<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0"
  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
  xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
  xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
  xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
  xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">

  <channel>
        <title>Custom Feed &#45; The BioLogos Forum</title>
    <link>http://biologos.org/resources/find/Essay,Question/sort&#45;by&#45;Newest/sort&#45;by&#45;Newest?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</link>
    <description>This is a custom feed of BioLogos resources. Make a new feed at http://biologos.org/resources/find</description>
    <dc:language>en</dc:language>
    <dc:rights>Copyright 2013</dc:rights>
    <dc:date>2013-05-22T00:35:45-08:00</dc:date>    
    
    

            
            
        
      <item>
        <title>What evidence do we have for evolution besides fossils and genes?</title>
        <link>http://biologos.org/questions/what&#45;evidence&#45;do&#45;we&#45;have&#45;for&#45;evolution&#45;besides&#45;fossils&#45;and&#45;genes?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</link>
        <guid>http://biologos.org/questions/what&#45;evidence&#45;do&#45;we&#45;have&#45;for&#45;evolution&#45;besides&#45;fossils&#45;and&#45;genes?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</guid>
        <description>Scientists have found multiple lines of evidence for evolution, not just one or two.  These types of evidence are independent of each other, coming from sources as different as ancient fossils and modern genetics labs. Evidence also comes from comparing the anatomy of creatures living today.  All creatures with four limbs (whether mammals, birds, or reptiles) have the same bone structure in each limb, pointing to their descent from a common ancestor. More evidence comes from biogeography.  Isolated islands are missing common species found on the mainland, but are filled with many unique species that can be related by a common ancestor. Finally, evidence comes from embryonic development.  As an embryo of a mammal grows, its heart develops through stages similar to fish, amphibians, and reptiles.  God’s creation declares the history of life in many different ways. All these ways are pointing to a consistent picture of God creating through evolution.</description>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[<em>Coming soon.</em>]]></content:encoded>
        <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 12 13:25:46 -0700</pubDate>
        <dc:creator></dc:creator>
        <!--<dc:date>Jul 13, 2012 13:25</dc:date>-->
      </item>
            <item>
        <title>What scientific evidence do we have about the first humans?</title>
        <link>http://biologos.org/questions/what&#45;scientific&#45;evidence&#45;do&#45;we&#45;have&#45;about&#45;the&#45;first&#45;humans?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</link>
        <guid>http://biologos.org/questions/what&#45;scientific&#45;evidence&#45;do&#45;we&#45;have&#45;about&#45;the&#45;first&#45;humans?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</guid>
        <description>In recent decades, scientists have discovered more about the beginnings of humanity.  The fossil record shows a gradual transition over 5 million years ago from chimpanzee&#45;size creatures to hominids with larger brains who walked on two legs.   Later hominids used fire and stone tools and had brains as large as modern humans.  Fossils of homo sapiens in east Africa date back nearly 200,000 years.  Humans developed hearths for fire, stone points for spears and arrows, and cave paintings by 30,000 years ago.   By 10,000 years ago, humans had spread throughout the globe.   Genetic studies support the same picture.  Humans share more DNA with chimpanzees than with any other animal, suggesting that humans and chimps share a relatively recent common ancestor.  Also, the same defective genes appear in both humans and chimps, at the same locations in the genome—an observation difficult to explain except by common ancestry. Genetics also tells us that the human population today descended from more than two people. Evolution happens not to individuals but to populations, and the amount of genetic diversity in the gene pool today suggests that the human population was never smaller than several thousand individuals.  Yet all humans, of all races, are descended from this group.  Humanity is one family.</description>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[<em>Coming Soon</em>]]></content:encoded>
        <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 12 14:34:24 -0700</pubDate>
        <dc:creator></dc:creator>
        <!--<dc:date>Jul 12, 2012 14:34</dc:date>-->
      </item>
            <item>
        <title>What do Biblical scholars today say about Genesis 1&#45;2?</title>
        <link>http://biologos.org/questions/biblical&#45;scholars&#45;genesis?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</link>
        <guid>http://biologos.org/questions/biblical&#45;scholars&#45;genesis?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</guid>
        <description>In recent decades, evangelical Biblical scholars have reconsidered non&#45;literal interpretations of Genesis.   The Accommodation view of St. Augustine and John Calvin is supported by recent discoveries about ancient cultures.  Literature from these cultures shows interesting parallels and differences with Genesis accounts.   The differences are striking, such as stories where creation is a battle among many gods rather than the acts of one sovereign Creator.  The similarities, however, show how God accommodated his message so that the Israelites could understand it.   For example, the Egyptians and Babylonians thought the sky was a solid dome.  This solid dome appears in Genesis 1 as the firmament created on day 2.  God did not try to correct the “science” of the Israelites by explaining that the sky was a gaseous atmosphere.   Instead, God accommodated his message to their cultural context.  Many evangelical Biblical scholars have concluded that Genesis is not meant to teach scientific information.</description>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Coming Soon</em></p>]]></content:encoded>
        <pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 12 12:48:13 -0700</pubDate>
        <dc:creator></dc:creator>
        <!--<dc:date>Mar 15, 2012 12:48</dc:date>-->
      </item>
            <item>
        <title>What is the genetic evidence for evolution?</title>
        <link>http://biologos.org/questions/genetic&#45;evidence?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</link>
        <guid>http://biologos.org/questions/genetic&#45;evidence?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</guid>
        <description>Darwin developed his theory of evolution by looking at scientific evidence available in the mid&#45;1800s.  Since then, the whole field of genetics has developed, adding a powerful independent line of evidence in support of evolution.  Genes show how the physical traits of living things are handed down and modified from one generation to the next.  By comparing the DNA of many organisms, scientists can map the relationships between species.  This map is in remarkable agreement with Darwin’s predictions.  The structure of chromosomes and particular genetic sequences point to the conclusion not just of common design, but common descent as well.</description>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Coming Soon</em></p>]]></content:encoded>
        <pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 12 12:38:52 -0700</pubDate>
        <dc:creator></dc:creator>
        <!--<dc:date>Mar 15, 2012 12:38</dc:date>-->
      </item>
            <item>
        <title>Why should Christians consider evolutionary creation?</title>
        <link>http://biologos.org/questions/why&#45;should&#45;Christians&#45;consider&#45;evolutionary&#45;creation?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</link>
        <guid>http://biologos.org/questions/why&#45;should&#45;Christians&#45;consider&#45;evolutionary&#45;creation?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</guid>
        <description>Because evolution is a challenging subject, many Christians are tempted to simply ignore or reject it.  Yet considering evolutionary creation has important benefits for Christians both in our relationship with the Creator, and with our relationships with other people—believers and non&#45;Christians alike.  First, Christians should study evolution because (like all the natural sciences) it is the study of God’s creation.  Creation itself is a complementary revelation to what is communicated in the Scriptures, and through it God shows how and when he brought about life, to his honor and glory.  Studying the creation is also an invitation into a deeper understanding of the attributes and character of Father, Son and Spirit. Second, considering evolutionary creation aids the Church in its gospel mission, supporting young Christians in their faith, helping answer critics, and equipping us to engage effectively in the wider culture.  An anti&#45;evolution  attitude can harm Christian young people by presenting them with a false choice between pursuing science OR holding to faith.  Similarly, a hostile attitude towards evolution can hinder evangelism when seekers hear that they must reject science to follow Christ.  On the other hand, studying evolution as a God&#45;ordained process helps Christians refute arguments that science encourages an atheistic worldview.  Furthermore, as the church engages front&#45;page issues raised by the rapid growth in science, medicine, and technology, a Christ&#45;centered voice in such areas as bioethics will be stronger if based on a thorough understanding of the natural sciences, including evolution. 
(Updated on September 9, 2012)</description>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[<h3>Why should Christians consider Evolutionary Creation?  </h3>

