<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0"
  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
  xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
  xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
  xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
  xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">

  <channel>
        <title>Custom Feed &#45; The BioLogos Forum</title>
    <link>http://biologos.org/resources/find/Essay/any/BioLogos,Scientists,Evolution &#45; Evidence/sort&#45;by&#45;Newest?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</link>
    <description>This is a custom feed of BioLogos resources. Make a new feed at http://biologos.org/resources/find</description>
    <dc:language>en</dc:language>
    <dc:rights>Copyright 2013</dc:rights>
    <dc:date>2013-05-24T16:21:40-08:00</dc:date>    
    
    

            
            
        
      <item>
        <title>Seeking a Signature</title>
        <link>http://biologos.org/essays/seeking&#45;a&#45;signature?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</link>
        <guid>http://biologos.org/essays/seeking&#45;a&#45;signature?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</guid>
        <description>In this article, Venema offers his review of Stephen Meyer&apos;s book Signature in the Cell.</description>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[In this article, Venema offers his review of Stephen Meyer's book <em>Signature in the Cell</em>.]]></content:encoded>
        <pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 11 15:14:01 -0700</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>Dennis Venema</dc:creator>
        <!--<dc:date>Oct 19, 2011 15:14</dc:date>-->
      </item>
            <item>
        <title>Genesis and the Genome</title>
        <link>http://biologos.org/essays/genesis&#45;and&#45;the&#45;genome?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</link>
        <guid>http://biologos.org/essays/genesis&#45;and&#45;the&#45;genome?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</guid>
        <description>This article provides an overview of genomics evidence for common ancestry and hominid population sizes, and briefly discusses the implications of these lines of evidence for scientific concordist approaches to the Genesis narratives.</description>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[This article provides an overview of genomics evidence for common ancestry and hominid population sizes, and briefly discusses the implications of these lines of evidence for scientific concordist approaches to the Genesis narratives.]]></content:encoded>
        <pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 11 15:09:09 -0700</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>Dennis Venema</dc:creator>
        <!--<dc:date>Oct 19, 2011 15:09</dc:date>-->
      </item>
            <item>
        <title>Evolution and the Origin of Biological Information</title>
        <link>http://biologos.org/essays/evolution&#45;and&#45;the&#45;origin&#45;of&#45;biological&#45;information?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</link>
        <guid>http://biologos.org/essays/evolution&#45;and&#45;the&#45;origin&#45;of&#45;biological&#45;information?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</guid>
        <description>In this paper, Venema explores several examples in biology where random mutation and natural selection have indeed led to substantial increases in biological information. The question of how new specified information arises in DNA, far from being an “enigma”, is one of great interest to biologists.</description>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[In this paper, Venema explores several examples in biology where random mutation and natural selection have indeed led to substantial increases in biological information. The question of how new specified information arises in DNA, far from being an “enigma”, is one of great interest to biologists. ]]></content:encoded>
        <pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 11 14:48:05 -0700</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>Dennis Venema</dc:creator>
        <!--<dc:date>Oct 19, 2011 14:48</dc:date>-->
      </item>
            <item>
        <title>From Intelligent Design to BioLogos</title>
        <link>http://biologos.org/essays/from&#45;intelligent&#45;design&#45;to&#45;biologos?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</link>
        <guid>http://biologos.org/essays/from&#45;intelligent&#45;design&#45;to&#45;biologos?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</guid>
        <description>In this paper, Venema tells the story of his transition from support of Intelligent Design to the view that God uses evolution as a creative mechanism.</description>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[In this paper, Venema tells the story of his transition from support of Intelligent Design to the view that God uses evolution as a creative mechanism.]]></content:encoded>
        <pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 11 14:17:25 -0700</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>Dennis Venema</dc:creator>
        <!--<dc:date>Oct 19, 2011 14:17</dc:date>-->
      </item>
            <item>
        <title>Barriers to Accepting Creation by an Evolutionary Process: Concerns of the Evangelical Theologian</title>
        <link>http://biologos.org/essays/barriers&#45;to&#45;accepting&#45;creation&#45;by&#45;an&#45;evolutionary&#45;process&#45;I?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</link>
        <guid>http://biologos.org/essays/barriers&#45;to&#45;accepting&#45;creation&#45;by&#45;an&#45;evolutionary&#45;process&#45;I?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</guid>
