The Benefit of Doubt

June 30, 2010
Category: BioLogos Features

The Benefit of Doubt

"Science and the Sacred" frequently features essays from The BioLogos Foundation's leaders and Senior Fellows. Today's entry was written by Pete Enns. Pete Enns is Senior Fellow of Biblical Studies for The BioLogos Foundation and author of several books and commentaries, including the popular Inspiration and Incarnation: Evangelicals and the Problem of the Old Testament, which looks at three questions raised by biblical scholars that seem to threaten traditional views of Scripture.

No one I know likes to be in a state of doubt. Doubt is destabilizing and we do whatever we can to avoid it. This is all the more true when it comes to matters of faith. Doubt and faith rule each other out. It is one or the other. And if you are in a state of doubt, your job is to get rid of it.

Doubt is an assault on faith. We know this because doubts lead to such destructive emotions as fear, depression, anger, irritability, and stress.

Clearly, God does not want us to doubt. Right?

Wrong.

There is a benefit of doubt. Doubt is a gift of God to move us from trusting ourselves to trusting him.

Doubt forces us to examine what we believe about God—and this can be unsettling. What we thought was our “faith in God” sometimes winds up being little more than faith in ourselves—our own ability to grasp God, to possess him our way, to have him figured out.

Doubt is God’s way of tearing down the private fantasy we have constructed about him—where what we think about God is without further need of reflection, no longer open to growth. Doubt does not mean that God is “dying” for us. Doubt signals that we are beginning to die to ourselves, and that can be very painful—dying usually is.

In the words of some theologians, doubt helps tear down the idols we have constructed in making God into our own image. Or, to borrow a term from psychology, doubt helps us see the bankruptcy of our false self, which is that self we have made up to cope with the confusion of life, to put all things—even God—“in order.” Doubt backs us into a corner and forces us to look beyond the dysfunction of our false selves, of the “idols of our heart,” toward a greater intimacy with God where he is in control, not we.

Do not resist doubt but patiently and honestly pass through it. Welcome it as a gift. Ask God what he might be teaching you about him, and about yourself.

You are not alone. Read the Psalms of lament where doubt is a plaguing reality. Read Ecclesiastes where Qoheleth’s entire universe of meaning is crumbling before him and he shakes his fist at God himself. Read about Job, whose personal narrative is being erased and rewritten before his eyes.

These three biblical examples are not there to warn us but instead to model for us what this process of destabilization and disorientation can look like. Core-shaking doubt is a normal part of the spiritual life. Passing through these times—not around them—leads to greater spiritual depth and intimacy with God.

The 16th century mystic theologian John of the Cross spoke famously of the “dark night of the soul.” This dark night is the sense of painful alienation and distance from God that causes much distress, anxiety, and depression in the believer. Sooner or later all Christians experience this state, and when they do some feel like giving up. Since God feels so far away, since they have lost their sense of belonging to God in that old familiar way, they conclude that they no longer have faith. And so they despair even more.

But like a church bell on a clear winter night, it is in the crisp darkness of doubt that God’s voice carries farther and more clearly. St. John’s great insight is that this dark night is a special sign of God’s presence, where our false sense of comfort is being stripped away and we are left naked before God and asked simply to trust. Then we begin to see that “alienation from God” was nothing of the sort. The dark night is God telling to us to let go of the small version of God we have been carrying around and to prepare for something deeper.

Rachel Held Evans says it well: “In the end, it was doubt that saved my faith.”1 She reminds us that the Christian life is a journey: we must learn to “live in the questions.” We will then learn to expect from God not the promise of ready answers, but the promise to move us out of our carefully crafted zones of comfort to a better place.

For some, thinking through the issues of evolution and Christianity trigger feelings of doubt. For others the issues are very different. But the point is the same. Something enters your life that you did not expect, and do not particularly welcome. You are so racked with doubt that you do not know how you can take another step, or why you should even bother at all. That is not the end of faith. That is when the journey can begin in earnest.

Being a Christian does not mean being certain of everything all the time. Doubt is a normal and important part of the Christian life. When God seems most absent, it may be then that he is speaking to you most clearly. It is then that you realize that your faith is not a fortress but a journey, and God means to take you “further up and further in.”