<p>Some Christians cringe when they hear the word “evolution,” and not without reason: considering evolution as God’s means of creating the life we see around us suggests that we need to revisit some familiar biblical passages and brings up some tough theological questions. Meanwhile, militant atheists repeatedly invoke evolution in the media, trying to discredit Scripture and the Christian faith.  So why focus on such a controversial topic?  We at BioLogos understand that these issues can be difficult, but we believe the church is called to consider evolutionary creation.  For us, this conversation is not just about abstract ideas and academic debates, but about God’s ongoing creation, the faith of individual believers, and the mission of the church.<sup>1</sup>   Here are several points to consider about evolution in light of Christian faith.</p>

<h3>Considering evolution helps us understand God's creation</h3>

<div class="see-also"><img src="/uploads/questions/image-question12-thumb.jpg" height="75" width="75" style="float:left; margin: 0 10px 0 0;">See <a href="http://biologos.org/questions/scientific-and-scriptural-truth">“Can science and scripture be reconciled?”</a></div>

<p>As Christians, we believe that “In the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth” (Genesis 1:1), and that the Bible teaches that God reveals himself to us in the natural world he created (“The heavens declare the glory of God”, Psalm 19:1).   In the study of God’s creation, scientists have discovered tremendous wonders that reach far beyond what the Bible describes—things like quarks, neurons, and galaxies.   Scientists have also discovered abundant evidence of the long history of the universe and of life (including people), which you can read elsewhere on this site.  It is crucial that Christians consider this evidence because it comes from God’s own handiwork in the natural world.   Since we believe that nature declares God’s glory, we cannot stop listening to the created order when it declares something that seems new to us.</p>

