theory.]]></content:encoded>
        <pubDate>Mon, 02 May 11 18:45:49 -0700</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>Keith Miller</dc:creator>
        <!--<dc:date>May 02, 2011 18:45</dc:date>-->
      </item>
            <item>
        <title>The Biblical Creation in its Ancient Near Eastern Context</title>
        <link>http://biologos.org/essays/the&#45;biblical&#45;creation&#45;in&#45;its&#45;ancient&#45;near&#45;eastern&#45;context?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</link>
        <guid>http://biologos.org/essays/the&#45;biblical&#45;creation&#45;in&#45;its&#45;ancient&#45;near&#45;eastern&#45;context?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</guid>
        <description>&quot;As a Christian and a biblical scholar, I care both about Scripture as truth and about the ongoing scholarly conversation regarding the composition of the Hebrew Scriptures.  And so, when I was asked to speak on the story of creation in Genesis 1, I welcomed the opportunity to give my thoughts on the interaction between this text and its ancient Near Eastern context.&quot;</description>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA["As a Christian and a biblical scholar, I care both about Scripture as truth and about the ongoing scholarly conversation regarding the composition of the Hebrew Scriptures.  And so, when I was asked to speak on the story of creation in Genesis 1, I welcomed the opportunity to give my thoughts on the interaction between this text and its ancient Near Eastern context."]]></content:encoded>
        <pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 11 18:33:35 -0700</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>Joseph Lam</dc:creator>
        <!--<dc:date>Apr 25, 2011 18:33</dc:date>-->
      </item>
            <item>
        <title>Creation, Evolution, and Christian Laypeople</title>
        <link>http://biologos.org/essays/concerns&#45;of&#45;the&#45;typical&#45;parishonerquot&#45;or&#45;quotcreation&#45;evolution&#45;and&#45;christ?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</link>
        <guid>http://biologos.org/essays/concerns&#45;of&#45;the&#45;typical&#45;parishonerquot&#45;or&#45;quotcreation&#45;evolution&#45;and&#45;christ?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</guid>
        <description>In this paper, Keller considers three main clusters of questions lay people raise when they learn of anyone teaching that biological evolution and biblical orthodoxy can be compatible. Keller offers some ideas on how to provide responses that take these concerns seriously.</description>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[In this paper, Keller considers three main clusters of questions lay people raise when they learn of anyone teaching that biological evolution and biblical orthodoxy can be compatible. Keller offers some ideas on how to provide responses that take these concerns seriously.]]></content:encoded>
        <pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 11 18:17:57 -0700</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>Tim Keller</dc:creator>
        <!--<dc:date>Apr 25, 2011 18:17</dc:date>-->
      </item>
            <item>
        <title>Engaging Today&apos;s Militant Atheist Arguments</title>
        <link>http://biologos.org/essays/engaging&#45;todays&#45;militant&#45;atheist&#45;arguments?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</link>
        <guid>http://biologos.org/essays/engaging&#45;todays&#45;militant&#45;atheist&#45;arguments?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</guid>
        <description>In this paper, MIT professor Ian Hutchinson addresses the question of how to engage arguments put forward by the New Atheists. In doing so, he offers a critique of scientism, the assumption that scientific knowledge is all the real knowledge there is.</description>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[In this paper, MIT professor Ian Hutchinson addresses the question of how to engage arguments put forward by the New Atheists. In doing so, he offers a critique of <em>scientism</em>, the assumption that scientific knowledge is all the real knowledge there is.]]></content:encoded>
        <pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 11 18:14:01 -0700</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>Ian Hutchinson</dc:creator>
        <!--<dc:date>Apr 25, 2011 18:14</dc:date>-->
      </item>
            <item>
        <title>The How of Creation: Parameters for Gracious and Fruitful Dialogue</title>
        <link>http://biologos.org/essays/the&#45;how&#45;of&#45;creation&#45;parameters&#45;and&#45;nodes&#45;for&#45;gracious&#45;and&#45;fruitful&#45;dialogue?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</link>
        <guid>http://biologos.org/essays/the&#45;how&#45;of&#45;creation&#45;parameters&#45;and&#45;nodes&#45;for&#45;gracious&#45;and&#45;fruitful&#45;dialogue?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</guid>
        <description>Hastings provides a biblical and theological basis for healthy and fruitful dialogue on the theology and science of origins.</description>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[Hastings provides a biblical and theological basis for healthy and fruitful dialogue on the theology and science of origins.]]></content:encoded>
        <pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 11 18:13:55 -0700</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>Ross Hastings</dc:creator>
        <!--<dc:date>Apr 25, 2011 18:13</dc:date>-->
      </item>
            <item>
        <title>Mesopotamian Cosmic Geography in the Bible</title>
        <link>http://biologos.org/essays/mesopotamian&#45;cosmic&#45;geography&#45;in&#45;the&#45;bible?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</link>
        <guid>http://biologos.org/essays/mesopotamian&#45;cosmic&#45;geography&#45;in&#45;the&#45;bible?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</guid>