Notes

1. Rachel Held Evans, Evolving in Monkey Town (Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 2010), 119.

Filed Under:
doubt, faith, Christianity, God, trust, spiritual growth

Share |

Comments (50)
For the latest comments, subscribe to our Comment RSS feed. See a comment that violates our Commenting Guidelines? Use the "Report Inappropriate Comment" tool in the upper-right corner.


  1. dopderbeck - #19537

    June 30th 2010

    Amen!  Love the Aslan quote!

  2. Craig L. Adams - #19540

    June 30th 2010

    Wonderful, well written post. I would add that it is helpful at times to doubt your doubts, too.

  3. beaglelady - #19561

    June 30th 2010

    The rector of my church likes to remind us from time to time that doubt is part of faith.

  4. Morriboy - #19572

    June 30th 2010

    Amen also. What is the Aslan quote?

  5. Charlie - #19577

    June 30th 2010

    You can believe (or doubt) something based on either faith or scientific evidence.  Believing or doubting is an opinion based on the mechanism by which it was formed (faith or evidence).

    Look at faith; it leads to beliefs and doubts.  Belief: God exists.  Doubt: God does not exist.  Where did the idea that doubt and faith rule each other out come from?  People of faith doubt a whole bunch of stuff, (other religions, and in some instances scientifically proven stuff).

    Look at science.  The scientific community believes in something if a sufficient amount of evidence supports it and doubts something if there is sufficient evidence refuting it.  Yet there is a gradient between these two ends of the spectrum where everything really lies because determining what a sufficient amount of evidence is, is different for every person (just ask the editors from different scientific journals).

  6. crawfish - #19592

    June 30th 2010

    This is one of the best articles I’ve read on this site!

  7. Mark - #19593

    June 30th 2010

    Sure doubt can have some benefit.  But those who are truly struggling with sever doubt and unbelief can have a hard time seeing the silver lining of doubt.  Many who go through sever doubt lose there faith forever. Also doubt/unbelief can cause much turmoil and ruin relationship.  So I would say be very careful about doubt.  It is a fire that will quickly burn you alive.

  8. Michael Thompson - #19596

    June 30th 2010

    Faith and doubt are two sides of the same coin. You can’t have faith without doubt, if one was sure of everything, no faith would be needed. But then we could not please God, because without faith it is impossible, right? So ultimatley, Doubt is a good thing, perhaps even a gift from God! But I also agree with Mark, it can be dangerous! Don’t just give in at let it take over! Keeping the faith sure is a battle!

    MT

  9. DWDMD - #19623

    June 30th 2010

    This article resonated with me as well, due to my own story. One thing that has comforted me in all my struggles over whether to make the decision for faith in Jesus was the thought that at least I CARED about the issue. God’s worst enemy is apathy, not doubt. Those who doubt care enough to work toward an answer; as opposed to those self-satisfied churchgoers who accept everything superficially, since it makes no difference to their lives anyway. For me, it was Jesus’ command to “Follow me” which has given me the most peace. I can do that,even though I am still very unsure of many doctrinal .
    Thanks for bringing this up, Pete.

    Diane

  10. DWDMD - #19624

    June 30th 2010

    oops, doctrinal Issues.

  11. Sam - #19628

    June 30th 2010

    I do happen to agree with much of what is in this article.  However, I would also emphasize that having a community of believers around you can help as well.  Prayer and sincere seeking is definitely important, but to have others around you to help you out in your doubts and fears is also something to help you out.

  12. like a child - #19649

    July 1st 2010

    I’m the person that had a ? about a faith-crisis at the Biologos talk. I managed to earn a PhD in the sciences retaining some inkling of faith, but mostly due to being heavily involved in other “intellectual” pursuits.  It was in the intellectual calm of raising two children that my doubts flared - particularly due to trying to teach my children about the Bible but questioning the stories I was teaching them.  The doubts intensified over the last year due to church issues, & I decided to confront the doubts before I needed to give an answer to my children.  The slippery slope you alluded to is very real and I’m hanging by a thread.  As you’ve written, my hope is that these doubts are a path to greater faith.  But while comforted by the fact that doubts can be a blessing, I’m still left with the despair of the doubts and how to persevere—what do I hang on to?  While ascribing to evolution and liking the incarnation model, I’m left to question the New Testament. I’d love to “just believe” in miracles, but it is easier said than done.  Some Biologos articles or recommendations of books focusing on Jesus might be helpful for someone like me. I will say that life was much easier when I suppressed my questions and my doubt.