<div class="see-also"><img src="/uploads/questions/image-question11-thumb.jpg" height="75" width="75" style="float:left; margin: 0 10px 0 0;">See the category of questions on <a href="http://biologos.org/questions/category/gods-action-in-the-natural-world">God’s action in the natural world</a></div>

<p>At BioLogos, we view evolutionary creation as a description of how and when God brought about all the creatures on earth.   We do not see God as distant from this process, for God did not just set up the universe at the beginning and let it go.   Instead, he upholds the universe moment by moment, sustaining all things by the power of his word.  The regular patterns in nature that we call natural laws have their foundation in the regular, faithful governance of God (see Jeremiah 33:19-26).  Thus we believe that God created every species and did it in such a way that we can describe the creation process scientifically.   The scientific model of evolution does not replace God as creator any more than the law of gravity replaces God as ruler of the planets. </p>

<h3>Considering evolution helps us understand the Creator God </h3>

<div class="see-also"><img src="http://biologos.org/uploads/static-content/awesome_god_video_75px.jpg" alt="" height="75" width="75" style="float:left; margin: 0 10px 0 0;" />A short video of beautiful places on earth that declare <a href="http://biologos.org/blog/our-god-is-an-awesome-god">“Our God is an Awesome God”</a></div>

<p>The created order—nature—also teaches us about the Creator.  The heavens declare the glory of God (Psalm 19:1) and show his eternal power and divine nature (Romans 1:20).   The Bible is our primary source of knowledge about God, and God’s character cannot be derived by looking at nature alone.  But for those who know and trust God as their savior, the created order has the stamp of the Creator all over it.<sup>2</sup> The starry heavens show God’s glory (Psalm 19), the thunderstorm displays God’s power (Psalm 29), and ecosystems show God’s care for plants and animals (Psalm 104:10-18).  Today we know much more about God’s creation than the Biblical authors knew; telescopes and microscopes have expanded our horizons to the very large and the very small.   Through science, we’ve learned how things work and fit together, too.  Joining study and worship, we can think God’s thoughts after him, tracing his hand through the physical laws he used to create our world, marveling at the way he provides for creation as much as at the endless forms most beautiful he has created.<sup>3</sup></p>

<p>Here are three examples of biblical attributes of God emphasized by studying evolutionary science: </p>

<ul><li>God is extravagant.  God did not create just one type of flower, but uses the system of evolution to create a huge variety of flowers, of every size, shape, color, and scent.  As opposed to being “wasteful,” a biblical view of evolution helps us appreciate it as a pointer to the extravagance of God’s loving gift of life to the whole earth.  God’s creation does not reflect a cold efficiency, but the transformation of such “waste” into worship, just as Jesus honored the woman who poured expensive perfume on his feet<sup>4</sup> (Mark 14:3-9, John 12:3-8).</li>

<li>God is patient, and most often works gradually rather than instantaneously.  In the natural world, we see God creating life over billions of years, not instantly, and grand geological processes playing out slowly over time, as well. Similarly, in the Bible we read of the centuries that passed between God’s covenant with Abraham and his covenant with David and the centuries more before Jesus appeared “in the fullness of time” (Galatians 4:4). In individual lives, God often works by planting his Word deep in us and letting it grow slowly over time.  God seems pleased with the slow but extraordinary unfolding of his universe, just as he is patiently unfolding his plan of redemption.<sup>5</sup></li>

<li>God is the provider.  He provides for his creatures in each moment, giving them what they need to survive, adapt and thrive in communities of life.   The Bible speaks of God feeding and caring for animals (Jonah 4:11, Psalm 104), and modern evolutionary science is shedding light on how God has arranged complex ecosystems that support many different kinds of creatures together.  But God provides for his creatures even at the genetic level, giving species a measure of biological “creativity” to help them respond to new challenges. As biologist Richard Colling says, “Evolution is not about the imposition of death and destruction and survival of the fittest.  Those things are a part of it, but not the main core of what evolution is. . . [The] evolutionary process of creating duplicate genes that give rise to new possibilities [is] redemption, it’s possibility, and it’s hope.”<sup>6</sup></li></ul>

