<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0"
  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
  xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
  xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
  xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
  xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">

  <channel>
        <title>Custom Feed &#45; The BioLogos Forum</title>
    <link>http://biologos.org/resources/find/Essay/any/Biblical Authority,Scientists,Young Earth Creationism/sort&#45;by&#45;Newest?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</link>
    <description>This is a custom feed of BioLogos resources. Make a new feed at http://biologos.org/resources/find</description>
    <dc:language>en</dc:language>
    <dc:rights>Copyright 2013</dc:rights>
    <dc:date>2013-05-21T07:52:34-08:00</dc:date>    
    
    

            
            
        
      <item>
        <title>Seeking a Signature</title>
        <link>http://biologos.org/essays/seeking&#45;a&#45;signature?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</link>
        <guid>http://biologos.org/essays/seeking&#45;a&#45;signature?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</guid>
        <description>In this article, Venema offers his review of Stephen Meyer&apos;s book Signature in the Cell.</description>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[In this article, Venema offers his review of Stephen Meyer's book <em>Signature in the Cell</em>.]]></content:encoded>
        <pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 11 15:14:01 -0700</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>Dennis Venema</dc:creator>
        <!--<dc:date>Oct 19, 2011 15:14</dc:date>-->
      </item>
            <item>
        <title>Evolution and the Origin of Biological Information</title>
        <link>http://biologos.org/essays/evolution&#45;and&#45;the&#45;origin&#45;of&#45;biological&#45;information?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</link>
        <guid>http://biologos.org/essays/evolution&#45;and&#45;the&#45;origin&#45;of&#45;biological&#45;information?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</guid>
        <description>In this paper, Venema explores several examples in biology where random mutation and natural selection have indeed led to substantial increases in biological information. The question of how new specified information arises in DNA, far from being an “enigma”, is one of great interest to biologists.</description>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[In this paper, Venema explores several examples in biology where random mutation and natural selection have indeed led to substantial increases in biological information. The question of how new specified information arises in DNA, far from being an “enigma”, is one of great interest to biologists. ]]></content:encoded>
        <pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 11 14:48:05 -0700</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>Dennis Venema</dc:creator>
        <!--<dc:date>Oct 19, 2011 14:48</dc:date>-->
      </item>
            <item>
        <title>Evangelicals, Creation, and Scripture: An Overview</title>
        <link>http://biologos.org/essays/evangelicals&#45;creation&#45;and&#45;scripture&#45;an&#45;overview?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</link>
        <guid>http://biologos.org/essays/evangelicals&#45;creation&#45;and&#45;scripture&#45;an&#45;overview?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</guid>
        <description>Mark Noll, historian and author of The Scandal of the Evangelical Mind, enumerates 15 attitudes, assumptions, and convictions he considers to be most influential in inciting anti&#45;intellectual sentiment among evangelical Christians.</description>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[Mark Noll, historian and author of <em>The Scandal of the Evangelical Mind</em>, enumerates 15 attitudes, assumptions, and convictions he considers to be most influential in inciting anti-intellectual sentiment among evangelical Christians.]]></content:encoded>
        <pubDate>Mon, 02 May 11 18:50:53 -0700</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>Mark Noll</dc:creator>
        <!--<dc:date>May 02, 2011 18:50</dc:date>-->
      </item>
            <item>
        <title>Science and the Question of God</title>
        <link>http://biologos.org/essays/science&#45;and&#45;the&#45;question&#45;of&#45;god?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</link>
        <guid>http://biologos.org/essays/science&#45;and&#45;the&#45;question&#45;of&#45;god?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</guid>
        <description>Can science provide substantive insight into the question of God’s existence? Isaac&apos;s paper examines three schools of thought regarding the possibility of detecting God’s existence through science: Evolutionism, Creationism, and Intelligent Design.</description>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[Can science provide substantive insight into the question of God’s existence? Isaac's paper examines three schools of thought regarding the possibility of detecting God’s existence through science: Evolutionism, Creationism, and Intelligent Design.]]></content:encoded>
        <pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 11 18:15:17 -0700</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>Randy Isaac</dc:creator>
        <!--<dc:date>Apr 25, 2011 18:15</dc:date>-->
      </item>
            <item>
        <title>Engaging Today&apos;s Militant Atheist Arguments</title>
        <link>http://biologos.org/essays/engaging&#45;todays&#45;militant&#45;atheist&#45;arguments?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</link>
        <guid>http://biologos.org/essays/engaging&#45;todays&#45;militant&#45;atheist&#45;arguments?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</guid>
        <description>In this paper, MIT professor Ian Hutchinson addresses the question of how to engage arguments put forward by the New Atheists. In doing so, he offers a critique of scientism, the assumption that scientific knowledge is all the real knowledge there is.</description>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[In this paper, MIT professor Ian Hutchinson addresses the question of how to engage arguments put forward by the New Atheists. In doing so, he offers a critique of <em>scientism</em>, the assumption that scientific knowledge is all the real knowledge there is.]]></content:encoded>
