<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0"
  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
  xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
  xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
  xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
  xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">

  <channel>
        <title>Custom Feed &#45; The BioLogos Forum</title>
    <link>http://biologos.org/resources/find/Essay/any/Biblical Interpretation,The Flood,Pastoral Voices/sort&#45;by&#45;Newest?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</link>
    <description>This is a custom feed of BioLogos resources. Make a new feed at http://biologos.org/resources/find</description>
    <dc:language>en</dc:language>
    <dc:rights>Copyright 2013</dc:rights>
    <dc:date>2013-05-21T10:38:51-08:00</dc:date>    
    
    

            
            
        
      <item>
        <title>Evangelicals, Creation, and Scripture: An Overview</title>
        <link>http://biologos.org/essays/evangelicals&#45;creation&#45;and&#45;scripture&#45;an&#45;overview?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</link>
        <guid>http://biologos.org/essays/evangelicals&#45;creation&#45;and&#45;scripture&#45;an&#45;overview?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</guid>
        <description>Mark Noll, historian and author of The Scandal of the Evangelical Mind, enumerates 15 attitudes, assumptions, and convictions he considers to be most influential in inciting anti&#45;intellectual sentiment among evangelical Christians.</description>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[Mark Noll, historian and author of <em>The Scandal of the Evangelical Mind</em>, enumerates 15 attitudes, assumptions, and convictions he considers to be most influential in inciting anti-intellectual sentiment among evangelical Christians.]]></content:encoded>
        <pubDate>Mon, 02 May 11 18:50:53 -0700</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>Mark Noll</dc:creator>
        <!--<dc:date>May 02, 2011 18:50</dc:date>-->
      </item>
            <item>
        <title>Creation, Evolution, and Christian Laypeople</title>
        <link>http://biologos.org/essays/concerns&#45;of&#45;the&#45;typical&#45;parishonerquot&#45;or&#45;quotcreation&#45;evolution&#45;and&#45;christ?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</link>
        <guid>http://biologos.org/essays/concerns&#45;of&#45;the&#45;typical&#45;parishonerquot&#45;or&#45;quotcreation&#45;evolution&#45;and&#45;christ?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</guid>
        <description>In this paper, Keller considers three main clusters of questions lay people raise when they learn of anyone teaching that biological evolution and biblical orthodoxy can be compatible. Keller offers some ideas on how to provide responses that take these concerns seriously.</description>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[In this paper, Keller considers three main clusters of questions lay people raise when they learn of anyone teaching that biological evolution and biblical orthodoxy can be compatible. Keller offers some ideas on how to provide responses that take these concerns seriously.]]></content:encoded>
        <pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 11 18:17:57 -0700</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>Tim Keller</dc:creator>
        <!--<dc:date>Apr 25, 2011 18:17</dc:date>-->
      </item>
            <item>
        <title>Science and the Question of God</title>
        <link>http://biologos.org/essays/science&#45;and&#45;the&#45;question&#45;of&#45;god?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</link>
        <guid>http://biologos.org/essays/science&#45;and&#45;the&#45;question&#45;of&#45;god?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</guid>
        <description>Can science provide substantive insight into the question of God’s existence? Isaac&apos;s paper examines three schools of thought regarding the possibility of detecting God’s existence through science: Evolutionism, Creationism, and Intelligent Design.</description>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[Can science provide substantive insight into the question of God’s existence? Isaac's paper examines three schools of thought regarding the possibility of detecting God’s existence through science: Evolutionism, Creationism, and Intelligent Design.]]></content:encoded>
        <pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 11 18:15:17 -0700</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>Randy Isaac</dc:creator>
        <!--<dc:date>Apr 25, 2011 18:15</dc:date>-->
      </item>
            <item>
        <title>Adventist Origins of Young Earth Creationism</title>
        <link>http://biologos.org/essays/adventist&#45;origins&#45;of&#45;young&#45;earth&#45;creationism?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</link>
        <guid>http://biologos.org/essays/adventist&#45;origins&#45;of&#45;young&#45;earth&#45;creationism?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</guid>
        <description>Many evangelicals believe that Young Earth Creationism is the only authentic, biblical way for Christians to understand origins, and that until the advent of Darwin&apos;s theory of evolution, it was the only view held by Christians. However, in this excerpt from Saving Darwin, Karl Giberson explains that Young Earth Creationism&apos;s origins are surprisingly recent.</description>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[Many evangelicals believe that Young Earth Creationism is the only authentic, biblical way for Christians to understand origins, and that until the advent of Darwin's theory of evolution, it was the <em>only</em> view held by Christians. However, in this excerpt from <em>Saving Darwin</em>, Karl Giberson explains that Young Earth Creationism's origins are surprisingly recent. ]]></content:encoded>
        <pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 11 17:36:54 -0700</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>Karl Giberson</dc:creator>
        <!--<dc:date>Apr 25, 2011 17:36</dc:date>-->
      </item>
            <item>
        <title>Concerns of the Typical Agnostic Scientist</title>
        <link>http://biologos.org/essays/concerns&#45;of&#45;the&#45;typical&#45;agnostic&#45;scientist?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</link>
        <guid>http://biologos.org/essays/concerns&#45;of&#45;the&#45;typical&#45;agnostic&#45;scientist?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</guid>
        <description>Falk&apos;s paper asks evangelical Christians to explore whether they are propping up a bubble that they, not God, have created, thereby isolating themselves from the world of academics. The essay describes five layers that may play a role in unnecessarily blocking entry, or reentry, of agnostic scientists into the realm of evangelicalism.</description>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[Falk's paper asks evangelical Christians to explore whether they are propping up a bubble that they, not God, have created, thereby isolating themselves from the world of academics. The essay describes five layers that may play a role in unnecessarily blocking entry, or reentry, of agnostic scientists into the realm of evangelicalism. ]]></content:encoded>
        <pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 11 17:17:59 -0700</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>Darrel Falk</dc:creator>
        <!--<dc:date>Apr 25, 2011 17:17</dc:date>-->
      </item>
            <item>
        <title>Christian Geologists on Noah’s Flood: Biblical and Scientific Shortcomings of Flood Geology</title>
        <link>http://biologos.org/essays/christian&#45;geologists&#45;on&#45;noahs&#45;flood&#45;biblical&#45;and&#45;scientific&#45;shortcomings&#45;of?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</link>
        <guid>http://biologos.org/essays/christian&#45;geologists&#45;on&#45;noahs&#45;flood&#45;biblical&#45;and&#45;scientific&#45;shortcomings&#45;of?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</guid>
        <description>Geologists Davidson and Wolgemuth address the widely promulgated notion that the Flood can account for the earth’s complex geology, and that all genuine Christians should accept this viewpoint.</description>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[Geologists Davidson and Wolgemuth address the widely promulgated notion that the Flood can account for the earth’s complex geology, and that all genuine Christians should accept this viewpoint.]]></content:encoded>
        <pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 11 17:09:05 -0700</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>Gregg Davidson and Ken Wolgemuth</dc:creator>
        <!--<dc:date>Apr 25, 2011 17:09</dc:date>-->
      </item>
      

      

    
  </channel>
</rss>