<h3>Considering evolution helps the Church confront atheist worldviews</h3>

<p>Considering evolution provides an opportunity to challenge atheistic arguments, rather than supporting them. Evolution is not rightly a philosophy or worldview: it is a scientific model that describes the patterns and rules we see in God’s creation of life—much as gravity describes the interaction he has ordained or planets and stars, or as quantum mechanics describes the relationships between elementary particles of matter. By reasserting that evolution is a description of God’s processes and <em>not</em> a worldview in and of itself, Christians can help show atheism to be secular philosophy and <em>not</em> part of science. </p>

<div class="see-also"><img src="http://biologos.org/uploads/static-content/ian_hutchinson_75px.png" alt="" height="75" width="75" style="float:left; margin: 0 10px 0 0;" />Ian Hutchinson, MIT professor of nuclear engineering, is one believing scientist responding to atheist arguments (<a href="/blog/series/hutchinson-on-atheism">video and blog</a>)</div>

<p>Similarly, we should reject claims that evolution has effectively disproved the existence of God, debunked Christianity, and shown that faith is based on nothing more than superstition, clearly and forcefully refuting such claims in public.   But to be effective in that task, our response should not be to attack what science shows so compellingly about the created order, but again, to expose these atheist arguments as philosophy, rather than science.  Scientific explanations of natural process do <em>not</em> eliminate God or deny his sovereignty over creation, and science cannot prove or disprove the existence of God. But exploring creation with the tools of science can profoundly enhance and support belief in and worship of God, a case that Christian philosophers have been convincingly making in the public square.<sup>7</sup></p>

<h3>Considering evolution helps Christian students to remain strong in their faith</h3>

<p>How should Christians respond to atheist philosophy in the guise of science? Just as Lois and Eunice raised Timothy in the faith (2 Tim 1:5, 3:14-15), so do all Christian parents, pastors, and teachers want to prepare young people to keep their faith strong as they enter university and adult careers.  But while it’s wise to arm young believers against atheistic worldviews, teaching them to ignore the science can unwittingly set young people up for a crisis of faith.<sup>8</sup>  When Christian students encounter the powerful scientific evidence for evolution, many realize their parents and pastors may have been wrong about science and begin to question other beliefs they were taught.  One recent survey shows that a key factor in the evangelical Church losing its credibility among young people is its hostility towards mainstream science and its assertion of young-earth and anti-evolutionary creation models that contradict virtually all of the evidence God is revealing through science.<sup>9</sup></p>

<div class="see-also">Read the testimonies of <a href="/blog/gloriain-excelsis-deo">Joanna</a> and <a href="/blog/saving-anthony">Anthony</a> who grew up with the young earth creationist view and wrestled with their faith upon learning the scientific evidence.   Such young people were a major reason that <a href="/blog/biologuration">Francis Collins founded BioLogos</a>. Karl Giberson <a href="/blog/evolution-matters">writes</a> about the prominent biologist E.O. Wilson who was taught that evolution and faith were incompatible and rejected his faith.   Read <a href="/blog/allaying-parental-fears-about-evolution-education-in-the-public-schools">advice for parents</a> from David Vinson, and watch a <a href="/blog/why-the-origins-debate-matters-for-the-church">short video</a> from Pastor Joel Hunter on raising kids who are truth seekers. Biochemist Sy Garte gives <a href="/blog/stochastic-grace">his testimony</a> of converting from atheism to Christianity.</div>

<p>On the other hand, another <a href="/blog/series/evolution-and-personal-faith-christian-university-students">recent study</a> has shown that biology professors who follow Jesus and accept evolution offer a powerful counter-narrative to those who equate evolution with atheism and can help students find their way forward in faith and prepare them to carry their witness into the wider scientific culture.  If parents and church leaders also emphasized the centrality of Jesus and the gospel and taught that Bible-believing Christians hold an array of views with respect to how God created life, young people would be better equipped to reject atheistic worldviews and inspired to explore God’s creation more deeply. </p>

<h3>Considering evolution aids evangelism among scientists</h3>

<p>Understanding evolution can aid evangelism to those who work in science and technology fields, whereas anti-evolution and anti-science attitudes in the church can hinder evangelism to scientists.  While atheism among scientists is actually less common than the popular stereotype,<sup>10</sup>  a recent study indicated that over 80% of top scientists do not attend worship services regularly and likely do not know Jesus as their Savior, while another found that many top research scientists who had left the faith did so because the church wasn’t welcoming to them or their questions.<sup>11</sup>  Because some Christians claim that evolution must be rejected in order to convert to Christianity or remain a faithful follower of Christ, the Church may become a stumbling block to faith rather that a place to nurture those who are seeking God. Indeed, this argument adds an unbiblical requirement for joining the Body of Christ, much as some in the early church wanted to add the requirement of circumcision for gentiles coming to Christ (Acts 15).</p>

