<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0"
  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
  xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
  xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
  xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
  xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">

  <channel>
        <title>Custom Feed &#45; The BioLogos Forum</title>
    <link>http://biologos.org/resources/find/Essay/any/Christianity &amp; Science &#45; Then and Now,Science &amp; Worldviews,Non&#45;Believers/sort&#45;by&#45;Newest?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</link>
    <description>This is a custom feed of BioLogos resources. Make a new feed at http://biologos.org/resources/find</description>
    <dc:language>en</dc:language>
    <dc:rights>Copyright 2013</dc:rights>
    <dc:date>2013-05-21T22:58:57-08:00</dc:date>    
    
    

            
            
        
      <item>
        <title>&quot;Come and See&quot;: A Christological Invitation for Science</title>
        <link>http://biologos.org/essays/come&#45;and&#45;see?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</link>
        <guid>http://biologos.org/essays/come&#45;and&#45;see?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</guid>
        <description>This chapter from Mark Noll&apos;s book Jesus Christ and the Life of the Mind seeks to understand science through a Christ&#45;centered lens.  Overall, if one accepts that nature is created and sustained by Jesus Christ, the author explains, then one must conclude that looking at nature is, in fact, the best way to learn about nature.</description>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[This chapter from Mark Noll's book <em>Jesus Christ and the Life of the Mind</em> seeks to understand science through a Christ-centered lens.  Overall, if one accepts that nature is created and sustained by Jesus Christ, the author explains, then one must conclude that looking at nature is, in fact, the best way to learn about nature.]]></content:encoded>
        <pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 11 12:43:35 -0700</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>Mark Noll</dc:creator>
        <!--<dc:date>Oct 19, 2011 12:43</dc:date>-->
      </item>
            <item>
        <title>Accommodationist and Proud of It</title>
        <link>http://biologos.org/essays/accommodationist&#45;and&#45;proud&#45;of&#45;it?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</link>
        <guid>http://biologos.org/essays/accommodationist&#45;and&#45;proud&#45;of&#45;it?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</guid>
        <description>Science and religion scholar Michael Ruse gives a personal account of his experiences as an author and public speaker on the compatibility of Christianity and biological evolution.</description>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[Science and religion scholar Michael Ruse gives a personal account of his experiences as an author and public speaker on the compatibility of Christianity and biological evolution.]]></content:encoded>
        <pubDate>Mon, 02 May 11 18:53:59 -0700</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>Michael Ruse</dc:creator>
        <!--<dc:date>May 02, 2011 18:53</dc:date>-->
      </item>
            <item>
        <title>Science, Religion, and A. D. White: Seeking Peace in the &apos;Warfare Between Science and Theology&apos;</title>
        <link>http://biologos.org/essays/science&#45;religion&#45;and&#45;a.&#45;d.&#45;white&#45;seeking&#45;peace&#45;in&#45;the&#45;warfare&#45;between&#45;scien?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</link>
        <guid>http://biologos.org/essays/science&#45;religion&#45;and&#45;a.&#45;d.&#45;white&#45;seeking&#45;peace&#45;in&#45;the&#45;warfare&#45;between&#45;scien?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</guid>
        <description>Mark Noll, historian and author of The Scandal of the Evangelical Mind, describes how Andrew Dickson White relentlessly advocated a view of history in which Science and Dogmatic Theology have always been at war with one another.  Noll identifies 16 reasons why White’s notion of warfare is mistaken.</description>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[Mark Noll, historian and author of <em>The Scandal of the Evangelical Mind</em>, describes how Andrew Dickson White relentlessly advocated a view of history in which Science and Dogmatic Theology have always been at war with one another.  Noll identifies 16 reasons why White’s notion of warfare is mistaken.]]></content:encoded>
        <pubDate>Mon, 02 May 11 18:49:01 -0700</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>Mark Noll</dc:creator>
        <!--<dc:date>May 02, 2011 18:49</dc:date>-->
      </item>
            <item>
        <title>How Does the BioLogos Model Need to Address Concerns About Science?</title>
        <link>http://biologos.org/essays/how&#45;does&#45;the&#45;biologos&#45;model&#45;need&#45;to&#45;address&#45;concerns&#45;about&#45;science?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</link>
        <guid>http://biologos.org/essays/how&#45;does&#45;the&#45;biologos&#45;model&#45;need&#45;to&#45;address&#45;concerns&#45;about&#45;science?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</guid>
        <description>Many barriers to the acceptance of the BioLogos model by evangelical Christians arise from popular misconceptions about the nature of science and its relationship to God&apos;s action in our world.</description>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[Many barriers to the acceptance of the BioLogos model by evangelical Christians arise from popular misconceptions about the nature of science and its relationship to God's action in our world.]]></content:encoded>
