The Questions Update: How have Christians responded to Darwin’s “Origin of Species”?

Bookmark and Share

August 5, 2012 Tags: Christianity & Science - Then and Now

Today's entry was written by the BioLogos Editorial Team. You can read more about what we believe here.

The Questions Update: How have Christians responded to Darwin’s “Origin of Species”?

Note: The BioLogos Foundation began in 2009 with The Questions, a resource for making sense of frequently-asked questions in the science-and-faith dialogue. Since then, the BioLogos website has grown into a key point of entry into the wider conversation on science and faith. The Questions landing page now draws readers all over the world; between December 2011 and May 2012, it received more than 21,000 views. Since spring 2012 we've been updating this important resource in project led by Senior Web Consultant and Writer Deb Haarsma. We've improved navigation throughout this section of the website to help readers find the topics they want, and we've added a "nutshell" answer to every question to give readers a brief overview. Finally, we’ve been revisiting the texts of the original answers, one by one. Each answer is being updated to reflect the latest and best thinking in both science and theology, with links to new BioLogos blogs and videos that have appeared in the last three years. You'll see an "Updated" date near the top of each question that has undergone a major revision.

We’ve recently been exploring how devout Christians such as David Lack and Asa Gray have played central roles in the development of evolutionary biology. Today’s post features a preview of the updated Question, “How have Christians responded to Darwin’s Origin of Species revised by BioLogos associate editor Thomas Burnett and Senior Fellow Ted Davis. This question provides an overview of the issue and points readers to more resources within and beyond the BioLogos website.


Many believe that before Darwin published The Origin of Species in 1859, Christians as a whole maintained an entirely literal, six-day interpretation of Genesis in which the earth was only a few thousand years old. In fact, however, the idea of an old earth had already become increasingly popular among Christians throughout the half century leading up to The Origin of Species. 1

Another misconception is that the arrival of Darwin’s theory led the scientific and theological communities to immediately take up positions opposing each other. But history reveals that one of the earliest supporters of evolutionary theory in the American scientific community was a devout Christian botanist named Asa Gray. And among theologians, BB Warfield—an architect of the contemporary evangelical understanding of biblical inerrancy—believed that certain forms of evolution were also compatible with a high view of Scripture.

The First Christian Response to Origin of Species in America

Darwin did not invent the idea of evolution. By the time The Origin of Species was published, the idea of evolution in many natural processes was already popular, and the term development was used in its place for discussions of society’s change or the history of the solar system.2 What’s more, it was widely accepted that the earth was much older than previously thought. Most of the groundwork for this understanding resulted from geological work done earlier that century. Through meticulous study of the fossil record, naturalists helped spread the view that the earth was old rather than young.

Though many people like to focus on Christian hostility to evolutionary theory, a careful look at history reveals some surprising facts. For instance, the first American scientist to carefully review and publically support Darwin’s Origin of Species was a devout Christian named Asa Gray, now regarded as one of the most prominent American biologists of the 19th century. A shy person who avoided politics, Gray worked quietly and does not have the same name recognition as scientists like Louis Agassiz and T.H. Huxley—both flamboyant self-promoters who provoked public debate. But, his brilliant research during his 30-year career at Harvard University helped usher in the era of modern biology in the United States.


Asa Gray made his commitment to Christ in 1835, a few years after completing medical school (much like Francis Collins of our own era). 3 As a professing Christian, Gray was a committed churchgoer and member of a local congregation in Cambridge, Massachusetts. As a professional scientist, he insisted that science was neutral in matters of religion and metaphysics. Gray found evolutionary theory incredibly stimulating to his scientific research, but never found it threatening to his faith. Both before and after reading Origin of Species, Gray remained firmly grounded in the Nicene Creed, a profession of faith that Christians have shared since the early Church. 4

What happened when Origin of Species burst onto the scene? Gray’s extensive research on American and Japanese plants—which he published after corresponding with Charles Darwin—had already convinced him that species and genera found in both countries resulted from common ancestry, not separate creations. He responded to Darwin’s book by writing the first major review5 of Origin on his side of the Atlantic, and he defended Darwin’s scientific theory in a series of meetings of the American Association for the Advancement of Science in 1859 and 1860. Gray was determined that Origin would get a fair reading from the scientific community, and he even took a leading role in negotiations to reprint Origin in the United States in 1860, ensuring that Americans could have the most accurate edition in their hands.

Regarding the theological implications of evolution, Gray believed that Darwin’s theory was not atheistic, although he recognized that some would use it as an “excuse” for unbelief. Henceforth, he concluded, we need “to reshape” the argument from design “in such wise as to harmonize our ineradicable belief in design with the fundamental scientific belief of continuity in nature, now extended to organic as well as inorganic forms, to living beings as well as inanimate things.” The question of whether or not life evolves should not be confused with the issue of God’s existence. Instead, Gray thought that each issue should be investigated using methods appropriate to the subject of inquiry. His refusal to argue for either extreme in this contentious debate upset both anti-evolutionists and radical popularizers of science, both of whom were eager to believe that evolution implied atheism.6

For more, be sure to read the full FAQ "How have Christians responded to Darwin’s Origin of Species?" in our Questions section!


  1. Two of the most insightful books dealing with the discovery of Earth’s antiquity are Paolo Rossi’s The Dark Abyss of Time: The History of the Earth and the History of Nations from Hooke to Vico (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1984); and Rhoda Rappaport’s When Geologists Were Historians, 1665-1750. (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1997).
  2. David N. Livingstone, Darwin’s Forgotten Defenders: The Encounter Between Evangelical Theology and Evolutionary Thought (Grand Rapids, MI: W. B. Eerdmans, 1987), xi. (book info)
  3. Francis Collins’ conversion to Christianity is described in his book The Language of God: A Scientist Presents Evidence for his Belief (New York: Free Press, 2007) (book info)
  4. Dupree, A. H. Asa Gray: American Botanist, Friend of Darwin. (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1988)
  5. Asa Gray, “Darwin on the Origin of Species”, in The Atlantic, July 1860 (html).
  6. Asa Gray, Natural Science and Religion: Two Lectures Delivered to the Theological School of Yale College (C. Scribner's Sons, 1880) (html). Asa Gray, Darwiniana; Essays and Reviews Pertaining to Darwinism (D. Appleton 1884) (html)

Share your thoughts

Have a comment or question for the author? We'd love to hear from you.

View the archived discussion of this post

This article is now closed for new comments. The archived comments are shown below.

Page 1 of 1   1
wesseldawn - #71804

August 8th 2012

Darwin did not invent the idea of evolution…

No, but Darwin got all the trouble for it and is considered to be the ‘father’ of evolutionary theory. 

Gray found evolutionary theory incredibly stimulating to his scientific research, but never found it threatening to his faith.

I wonder what all the fuss is these days then because most assuredly there are strong divisions within Christianity over evolutionary theory? 

I wonder too how Gray reconciled the Biblical origin of man with evolutionary theory?

wesseldawn - #71876

August 13th 2012

What I meant to ask is did Gray “think that man’s ancestor was a primate” as Darwin believed?

Page 1 of 1   1