        <pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 11 18:14:01 -0700</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>Ian Hutchinson</dc:creator>
        <!--<dc:date>Apr 25, 2011 18:14</dc:date>-->
      </item>
            <item>
        <title>Adventist Origins of Young Earth Creationism</title>
        <link>http://biologos.org/essays/adventist&#45;origins&#45;of&#45;young&#45;earth&#45;creationism?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</link>
        <guid>http://biologos.org/essays/adventist&#45;origins&#45;of&#45;young&#45;earth&#45;creationism?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</guid>
        <description>Many evangelicals believe that Young Earth Creationism is the only authentic, biblical way for Christians to understand origins, and that until the advent of Darwin&apos;s theory of evolution, it was the only view held by Christians. However, in this excerpt from Saving Darwin, Karl Giberson explains that Young Earth Creationism&apos;s origins are surprisingly recent.</description>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[Many evangelicals believe that Young Earth Creationism is the only authentic, biblical way for Christians to understand origins, and that until the advent of Darwin's theory of evolution, it was the <em>only</em> view held by Christians. However, in this excerpt from <em>Saving Darwin</em>, Karl Giberson explains that Young Earth Creationism's origins are surprisingly recent. ]]></content:encoded>
        <pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 11 17:36:54 -0700</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>Karl Giberson</dc:creator>
        <!--<dc:date>Apr 25, 2011 17:36</dc:date>-->
      </item>
            <item>
        <title>Scientific Fundamentalism and its Cultural Impact</title>
        <link>http://biologos.org/essays/scientific&#45;fundamentalism&#45;and&#45;its&#45;cultural&#45;impact?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</link>
        <guid>http://biologos.org/essays/scientific&#45;fundamentalism&#45;and&#45;its&#45;cultural&#45;impact?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</guid>
        <description>Giberson&apos;s essay makes the case that scientific fundamentalists are not merely arguing for the supremacy of science but also presenting science as a quasi&#45;religious replacement. The agenda of the &quot;New Atheists&quot; is not merely to refute mainstream religion but to replace it. Unfortunately, the scientific community is poorly represented by these aggressive public figures.</description>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[Giberson's essay makes the case that scientific fundamentalists are not merely arguing for the supremacy of science but also presenting science as a quasi-religious replacement. The agenda of the "New Atheists" is not merely to refute mainstream religion but to replace it. Unfortunately, the scientific community is poorly represented by these aggressive public figures.]]></content:encoded>
        <pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 11 17:35:35 -0700</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>Karl Giberson</dc:creator>
        <!--<dc:date>Apr 25, 2011 17:35</dc:date>-->
      </item>
            <item>
        <title>An Incarnational Model of Scripture</title>
        <link>http://biologos.org/essays/preliminary&#45;observations&#45;on&#45;an&#45;incarnational&#45;model&#45;of&#45;scripture&#45;its&#45;viabili?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</link>
        <guid>http://biologos.org/essays/preliminary&#45;observations&#45;on&#45;an&#45;incarnational&#45;model&#45;of&#45;scripture&#45;its&#45;viabili?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</guid>
        <description>The Bible is no more a book dropped out of the sky than Jesus is some superman who flew down from heaven. Instead, just as Jesus is “God incarnate,” both divine and human, the Bible is a book that speaks God’s word and reflects the thoughts, ideas, and worldviews of the human authors.</description>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[The Bible is no more a book dropped out of the sky than Jesus is some superman who flew down from heaven. Instead, just as Jesus is “God incarnate,” both divine and human, the Bible is a book that speaks God’s word <em>and</em> reflects the thoughts, ideas, and worldviews of the human authors.]]></content:encoded>
        <pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 11 17:15:29 -0700</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>Pete Enns</dc:creator>
        <!--<dc:date>Apr 25, 2011 17:15</dc:date>-->
      </item>
            <item>
        <title>Recovering the Doctrine of Creation: A Theological View of Science</title>
        <link>http://biologos.org/essays/recovering&#45;the&#45;doctrine&#45;of&#45;creation&#45;a&#45;theological&#45;view&#45;of&#45;science?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</link>
        <guid>http://biologos.org/essays/recovering&#45;the&#45;doctrine&#45;of&#45;creation&#45;a&#45;theological&#45;view&#45;of&#45;science?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</guid>
        <description>Philosopher Robert Bishop explores the Biblical doctrine of creation, which he describes as &quot;perhaps one of the most helpful pieces of theology for thinking about science&quot;, and describes why the doctrine needs to be recovered from narrower, contemporary interpretations of creation.</description>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[Philosopher Robert Bishop explores the Biblical doctrine of creation, which he describes as "perhaps one of the most helpful pieces of theology for thinking about science", and describes why the doctrine needs to be recovered from narrower, contemporary interpretations of creation.]]></content:encoded>
        <pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 11 16:43:49 -0700</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>Robert C. Bishop</dc:creator>
        <!--<dc:date>Apr 25, 2011 16:43</dc:date>-->
      </item>
      

      

    
  </channel>
</rss>