  13. like a child - #19650

    July 1st 2010

    Mark from Christian doubt - I agree with you wholeheartedly, and encourage you to press on.

    DWDMD - I’m with you that many people just don’t care, but I do want to point out there are many people that do care, and have tried, and have walked the path away from Christianity of their childhood.  My heart particularly goes out to the people coming out of non-Christian backgrounds that are considering Christianity for the first time.  I think, particularly for scientists/academics, it would be very difficult for them to become Christians.  Francis Collins is an exception.

    Sam - I’ll refer you to this article.  http://blog.beliefnet.com/omeoflittlefaith/2010/06/is-the-church-the-best-place-for-doubters.html .  Although I’m sure there are good churches, they are a rarity.  Lately, I’ve been particularly burdened with communion and how non-Christians must feel during this time…should we be rejecting them communion…is this a sign of love, embracing doubt or unbelief?

  14. Mairnéalach - #19656

    July 1st 2010

    like a child—

    I urge you to read Ard Louis’s article
    http://biologos.org/uploads/projects/louis_scholarly_essay.pdf

    His words offer comfort to those who, like you, do not know what to make of miracles in light of their other learning. (The answer, it seems, is to keep learning!)

    On communion and unbelievers—wondering how unbelievers feel in the gathering when the bread and wine are distributed is certainly understandable. Yet—one must ask—if they’re unbelievers, why are they there anyway? If they find the cross to be of no use, why would a desire to eat of that Tree’s fruits be in them? Perhaps they need to make an impression or make a show of their spirituality? But Paul says he who would eat should discern the body… that is, the people gathered together. And why is that body gathered? To praise the cross. So—one who loves the bridegroom ought to love the bride. Hearts can’t be known with certainty, and boundaries can certainly be imposed with callousness by fallen men, but in light of a world which has become completely afraid of boundaries, it seems refreshing to me that one old body continues to peacefully observe a boundary which they claim not to have established themselves.

  15. Wyatt Roberts - #19667

    July 1st 2010

    Great article, Pete!

    I’m not so sure everyone experiences serious doubt. Many people avoid doubt altogether by simply refusing to consider questions that might prove to be unsettling to their current view. This is the approach a great many Christians take toward evolution. To them, certainty is synonymous with faith, and they insulate themselves from doubt by rejecting anything that will even remotely challenge what they believe. I think it’s really the result of fear, disguised as certainty and faith.

  16. eddy - #19671

    July 1st 2010

    “Look at faith; it leads to beliefs and doubts.  Belief: God exists.  Doubt: God does not exist.”

    Charlie, not exactly like that. In the real sense it is like this: Belief: God exists. Belief: God does not exist. Doubt: You don’t know which way is right and you are just confused at the core.

    I don’t know what does it mean to doubt when you are a Christian. If you claim to be a Christian and thus trained to put so much trust in the way of the Lord and in His Word, what is being hallowed here as benefit of doubt is in principle a kind of rebellion. Yes, Job was in period of terrible crisis and what was his response? “I know that my redeemer lives.” Yes, at one point King David felt like he was passing through the valley of death but what was his attitude? He says, he will fear no evil for he is quite certain God is with him. And what should be Christian attitude in the face of an all-out accusations that we are raving mad creationists because we hold God’s Word in Genesis to be true? Ah, we will remain certain God is not a man that he should lie.

  17. Mairnéalach - #19677

    July 1st 2010

    to eddy #19671

    You say “what should be the Chrisian attitude in the face of an all-out accusations that we are raving mad creationists because we hold God’s Word in Genesis to be true?”

    Actually, Eddy, I believe I can prove that you do not believe God’s Word in Genesis to be true. For example, do you believe there is a solid dome covering you, which admits rain to the surface by way of windows? No? Then, you too are an unbeliever.

    Of course I am using sarcasm. Neither you, nor me, believe God lies. However, you do differ with me in that you insist that highly stylized grammar and syntax, relayed as a vision (how else could Genesis have been communicated?) must be interpreted in a “plain sense” manner, whereas I believe this hermeneutic is only correct when dealing with the more journalistic-style portions of the bible. On the stylized sections, I search for spiritual meanings which uphold and reinforce the straightforward stuff, such as the multiple eyewitness accounts of the resurrection.

