The heavens declare the glory of God...The law of the Lord is perfect, refreshing the soul. Psalm 19:1, 7 (NIV)
In Christian belief, God reveals himself in both the written book of the Bible and the created “book” of the natural world. Because of the consistent character of God, these two cannot conflict. Yet at times they seem to say contradictory things to us about the origin and shape of God’s creation. What do we do when the results of science disagree with common biblical interpretations?
One response is to say that the Bible is right and science is wrong, but this often elevates a particular biblical interpretation to the authority of the Bible itself. Scripture is always given and received within a cultural context. As we attempt to understand the Bible in today’s context, Christians sometimes disagree on the meaning of particular passages. Some scriptural teachings, like the accounts of Jesus’ death and resurrection, have clear meanings that have been affirmed by the church throughout the centuries and around the world. Other teachings, like the baptism of adults vs. infants, are ambiguous and their interpretation has been debated for centuries. Some interpretations have been challenged and changed as Christians re-evaluated them in light of the whole of Scripture (the ownership of slaves serves as a dramatic example). Church tradition has also been appropriately challenged as new historical or scientific evidence presents itself. Consider the scientific work of Galileo, which overturned an earth-centered worldview and thus irrevocably affected our interpretation of passages like Psalm 93:1.
Just as the Bible is always interpreted by fallible humans, so too science is the human interpretation of nature. Thus, its theories are subject to critique and revision. A good example is the racist ideas of “eugenics” in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, which were rightly questioned by many Bible-believing Christians. But science also has internal methods for reviewing evidence and weeding out errors (eugenics was eventually rejected by mainstream science). After theories are tested and refined by many scientists all over the world, they give an ever more reliable interpretation of physical reality. This is true of many aspects of evolutionary theory, which have been tested and confirmed by numerous scientists in many fields over a long period of time.
Scientific data can sometimes serve as God’s way of warning us when we are standing too close to the scriptural “picture,” or at the wrong angle, or with the wrong expectations. The purpose of science is not to verify nor to add to inspired Scripture, but science can help us eliminate improper ways of reading it. Likewise, Christians should thoughtfully and appropriately encourage science to rigorously test its own theories and question its own assumptions, especially when science appears to contradict Scripture. Yet because they are both means of God’s revelation of himself to us, they must work together towards an ultimate harmony.
Further Reading
-
Science and the Bible: Assessing the Evangelical Encounter with Evolution
| Ted DavisScience and the Bible: Assessing the Evangelical Encounter with Evolution | Ted DavisBlog PostHaving now completed our study of the five main views about “Science and the Bible” held by conservative Protestants, I conclude with a final column, assessing the whole s... Read More >
-
Science and the Scripture with John Walton
Science and the Scripture with John WaltonAudio Visual
Science and the Scripture Conversation with: John Walton In this video, John Walton discusses the problem of trying to integrate ancient scripture with our modern worldview. He notes... Read More >
-
What is a Literal Reading?: Lessons from Gregory of Nyssa and Augustine
| Craig D. AllertWhat is a Literal Reading?: Lessons from Gregory of Nyssa and Augustine | Craig D. AllertBlog PostA very important way of avoiding a myopic understanding of our own theories and conclusions is to examine how our forebears in the faith understood things. Read More >
-
Are Scientists Biased by Their Worldviews?
| Deborah HaarsmaAre Scientists Biased by Their Worldviews? | Deborah HaarsmaBlog PostThe competing models and arguments may have originated in differing worldview beliefs, but eventually the experiments and observations push the scientific community toward a consensus... Read More >
-
The Reliability of Historical Science
| Loren HaarsmaThe Reliability of Historical Science | Loren HaarsmaBlog PostScience is better described as a process by which people gain that knowledge. Let’s examine three methods used to gain scientific knowledge: experimental, observational, and his... Read More >
Notes
Further reading
Science and the Bible: Concordism, Part 1
What Do You Mean by ‘Literal’?
Is that all?: Reflecting on a Christian Reading of Genesis
The Reliability of Historical Science
Are Scientists Biased by Their Worldviews?
Should Christians Trust Scientific Experts?
- Stephen Blake, Filmmaker and President of Realm EntertainmentBioLogos is one of the very most important ministries in existence today because it so effectively addresses a formidable crisis the Church faces. As militant skeptics wield science to destroy the faith of believers, BioLogos exposes the unscientific philosophical presuppositions behind their arguments while vividly demonstrating the consonance between what God has revealed in His Word and what He reveals as we explore His creation (science = the exploration of God’s creation).