        <description>Brian Godawa looks at several aspects of ancient cosmography (descriptions of the universe) that also appear in the Bible, and what these aspects of the text mean for our understanding of Scripture.</description>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[Brian Godawa looks at several aspects of ancient cosmography (descriptions of the universe) that also appear in the Bible, and what these aspects of the text mean for our understanding of Scripture.]]></content:encoded>
        <pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 11 17:55:57 -0700</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>Brian Godawa</dc:creator>
        <!--<dc:date>Apr 25, 2011 17:55</dc:date>-->
      </item>
            <item>
        <title>Adventist Origins of Young Earth Creationism</title>
        <link>http://biologos.org/essays/adventist&#45;origins&#45;of&#45;young&#45;earth&#45;creationism?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</link>
        <guid>http://biologos.org/essays/adventist&#45;origins&#45;of&#45;young&#45;earth&#45;creationism?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</guid>
        <description>Many evangelicals believe that Young Earth Creationism is the only authentic, biblical way for Christians to understand origins, and that until the advent of Darwin&apos;s theory of evolution, it was the only view held by Christians. However, in this excerpt from Saving Darwin, Karl Giberson explains that Young Earth Creationism&apos;s origins are surprisingly recent.</description>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[Many evangelicals believe that Young Earth Creationism is the only authentic, biblical way for Christians to understand origins, and that until the advent of Darwin's theory of evolution, it was the <em>only</em> view held by Christians. However, in this excerpt from <em>Saving Darwin</em>, Karl Giberson explains that Young Earth Creationism's origins are surprisingly recent. ]]></content:encoded>
        <pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 11 17:36:54 -0700</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>Karl Giberson</dc:creator>
        <!--<dc:date>Apr 25, 2011 17:36</dc:date>-->
      </item>
            <item>
        <title>Concerns of the Typical Agnostic Scientist</title>
        <link>http://biologos.org/essays/concerns&#45;of&#45;the&#45;typical&#45;agnostic&#45;scientist?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</link>
        <guid>http://biologos.org/essays/concerns&#45;of&#45;the&#45;typical&#45;agnostic&#45;scientist?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</guid>
        <description>Falk&apos;s paper asks evangelical Christians to explore whether they are propping up a bubble that they, not God, have created, thereby isolating themselves from the world of academics. The essay describes five layers that may play a role in unnecessarily blocking entry, or reentry, of agnostic scientists into the realm of evangelicalism.</description>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[Falk's paper asks evangelical Christians to explore whether they are propping up a bubble that they, not God, have created, thereby isolating themselves from the world of academics. The essay describes five layers that may play a role in unnecessarily blocking entry, or reentry, of agnostic scientists into the realm of evangelicalism. ]]></content:encoded>
        <pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 11 17:17:59 -0700</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>Darrel Falk</dc:creator>
        <!--<dc:date>Apr 25, 2011 17:17</dc:date>-->
      </item>
            <item>
        <title>An Incarnational Model of Scripture</title>
        <link>http://biologos.org/essays/preliminary&#45;observations&#45;on&#45;an&#45;incarnational&#45;model&#45;of&#45;scripture&#45;its&#45;viabili?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</link>
        <guid>http://biologos.org/essays/preliminary&#45;observations&#45;on&#45;an&#45;incarnational&#45;model&#45;of&#45;scripture&#45;its&#45;viabili?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</guid>
        <description>The Bible is no more a book dropped out of the sky than Jesus is some superman who flew down from heaven. Instead, just as Jesus is “God incarnate,” both divine and human, the Bible is a book that speaks God’s word and reflects the thoughts, ideas, and worldviews of the human authors.</description>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[The Bible is no more a book dropped out of the sky than Jesus is some superman who flew down from heaven. Instead, just as Jesus is “God incarnate,” both divine and human, the Bible is a book that speaks God’s word <em>and</em> reflects the thoughts, ideas, and worldviews of the human authors.]]></content:encoded>
        <pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 11 17:15:29 -0700</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>Pete Enns</dc:creator>
        <!--<dc:date>Apr 25, 2011 17:15</dc:date>-->
      </item>
            <item>
        <title>Christian Geologists on Noah’s Flood: Biblical and Scientific Shortcomings of Flood Geology</title>
        <link>http://biologos.org/essays/christian&#45;geologists&#45;on&#45;noahs&#45;flood&#45;biblical&#45;and&#45;scientific&#45;shortcomings&#45;of?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</link>
        <guid>http://biologos.org/essays/christian&#45;geologists&#45;on&#45;noahs&#45;flood&#45;biblical&#45;and&#45;scientific&#45;shortcomings&#45;of?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</guid>
        <description>Geologists Davidson and Wolgemuth address the widely promulgated notion that the Flood can account for the earth’s complex geology, and that all genuine Christians should accept this viewpoint.</description>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[Geologists Davidson and Wolgemuth address the widely promulgated notion that the Flood can account for the earth’s complex geology, and that all genuine Christians should accept this viewpoint.]]></content:encoded>
        <pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 11 17:09:05 -0700</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>Gregg Davidson and Ken Wolgemuth</dc:creator>
        <!--<dc:date>Apr 25, 2011 17:09</dc:date>-->
      </item>
      

      

    
  </channel>
</rss>