        <pubDate>Mon, 02 May 11 18:42:01 -0700</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>Ard Louis</dc:creator>
        <!--<dc:date>May 02, 2011 18:42</dc:date>-->
      </item>
            <item>
        <title>Engaging Today&apos;s Militant Atheist Arguments</title>
        <link>http://biologos.org/essays/engaging&#45;todays&#45;militant&#45;atheist&#45;arguments?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</link>
        <guid>http://biologos.org/essays/engaging&#45;todays&#45;militant&#45;atheist&#45;arguments?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</guid>
        <description>In this paper, MIT professor Ian Hutchinson addresses the question of how to engage arguments put forward by the New Atheists. In doing so, he offers a critique of scientism, the assumption that scientific knowledge is all the real knowledge there is.</description>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[In this paper, MIT professor Ian Hutchinson addresses the question of how to engage arguments put forward by the New Atheists. In doing so, he offers a critique of <em>scientism</em>, the assumption that scientific knowledge is all the real knowledge there is.]]></content:encoded>
        <pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 11 18:14:01 -0700</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>Ian Hutchinson</dc:creator>
        <!--<dc:date>Apr 25, 2011 18:14</dc:date>-->
      </item>
            <item>
        <title>Adventist Origins of Young Earth Creationism</title>
        <link>http://biologos.org/essays/adventist&#45;origins&#45;of&#45;young&#45;earth&#45;creationism?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</link>
        <guid>http://biologos.org/essays/adventist&#45;origins&#45;of&#45;young&#45;earth&#45;creationism?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</guid>
        <description>Many evangelicals believe that Young Earth Creationism is the only authentic, biblical way for Christians to understand origins, and that until the advent of Darwin&apos;s theory of evolution, it was the only view held by Christians. However, in this excerpt from Saving Darwin, Karl Giberson explains that Young Earth Creationism&apos;s origins are surprisingly recent.</description>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[Many evangelicals believe that Young Earth Creationism is the only authentic, biblical way for Christians to understand origins, and that until the advent of Darwin's theory of evolution, it was the <em>only</em> view held by Christians. However, in this excerpt from <em>Saving Darwin</em>, Karl Giberson explains that Young Earth Creationism's origins are surprisingly recent. ]]></content:encoded>
        <pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 11 17:36:54 -0700</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>Karl Giberson</dc:creator>
        <!--<dc:date>Apr 25, 2011 17:36</dc:date>-->
      </item>
            <item>
        <title>Scientific Fundamentalism and its Cultural Impact</title>
        <link>http://biologos.org/essays/scientific&#45;fundamentalism&#45;and&#45;its&#45;cultural&#45;impact?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</link>
        <guid>http://biologos.org/essays/scientific&#45;fundamentalism&#45;and&#45;its&#45;cultural&#45;impact?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</guid>
        <description>Giberson&apos;s essay makes the case that scientific fundamentalists are not merely arguing for the supremacy of science but also presenting science as a quasi&#45;religious replacement. The agenda of the &quot;New Atheists&quot; is not merely to refute mainstream religion but to replace it. Unfortunately, the scientific community is poorly represented by these aggressive public figures.</description>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[Giberson's essay makes the case that scientific fundamentalists are not merely arguing for the supremacy of science but also presenting science as a quasi-religious replacement. The agenda of the "New Atheists" is not merely to refute mainstream religion but to replace it. Unfortunately, the scientific community is poorly represented by these aggressive public figures.]]></content:encoded>
        <pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 11 17:35:35 -0700</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>Karl Giberson</dc:creator>
        <!--<dc:date>Apr 25, 2011 17:35</dc:date>-->
      </item>
            <item>
        <title>What Scientists Do</title>
        <link>http://biologos.org/essays/what&#45;scientists&#45;do?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</link>
        <guid>http://biologos.org/essays/what&#45;scientists&#45;do?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</guid>
        <description>In this scholarly essay, Steve Benner, a Distinguished Fellow of The Foundation for Applied Molecular Evolution in Gainesville, Fla., looks at what the role of a scientist should be. Benner looks specifically at &quot;falsifiability&quot;, the acceptance of uncertainty, and the place of the scientist in public discourse.</description>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[In this scholarly essay, Steve Benner, a Distinguished Fellow of The Foundation for Applied Molecular Evolution in Gainesville, Fla., looks at what the role of a scientist should be. Benner looks specifically at "falsifiability", the acceptance of uncertainty, and the place of the scientist in public discourse.]]></content:encoded>
        <pubDate>Fri, 22 Apr 11 17:22:27 -0700</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>Steven Benner</dc:creator>
        <!--<dc:date>Apr 22, 2011 17:22</dc:date>-->
      </item>
      

      

    
  </channel>
</rss>