<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0"
  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
  xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
  xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
  xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
  xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">

  <channel>
        <title>Custom Feed &#45; The BioLogos Forum</title>
    <link>http://biologos.org/resources/find/Essay/any/Atheism &amp; Scientism,Adam_ the Fall_ and Sin/sort&#45;by&#45;Newest?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</link>
    <description>This is a custom feed of BioLogos resources. Make a new feed at http://biologos.org/resources/find</description>
    <dc:language>en</dc:language>
    <dc:rights>Copyright 2013</dc:rights>
    <dc:date>2013-05-25T11:13:58-08:00</dc:date>    
    
    

            
            
        
      <item>
        <title>Understanding Adam</title>
        <link>http://biologos.org/essays/understanding&#45;adam?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</link>
        <guid>http://biologos.org/essays/understanding&#45;adam?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</guid>
        <description>In this paper, Pete Enns looks at from a unique angle to some: Adam is the beginning of Israel, not humanity. He follows through with how this line of thinking affects our reading of the Genesis account.</description>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[In this paper, Pete Enns looks at from a unique angle to some: Adam is the beginning of Israel, not humanity. He follows through with how this line of thinking affects our reading of the Genesis account.]]></content:encoded>
        <pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 11 13:33:48 -0700</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>Pete Enns</dc:creator>
        <!--<dc:date>Oct 19, 2011 13:33</dc:date>-->
      </item>
            <item>
        <title>Accommodationist and Proud of It</title>
        <link>http://biologos.org/essays/accommodationist&#45;and&#45;proud&#45;of&#45;it?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</link>
        <guid>http://biologos.org/essays/accommodationist&#45;and&#45;proud&#45;of&#45;it?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</guid>
        <description>Science and religion scholar Michael Ruse gives a personal account of his experiences as an author and public speaker on the compatibility of Christianity and biological evolution.</description>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[Science and religion scholar Michael Ruse gives a personal account of his experiences as an author and public speaker on the compatibility of Christianity and biological evolution.]]></content:encoded>
        <pubDate>Mon, 02 May 11 18:53:59 -0700</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>Michael Ruse</dc:creator>
        <!--<dc:date>May 02, 2011 18:53</dc:date>-->
      </item>
            <item>
        <title>Human Evolution in Theological Context</title>
        <link>http://biologos.org/essays/human&#45;evolution&#45;in&#45;theological&#45;context?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</link>
        <guid>http://biologos.org/essays/human&#45;evolution&#45;in&#45;theological&#45;context?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</guid>
        <description>In this scholarly paper, physicist, theologian, and minister George Murphy offers a theological look at human evolution and the implications it has for Christianity.</description>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[In this scholarly paper, physicist, theologian, and minister George Murphy offers a theological look at human evolution and the implications it has for Christianity.]]></content:encoded>
        <pubDate>Mon, 02 May 11 18:46:30 -0700</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>George Murphy</dc:creator>
        <!--<dc:date>May 02, 2011 18:46</dc:date>-->
      </item>
            <item>
        <title>Engaging Today&apos;s Militant Atheist Arguments</title>
        <link>http://biologos.org/essays/engaging&#45;todays&#45;militant&#45;atheist&#45;arguments?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</link>
        <guid>http://biologos.org/essays/engaging&#45;todays&#45;militant&#45;atheist&#45;arguments?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</guid>
        <description>In this paper, MIT professor Ian Hutchinson addresses the question of how to engage arguments put forward by the New Atheists. In doing so, he offers a critique of scientism, the assumption that scientific knowledge is all the real knowledge there is.</description>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[In this paper, MIT professor Ian Hutchinson addresses the question of how to engage arguments put forward by the New Atheists. In doing so, he offers a critique of <em>scientism</em>, the assumption that scientific knowledge is all the real knowledge there is.]]></content:encoded>
        <pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 11 18:14:01 -0700</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>Ian Hutchinson</dc:creator>
        <!--<dc:date>Apr 25, 2011 18:14</dc:date>-->
      </item>
            <item>
        <title>Scientific Fundamentalism and its Cultural Impact</title>
        <link>http://biologos.org/essays/scientific&#45;fundamentalism&#45;and&#45;its&#45;cultural&#45;impact?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</link>
        <guid>http://biologos.org/essays/scientific&#45;fundamentalism&#45;and&#45;its&#45;cultural&#45;impact?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</guid>
        <description>Giberson&apos;s essay makes the case that scientific fundamentalists are not merely arguing for the supremacy of science but also presenting science as a quasi&#45;religious replacement. The agenda of the &quot;New Atheists&quot; is not merely to refute mainstream religion but to replace it. Unfortunately, the scientific community is poorly represented by these aggressive public figures.</description>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[Giberson's essay makes the case that scientific fundamentalists are not merely arguing for the supremacy of science but also presenting science as a quasi-religious replacement. The agenda of the "New Atheists" is not merely to refute mainstream religion but to replace it. Unfortunately, the scientific community is poorly represented by these aggressive public figures.]]></content:encoded>
        <pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 11 17:35:35 -0700</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>Karl Giberson</dc:creator>
        <!--<dc:date>Apr 25, 2011 17:35</dc:date>-->
      </item>
      

      

    
  </channel>
</rss>