<div class="see-also"><img src="http://biologos.org/uploads/static-content/kepler_75px.jpg" alt="" height="75" width="75" style="float:left; margin: 0 10px 0 0;"/>Meet some top scientists who are Christians, from the past and the present (<a href="/blog/no-room-at-the-inn">blog</a>)</div>

<p>On the contrary, the Church’s support of scientists both inside and outside the church advances the Kingdom.  One of the most powerful responses to academic atheism occurs when believing scientists pray for and care for their non-Christian colleagues<sup>12</sup> (Matthew 5:43-48), and atheistic or agnostic scientists are more likely to listen to the good news from a fellow scientist they know and respect. The small percentage of scientists who are evangelical believers need the prayers and support of their brothers and sister in Christ to effectively share their faith with their co-workers. Furthermore, Churches—especially those near universities and high-tech industries—can strengthen their missions outreach <em>and</em> edify their congregations by actively inviting scientists, technicians, and engineers from their communities to church. Learning about the daily lives of scientists<sup>13</sup> in this way not only shows hospitality and the love of Christ to an “unreached people,” it helps congregations cultivate their own sense of wonder and curiosity about the God’s creation.<sup>14</sup></p>


<h3>Considering evolution helps the church engage culture</h3>

<div class="see-also"><img src="http://biologos.org/uploads/resources/guiness_no_fear.jpg" alt="" height="75" width="110"  />Os Guinness explains why the church has nothing to fear when considering science. (<a href="http://biologos.org/blog/no-fear">blog</a>)</div>

<p>Because today’s culture is saturated with science and technology—from the latest communication gadgets to new medical imaging methods to discoveries of fundamental particles and biotechnology—engaging culture means engaging science.  Christians should be a compelling and relevant voice on science issues in the public square—especially in discerning appropriate use of new technologies.  Many such innovations touch on our understanding of the processes and interrelation of life on earth described by evolutionary science.  Especially in the field of bioethics, Christian voices are critical to rightly discerning questions about the development of stem cells, the use of DNA information, and care for the aged and disabled.  </p>

<p>But to be compelling and relevant, Christians need to be well-informed.   When Christians speak from ignorance about scientific research, we harm the reputation of the whole church and invite mockery.   This was an issue even in the days of Saint Augustine (354-386 A.D.), who wrote, “It is a disgraceful and dangerous thing for an unbeliever to hear a Christian, presumably giving the meaning of Holy Scripture, talking nonsense . . . in a field [the unbeliever] himself knows well.”    Today, evangelical Christians can show that we love God’s work in the created order, take up full participation in cutting-edge research, and advocate science as a tool to protect rather than prey upon the helpless (Proverbs 6:16-17).</p>

