<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0"
  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
  xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
  xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
  xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
  xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">

  <channel>
        <title>Custom Feed &#45; The BioLogos Forum</title>
    <link>http://biologos.org/resources/find/Essay/any/Christian Unity,The Flood,Genesis/sort&#45;by&#45;Newest?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</link>
    <description>This is a custom feed of BioLogos resources. Make a new feed at http://biologos.org/resources/find</description>
    <dc:language>en</dc:language>
    <dc:rights>Copyright 2013</dc:rights>
    <dc:date>2013-05-19T21:14:51-08:00</dc:date>    
    
    

            
            
        
      <item>
        <title>Evolutionary Creation: A Christian Approach to Evolution</title>
        <link>http://biologos.org/essays/evolutionary&#45;creation&#45;a&#45;christian&#45;approach&#45;to&#45;evolution?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</link>
        <guid>http://biologos.org/essays/evolutionary&#45;creation&#45;a&#45;christian&#45;approach&#45;to&#45;evolution?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</guid>
        <description>Professor Denis Lamoureux presents the theory of evolutionary creation, which claims that the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit created the universe and life through an ordained, sustained, and design&#45;reflecting evolutionary process. The view of origins, says Lamoureux, fully embraces both the religious beliefs of biblical Christianity and the scientific theories of cosmological, geological, and biological evolution.</description>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[Professor Denis Lamoureux presents the theory of evolutionary creation, which claims that the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit created the universe and life through an ordained, sustained, and design-reflecting evolutionary process. The view of origins, says Lamoureux, fully embraces both the religious beliefs of biblical Christianity and the scientific theories of cosmological, geological, and biological evolution.]]></content:encoded>
        <pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 11 18:35:05 -0700</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>Denis Lamoureux</dc:creator>
        <!--<dc:date>Apr 25, 2011 18:35</dc:date>-->
      </item>
            <item>
        <title>The Biblical Creation in its Ancient Near Eastern Context</title>
        <link>http://biologos.org/essays/the&#45;biblical&#45;creation&#45;in&#45;its&#45;ancient&#45;near&#45;eastern&#45;context?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</link>
        <guid>http://biologos.org/essays/the&#45;biblical&#45;creation&#45;in&#45;its&#45;ancient&#45;near&#45;eastern&#45;context?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</guid>
        <description>&quot;As a Christian and a biblical scholar, I care both about Scripture as truth and about the ongoing scholarly conversation regarding the composition of the Hebrew Scriptures.  And so, when I was asked to speak on the story of creation in Genesis 1, I welcomed the opportunity to give my thoughts on the interaction between this text and its ancient Near Eastern context.&quot;</description>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA["As a Christian and a biblical scholar, I care both about Scripture as truth and about the ongoing scholarly conversation regarding the composition of the Hebrew Scriptures.  And so, when I was asked to speak on the story of creation in Genesis 1, I welcomed the opportunity to give my thoughts on the interaction between this text and its ancient Near Eastern context."]]></content:encoded>
        <pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 11 18:33:35 -0700</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>Joseph Lam</dc:creator>
        <!--<dc:date>Apr 25, 2011 18:33</dc:date>-->
      </item>
            <item>
        <title>The How of Creation: Parameters for Gracious and Fruitful Dialogue</title>
        <link>http://biologos.org/essays/the&#45;how&#45;of&#45;creation&#45;parameters&#45;and&#45;nodes&#45;for&#45;gracious&#45;and&#45;fruitful&#45;dialogue?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</link>
        <guid>http://biologos.org/essays/the&#45;how&#45;of&#45;creation&#45;parameters&#45;and&#45;nodes&#45;for&#45;gracious&#45;and&#45;fruitful&#45;dialogue?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</guid>
        <description>Hastings provides a biblical and theological basis for healthy and fruitful dialogue on the theology and science of origins.</description>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[Hastings provides a biblical and theological basis for healthy and fruitful dialogue on the theology and science of origins.]]></content:encoded>
        <pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 11 18:13:55 -0700</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>Ross Hastings</dc:creator>
        <!--<dc:date>Apr 25, 2011 18:13</dc:date>-->
      </item>
            <item>
        <title>Ephesians 4:7&#45;16: Moving the Science/Faith Discussion Forward</title>
        <link>http://biologos.org/essays/ephesians&#45;47&#45;16&#45;moving&#45;the&#45;science&#45;faith&#45;discussion&#45;forward?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</link>
        <guid>http://biologos.org/essays/ephesians&#45;47&#45;16&#45;moving&#45;the&#45;science&#45;faith&#45;discussion&#45;forward?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</guid>