        <description>Renowned Old Testament scholar Bruce Waltke considers eleven barriers that prevent evangelical theologians from accepting evolution as a possible means of creation and what these barriers tell us about the tensions perceived by many Evangelicals between science and faith. Waltke&apos;s work was based on a survey sent to members of the Fellowship of Evangelical Seminary Presidents and their faculty.</description>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[Renowned Old Testament scholar Bruce Waltke considers eleven barriers that prevent evangelical theologians from accepting evolution as a possible means of creation and what these barriers tell us about the tensions perceived by many Evangelicals between science and faith. Waltke's work was based on a survey sent to members of the Fellowship of Evangelical Seminary Presidents and their faculty.]]></content:encoded>
        <pubDate>Mon, 02 May 11 19:04:27 -0700</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>Bruce Waltke</dc:creator>
        <!--<dc:date>May 02, 2011 19:04</dc:date>-->
      </item>
            <item>
        <title>How Does the BioLogos Model Need to Address Concerns About Science?</title>
        <link>http://biologos.org/essays/how&#45;does&#45;the&#45;biologos&#45;model&#45;need&#45;to&#45;address&#45;concerns&#45;about&#45;science?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</link>
        <guid>http://biologos.org/essays/how&#45;does&#45;the&#45;biologos&#45;model&#45;need&#45;to&#45;address&#45;concerns&#45;about&#45;science?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</guid>
        <description>Many barriers to the acceptance of the BioLogos model by evangelical Christians arise from popular misconceptions about the nature of science and its relationship to God&apos;s action in our world.</description>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[Many barriers to the acceptance of the BioLogos model by evangelical Christians arise from popular misconceptions about the nature of science and its relationship to God's action in our world.]]></content:encoded>
        <pubDate>Mon, 02 May 11 18:42:01 -0700</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>Ard Louis</dc:creator>
        <!--<dc:date>May 02, 2011 18:42</dc:date>-->
      </item>
            <item>
        <title>Engaging Today&apos;s Militant Atheist Arguments</title>
        <link>http://biologos.org/essays/engaging&#45;todays&#45;militant&#45;atheist&#45;arguments?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</link>
        <guid>http://biologos.org/essays/engaging&#45;todays&#45;militant&#45;atheist&#45;arguments?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</guid>
        <description>In this paper, MIT professor Ian Hutchinson addresses the question of how to engage arguments put forward by the New Atheists. In doing so, he offers a critique of scientism, the assumption that scientific knowledge is all the real knowledge there is.</description>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[In this paper, MIT professor Ian Hutchinson addresses the question of how to engage arguments put forward by the New Atheists. In doing so, he offers a critique of <em>scientism</em>, the assumption that scientific knowledge is all the real knowledge there is.]]></content:encoded>
        <pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 11 18:14:01 -0700</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>Ian Hutchinson</dc:creator>
        <!--<dc:date>Apr 25, 2011 18:14</dc:date>-->
      </item>
            <item>
        <title>Scientific Fundamentalism and its Cultural Impact</title>
        <link>http://biologos.org/essays/scientific&#45;fundamentalism&#45;and&#45;its&#45;cultural&#45;impact?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</link>
        <guid>http://biologos.org/essays/scientific&#45;fundamentalism&#45;and&#45;its&#45;cultural&#45;impact?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</guid>
        <description>Giberson&apos;s essay makes the case that scientific fundamentalists are not merely arguing for the supremacy of science but also presenting science as a quasi&#45;religious replacement. The agenda of the &quot;New Atheists&quot; is not merely to refute mainstream religion but to replace it. Unfortunately, the scientific community is poorly represented by these aggressive public figures.</description>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[Giberson's essay makes the case that scientific fundamentalists are not merely arguing for the supremacy of science but also presenting science as a quasi-religious replacement. The agenda of the "New Atheists" is not merely to refute mainstream religion but to replace it. Unfortunately, the scientific community is poorly represented by these aggressive public figures.]]></content:encoded>
        <pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 11 17:35:35 -0700</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>Karl Giberson</dc:creator>
        <!--<dc:date>Apr 25, 2011 17:35</dc:date>-->
      </item>
            <item>
        <title>How Does a BioLogos model need to address the theological issues</title>
        <link>http://biologos.org/essays/how&#45;does&#45;a&#45;biologos&#45;model&#45;need&#45;to&#45;address&#45;the&#45;theological&#45;issues?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</link>
        <guid>http://biologos.org/essays/how&#45;does&#45;a&#45;biologos&#45;model&#45;need&#45;to&#45;address&#45;the&#45;theological&#45;issues?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</guid>
        <description>Science and Religion scholar Denis Alexander presents two models for relating Adam and Eve with the findings of contemporary anthropology. This essay was presented at the November 2010 Theology of Celebration Workshop</description>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[Science and Religion scholar Denis Alexander presents two models for relating Adam and Eve with the findings of contemporary anthropology. This essay was presented at the November 2010 Theology of Celebration Workshop]]></content:encoded>
        <pubDate>Fri, 22 Apr 11 17:13:49 -0700</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>Denis Alexander</dc:creator>
        <!--<dc:date>Apr 22, 2011 17:13</dc:date>-->
      </item>
      

      

    
  </channel>
</rss>