<p>Why should Christians consider evolutionary creation? Because we recognize that nature is God’s creation, declaring the glory, extravagance, and loving care of the Creator; because rightly understanding evolution helps us to refute atheist worldviews and support the faith of those called to explore creation through the sciences; and because it strengthens the voice of Church in the public square.</p>]]></content:encoded>
        <pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 12 12:12:54 -0700</pubDate>
        <dc:creator></dc:creator>
        <!--<dc:date>Mar 15, 2012 12:12</dc:date>-->
      </item>
            <item>
        <title>Seeking a Signature</title>
        <link>http://biologos.org/essays/seeking&#45;a&#45;signature?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</link>
        <guid>http://biologos.org/essays/seeking&#45;a&#45;signature?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</guid>
        <description>In this article, Venema offers his review of Stephen Meyer&apos;s book Signature in the Cell.</description>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[In this article, Venema offers his review of Stephen Meyer's book <em>Signature in the Cell</em>.]]></content:encoded>
        <pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 11 15:14:01 -0700</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>Dennis Venema</dc:creator>
        <!--<dc:date>Oct 19, 2011 15:14</dc:date>-->
      </item>
            <item>
        <title>Genesis and the Genome</title>
        <link>http://biologos.org/essays/genesis&#45;and&#45;the&#45;genome?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</link>
        <guid>http://biologos.org/essays/genesis&#45;and&#45;the&#45;genome?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</guid>
        <description>This article provides an overview of genomics evidence for common ancestry and hominid population sizes, and briefly discusses the implications of these lines of evidence for scientific concordist approaches to the Genesis narratives.</description>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[This article provides an overview of genomics evidence for common ancestry and hominid population sizes, and briefly discusses the implications of these lines of evidence for scientific concordist approaches to the Genesis narratives.]]></content:encoded>
        <pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 11 15:09:09 -0700</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>Dennis Venema</dc:creator>
        <!--<dc:date>Oct 19, 2011 15:09</dc:date>-->
      </item>
            <item>
        <title>Evolution and the Origin of Biological Information</title>
        <link>http://biologos.org/essays/evolution&#45;and&#45;the&#45;origin&#45;of&#45;biological&#45;information?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</link>
        <guid>http://biologos.org/essays/evolution&#45;and&#45;the&#45;origin&#45;of&#45;biological&#45;information?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</guid>
        <description>In this paper, Venema explores several examples in biology where random mutation and natural selection have indeed led to substantial increases in biological information. The question of how new specified information arises in DNA, far from being an “enigma”, is one of great interest to biologists.</description>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[In this paper, Venema explores several examples in biology where random mutation and natural selection have indeed led to substantial increases in biological information. The question of how new specified information arises in DNA, far from being an “enigma”, is one of great interest to biologists. ]]></content:encoded>
        <pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 11 14:48:05 -0700</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>Dennis Venema</dc:creator>
        <!--<dc:date>Oct 19, 2011 14:48</dc:date>-->
      </item>
            <item>
        <title>From Intelligent Design to BioLogos</title>
        <link>http://biologos.org/essays/from&#45;intelligent&#45;design&#45;to&#45;biologos?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</link>
        <guid>http://biologos.org/essays/from&#45;intelligent&#45;design&#45;to&#45;biologos?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</guid>
        <description>In this paper, Venema tells the story of his transition from support of Intelligent Design to the view that God uses evolution as a creative mechanism.</description>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[In this paper, Venema tells the story of his transition from support of Intelligent Design to the view that God uses evolution as a creative mechanism.]]></content:encoded>
        <pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 11 14:17:25 -0700</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>Dennis Venema</dc:creator>
        <!--<dc:date>Oct 19, 2011 14:17</dc:date>-->
      </item>
            <item>
        <title>The BioLogos Foundation and &quot;Darwin&apos;s Pious Idea&quot;</title>
        <link>http://biologos.org/essays/the&#45;biologos&#45;foundation&#45;and&#45;darwins&#45;pious&#45;idea?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</link>
        <guid>http://biologos.org/essays/the&#45;biologos&#45;foundation&#45;and&#45;darwins&#45;pious&#45;idea?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</guid>
        <description>In this paper, theologian John Wesley Wright reviews Connor Cunningham&apos;s book Darwin&apos;s Pious Idea, a work that deeply explores the integration of Darwinian evolutionary theory and Christian faith.</description>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[In this paper, theologian John Wesley Wright reviews Connor Cunningham's book <em>Darwin's Pious Idea</em>, a work that deeply explores the integration of Darwinian evolutionary theory and Christian faith.]]></content:encoded>
        <pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 11 13:50:46 -0700</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>John Wesley Wright</dc:creator>
        <!--<dc:date>Oct 19, 2011 13:50</dc:date>-->
      </item>
            <item>
        <title>Understanding Adam</title>
        <link>http://biologos.org/essays/understanding&#45;adam?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</link>
        <guid>http://biologos.org/essays/understanding&#45;adam?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</guid>