        <description>In this essay, Hastings looks at “front edge” areas for promoting healthy dialogue in the field of science and Christian theology, areas which are specifically theological in nature.</description>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[In this essay, Hastings looks at “front edge” areas for promoting healthy dialogue in the field of science and Christian theology, areas which are specifically theological in nature.]]></content:encoded>
        <pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 11 18:13:03 -0700</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>Ross Hastings</dc:creator>
        <!--<dc:date>Apr 25, 2011 18:13</dc:date>-->
      </item>
            <item>
        <title>Adventist Origins of Young Earth Creationism</title>
        <link>http://biologos.org/essays/adventist&#45;origins&#45;of&#45;young&#45;earth&#45;creationism?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</link>
        <guid>http://biologos.org/essays/adventist&#45;origins&#45;of&#45;young&#45;earth&#45;creationism?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</guid>
        <description>Many evangelicals believe that Young Earth Creationism is the only authentic, biblical way for Christians to understand origins, and that until the advent of Darwin&apos;s theory of evolution, it was the only view held by Christians. However, in this excerpt from Saving Darwin, Karl Giberson explains that Young Earth Creationism&apos;s origins are surprisingly recent.</description>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[Many evangelicals believe that Young Earth Creationism is the only authentic, biblical way for Christians to understand origins, and that until the advent of Darwin's theory of evolution, it was the <em>only</em> view held by Christians. However, in this excerpt from <em>Saving Darwin</em>, Karl Giberson explains that Young Earth Creationism's origins are surprisingly recent. ]]></content:encoded>
        <pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 11 17:36:54 -0700</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>Karl Giberson</dc:creator>
        <!--<dc:date>Apr 25, 2011 17:36</dc:date>-->
      </item>
            <item>
        <title>Christian Geologists on Noah’s Flood: Biblical and Scientific Shortcomings of Flood Geology</title>
        <link>http://biologos.org/essays/christian&#45;geologists&#45;on&#45;noahs&#45;flood&#45;biblical&#45;and&#45;scientific&#45;shortcomings&#45;of?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</link>
        <guid>http://biologos.org/essays/christian&#45;geologists&#45;on&#45;noahs&#45;flood&#45;biblical&#45;and&#45;scientific&#45;shortcomings&#45;of?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</guid>
        <description>Geologists Davidson and Wolgemuth address the widely promulgated notion that the Flood can account for the earth’s complex geology, and that all genuine Christians should accept this viewpoint.</description>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[Geologists Davidson and Wolgemuth address the widely promulgated notion that the Flood can account for the earth’s complex geology, and that all genuine Christians should accept this viewpoint.]]></content:encoded>
        <pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 11 17:09:05 -0700</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>Gregg Davidson and Ken Wolgemuth</dc:creator>
        <!--<dc:date>Apr 25, 2011 17:09</dc:date>-->
      </item>
            <item>
        <title>Recovering the Doctrine of Creation: A Theological View of Science</title>
        <link>http://biologos.org/essays/recovering&#45;the&#45;doctrine&#45;of&#45;creation&#45;a&#45;theological&#45;view&#45;of&#45;science?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</link>
        <guid>http://biologos.org/essays/recovering&#45;the&#45;doctrine&#45;of&#45;creation&#45;a&#45;theological&#45;view&#45;of&#45;science?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</guid>
        <description>Philosopher Robert Bishop explores the Biblical doctrine of creation, which he describes as &quot;perhaps one of the most helpful pieces of theology for thinking about science&quot;, and describes why the doctrine needs to be recovered from narrower, contemporary interpretations of creation.</description>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[Philosopher Robert Bishop explores the Biblical doctrine of creation, which he describes as "perhaps one of the most helpful pieces of theology for thinking about science", and describes why the doctrine needs to be recovered from narrower, contemporary interpretations of creation.]]></content:encoded>
        <pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 11 16:43:49 -0700</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>Robert C. Bishop</dc:creator>
        <!--<dc:date>Apr 25, 2011 16:43</dc:date>-->
      </item>
            <item>
        <title>How Does a BioLogos model need to address the theological issues</title>
        <link>http://biologos.org/essays/how&#45;does&#45;a&#45;biologos&#45;model&#45;need&#45;to&#45;address&#45;the&#45;theological&#45;issues?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</link>
        <guid>http://biologos.org/essays/how&#45;does&#45;a&#45;biologos&#45;model&#45;need&#45;to&#45;address&#45;the&#45;theological&#45;issues?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</guid>
        <description>Science and Religion scholar Denis Alexander presents two models for relating Adam and Eve with the findings of contemporary anthropology. This essay was presented at the November 2010 Theology of Celebration Workshop</description>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[Science and Religion scholar Denis Alexander presents two models for relating Adam and Eve with the findings of contemporary anthropology. This essay was presented at the November 2010 Theology of Celebration Workshop]]></content:encoded>
        <pubDate>Fri, 22 Apr 11 17:13:49 -0700</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>Denis Alexander</dc:creator>
        <!--<dc:date>Apr 22, 2011 17:13</dc:date>-->
      </item>
      

      

    
  </channel>
</rss>