        <description>In this paper, Pete Enns looks at from a unique angle to some: Adam is the beginning of Israel, not humanity. He follows through with how this line of thinking affects our reading of the Genesis account.</description>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[In this paper, Pete Enns looks at from a unique angle to some: Adam is the beginning of Israel, not humanity. He follows through with how this line of thinking affects our reading of the Genesis account.]]></content:encoded>
        <pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 11 13:33:48 -0700</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>Pete Enns</dc:creator>
        <!--<dc:date>Oct 19, 2011 13:33</dc:date>-->
      </item>
            <item>
        <title>&quot;Come and See&quot;: A Christological Invitation for Science</title>
        <link>http://biologos.org/essays/come&#45;and&#45;see?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</link>
        <guid>http://biologos.org/essays/come&#45;and&#45;see?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</guid>
        <description>This chapter from Mark Noll&apos;s book Jesus Christ and the Life of the Mind seeks to understand science through a Christ&#45;centered lens.  Overall, if one accepts that nature is created and sustained by Jesus Christ, the author explains, then one must conclude that looking at nature is, in fact, the best way to learn about nature.</description>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[This chapter from Mark Noll's book <em>Jesus Christ and the Life of the Mind</em> seeks to understand science through a Christ-centered lens.  Overall, if one accepts that nature is created and sustained by Jesus Christ, the author explains, then one must conclude that looking at nature is, in fact, the best way to learn about nature.]]></content:encoded>
        <pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 11 12:43:35 -0700</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>Mark Noll</dc:creator>
        <!--<dc:date>Oct 19, 2011 12:43</dc:date>-->
      </item>
            <item>
        <title>The Collapsing Universe in the Bible</title>
        <link>http://biologos.org/essays/the&#45;collapsing&#45;universe&#45;in&#45;the&#45;bible?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</link>
        <guid>http://biologos.org/essays/the&#45;collapsing&#45;universe&#45;in&#45;the&#45;bible?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</guid>
        <description>In this essay, Godawa argues that the decreation language of a collapsing universe with falling stars and signs in the heavens was actually symbolic discourse about world&#45;changing events and powers related to the end of the old covenant and the coming of the new covenant as God’s “new world order.” In this interpretation, predictions of the collapsing universe were figuratively fulfilled in the historic past of the first century.</description>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[In this essay, Godawa argues that the decreation language of a collapsing universe with falling stars and signs in the heavens was actually symbolic discourse about world-changing events and powers related to the end of the old covenant and the coming of the new covenant as God’s “new world order.” In this interpretation, predictions of the collapsing universe were figuratively fulfilled in the historic past of the first century.]]></content:encoded>
        <pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 11 12:25:42 -0700</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>Brian Godawa</dc:creator>
        <!--<dc:date>Oct 19, 2011 12:25</dc:date>-->
      </item>
            <item>
        <title>C.S. Lewis on Evolution and Intelligent Design</title>
        <link>http://biologos.org/essays/c.s.&#45;lewis&#45;on&#45;evolution&#45;and&#45;intelligent&#45;design?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</link>
        <guid>http://biologos.org/essays/c.s.&#45;lewis&#45;on&#45;evolution&#45;and&#45;intelligent&#45;design?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</guid>
        <description>This article is a comprehensive study of the views of Christian author and apologist C. S. Lewis on the theory of evolution and the argument from intelligent design. It explains how he would distinguish expressly philosophical arguments for a Transcendent Mind from the current claims of the intelligent design (ID) movement to provide scientific evidence for such a reality.</description>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[This article is a comprehensive study of the views of Christian author and apologist C. S. Lewis on the theory of evolution and the argument from intelligent design. It explains how he would distinguish expressly philosophical arguments for a Transcendent Mind from the current claims of the intelligent design (ID) movement to provide scientific evidence for such a reality.]]></content:encoded>
        <pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 11 12:06:04 -0700</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>Michael L. Peterson</dc:creator>
        <!--<dc:date>Oct 19, 2011 12:06</dc:date>-->
      </item>
            <item>
        <title>Science as an Instrument of Worship</title>
        <link>http://biologos.org/essays/science&#45;as&#45;an&#45;instrument&#45;of&#45;worship?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</link>
        <guid>http://biologos.org/essays/science&#45;as&#45;an&#45;instrument&#45;of&#45;worship?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</guid>
        <description>NASA astronomer Jennifer Wiseman asserts that studying creation can show us the nature of God; science can inform us of what we need to do as stewards of God&amp;rsquo;s creation; understanding the natural world gives us a deeper knowledge of Jesus Christ; and science can give us a better understanding of ourselves. This essay was presented at the November 2009 Theology of Celebration Workshop.</description>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[NASA astronomer Jennifer Wiseman asserts that studying creation can show us the nature of God; science can inform us of what we need to do as stewards of God&rsquo;s creation; understanding the natural world gives us a deeper knowledge of Jesus Christ; and science can give us a better understanding of ourselves. This essay was presented at the November 2009 Theology of Celebration Workshop.]]></content:encoded>
        <pubDate>Mon, 02 May 11 19:10:34 -0700</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>Jennifer Wiseman</dc:creator>
        <!--<dc:date>May 02, 2011 19:10</dc:date>-->
      </item>
            <item>
        <title>Barriers to Accepting Creation by an Evolutionary Process: Concerns of the Evangelical Theologian</title>
        <link>http://biologos.org/essays/barriers&#45;to&#45;accepting&#45;creation&#45;by&#45;an&#45;evolutionary&#45;process&#45;I?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</link>
        <guid>http://biologos.org/essays/barriers&#45;to&#45;accepting&#45;creation&#45;by&#45;an&#45;evolutionary&#45;process&#45;I?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</guid>
        <description>Renowned Old Testament scholar Bruce Waltke considers eleven barriers that prevent evangelical theologians from accepting evolution as a possible means of creation and what these barriers tell us about the tensions perceived by many Evangelicals between science and faith. Waltke&apos;s work was based on a survey sent to members of the Fellowship of Evangelical Seminary Presidents and their faculty.</description>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[Renowned Old Testament scholar Bruce Waltke considers eleven barriers that prevent evangelical theologians from accepting evolution as a possible means of creation and what these barriers tell us about the tensions perceived by many Evangelicals between science and faith. Waltke's work was based on a survey sent to members of the Fellowship of Evangelical Seminary Presidents and their faculty.]]></content:encoded>
        <pubDate>Mon, 02 May 11 19:04:27 -0700</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>Bruce Waltke</dc:creator>
        <!--<dc:date>May 02, 2011 19:04</dc:date>-->
      </item>
            <item>
        <title>An Evangelical Geneticist&apos;s Critique of Reasons to Believe&apos;s Testable Creation Model</title>
        <link>http://biologos.org/essays/an&#45;evangelical&#45;geneticists&#45;critique&#45;of&#45;reasons&#45;to&#45;believes&#45;testable&#45;creatio?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</link>
        <guid>http://biologos.org/essays/an&#45;evangelical&#45;geneticists&#45;critique&#45;of&#45;reasons&#45;to&#45;believes&#45;testable&#45;creatio?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</guid>
        <description>Biologist and BioLogos Senior Fellow Denis Venema examines the interaction between RTB literature and several lines of genetics&#45;based evidence for common ancestry. In so doing, he also addresses the scientific robustness and reliability of the RTB model.</description>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[Biologist and BioLogos Senior Fellow Denis Venema examines the interaction between RTB literature and several lines of genetics-based evidence for common ancestry. In so doing, he also addresses the scientific robustness and reliability of the RTB model.]]></content:encoded>
        <pubDate>Mon, 02 May 11 19:02:57 -0700</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>Dennis Venema</dc:creator>
        <!--<dc:date>May 02, 2011 19:02</dc:date>-->
      </item>
            <item>
        <title>Metaphor, Mystery, and Paradox at the Confluence of Science and Faith</title>
        <link>http://biologos.org/essays/metaphor&#45;mystery&#45;and&#45;paradox&#45;at&#45;the&#45;confluence&#45;of&#45;science&#45;and&#45;faith?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</link>
        <guid>http://biologos.org/essays/metaphor&#45;mystery&#45;and&#45;paradox&#45;at&#45;the&#45;confluence&#45;of&#45;science&#45;and&#45;faith?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</guid>
        <description>Artist and BioLogos Senior Fellow Mark Sprinkle considers the role mystery plays in both science and faith, and why basing one&apos;s faith purely on reason in fact contributes to a rationalist view of the world rejected by many Christians.</description>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[Artist and BioLogos Senior Fellow Mark Sprinkle considers the role mystery plays in both science and faith, and why basing one's faith purely on reason in fact contributes to a rationalist view of the world rejected by many Christians.]]></content:encoded>
        <pubDate>Mon, 02 May 11 19:00:40 -0700</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>Mark Sprinkle</dc:creator>
        <!--<dc:date>May 02, 2011 19:00</dc:date>-->
      </item>
            <item>
        <title>Faithful Poetics and Christian Knowledge of the World</title>
        <link>http://biologos.org/essays/faithful&#45;poetics&#45;and&#45;christian&#45;knowledge&#45;of&#45;the&#45;world?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</link>
        <guid>http://biologos.org/essays/faithful&#45;poetics&#45;and&#45;christian&#45;knowledge&#45;of&#45;the&#45;world?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</guid>
        <description>Artist and BioLogos Senior Fellow Mark Sprinkle describes the importance of acknowledging the creative and subjective aspects of human knowledge in the midst of the debates about the relationship between science and faith.</description>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[Artist and BioLogos Senior Fellow Mark Sprinkle describes the importance of acknowledging the creative and subjective aspects of human knowledge in the midst of the debates about the relationship between science and faith.]]></content:encoded>
        <pubDate>Mon, 02 May 11 18:59:47 -0700</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>Mark Sprinkle</dc:creator>
        <!--<dc:date>May 02, 2011 18:59</dc:date>-->
      </item>
            <item>
        <title>Accommodationist and Proud of It</title>
        <link>http://biologos.org/essays/accommodationist&#45;and&#45;proud&#45;of&#45;it?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</link>
        <guid>http://biologos.org/essays/accommodationist&#45;and&#45;proud&#45;of&#45;it?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication</guid>
        <description>Science and religion scholar Michael Ruse gives a personal account of his experiences as an author and public speaker on the compatibility of Christianity and biological evolution.</description>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[Science and religion scholar Michael Ruse gives a personal account of his experiences as an author and public speaker on the compatibility of Christianity and biological evolution.]]></content:encoded>
        <pubDate>Mon, 02 May 11 18:53:59 -0700</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>Michael Ruse</dc:creator>
        <!--<dc:date>May 02, 2011 18:53</dc:date>-->
      </item>
      

      

    
  </channel>
</rss>