    Make yourself my enemy if your conscience really demands it, but if our Husband catches his Bride ripping off her big toe with her right hand, don’t be surprised if he takes some action.

  18. eddy - #19678

    July 1st 2010

    And someone above said and we creationists “insulate ourselves from doubt by rejecting anything that will even remotely challenge what we believe” which is kind of “fear” disguised as faith. I will say that is slightly true. Any kind of theory or philosophy that is being pushed to rise above what we know and believe about God will be rejected outright as false. And that is not being fearful. It is just that we find that particular philosophy or theory as flat-out senseless.

  19. eddy - #19683

    July 1st 2010

    Mairnéalach,

    I am quite certain even the strictest young earth creationist will not take every word of the bible to be literally true. I am not opposing you because you differently interpret Genesis the way I do. I oppose you because your hermeneutic is quite far fetched to destroy what we already know about God, about man and about Christ.

    We already know that every species were created by God and so blind natural selection must be outright rejected. We already know men are fallen creatures because somewhere sometimes ago they rebelled against God and need redemption through an absolutely perfect man to remedy the consequences of their fallen nature. Theistic evolutionism does not suggest that. We do know that Christ was the second Adam who did everything right. The first one, mentioned in Genesis did not get it right, but theistic evolutionism does not even believe Adam is as real as Genesis depicts.

    No matter how polite our husband is, he will not remain polite when he catch one of his bride in adultery of not taking his words and marriage covenant seriously.

  20. DWDMD - #19705

    July 1st 2010

    Like a child,
      I have never “solidified” my beliefs in all the tenets of traditional Christian doctrine (which does not include, by the way, literal interpretation of Genesis 1-3). But I have the “hope” and “trust” that the NT talks about so much. As I walk the walk, I honestly and experientially find that God gives me power to transform toward his likeness. I have enough faith to follow him (the “mustard seed”) and that faith is growing through my interaction with a living, real Presence. I suppose I would be classed as “liberal” (hate those labels) because I do have some doubts about even the Resurrection as a actual historical event (though the evidence of the apostle’s response afterward is pretty convincing) - while getting the deep meaning from it that physical death is not the end, that Jesus as God’s “Son” is the perfect Adam whom we should follow, that living for the ideals he demonstrated for us is our highest calling, that we must exist together as a body of believers. Most of all, I do believe in the incarnation of the divine spirit in the fully human Jesus. I believe that progressive revelation is still going on, as each era has to situate the Bible’s message for its own time.

  21. DWDMD - #19707

    July 1st 2010

    Evangelicals will not be satisfied by such a ‘wimpy” and probably incoherent set of beliefs, but they are what I honestly can hold and commit to. Through that commitment to follow the “Way” my faith is growing, and God is helping me daily to become a whole person - less self-absorbed and more concerned with his kingdom - though sometimes I can only see the changes he has made in me over the perspective of years.
      Thought you might be interested in another doubter’s story.
    diane

  22. Charlie - #19717

    July 1st 2010

    eddy,

    This is the central problem, words have multiple meanings.  Doubt can mean uncertainty or it can mean to distrust.  Was this whole paper about uncertainty then?  If it was, how does a religious person determine what is certain?  Again, all this conflict stems from the main problem, I have yet to find a religious person that can define truth and determine how they decide what is true, without being inconsistent in their methods.

  23. nedbrek - #19726

    July 1st 2010

    Charlie is 100% correct.  The Greek word translated “faith” is more like “trust” than “belief without reason or proof” (which is what atheists accuse us of).

    In this context, doubt is not the opposite of faith.  Distrust is.

    Doubt about ourselves, our faithfulness, our understanding - perfectly normal.

    Doubt about God, His Word, His faitfulness - ultimately, these are grounded in mistrust (we are calling God a liar).  These thoughts and attitudes need to go.

  24. eddy - #19728

    July 1st 2010

    Charlie, I read all of your posts and in all you ask the same question.  How do we “religious guys” determine what is true and what is not?

    I don’t know how to answer it correctly but I think there is no single way we determine truth of something. We have properly basic intuitive and deductive reasoning, experience, common sense, science, etc. At these, I think there is not much difference between me and you when it comes to the physical world. Much of our differences are really philosophical, or to put it more bluntly, religious. I look around and see all that I see, and my reasoning leads me to the certainty that God exists. Which God is true then? God of the Muslims or God of the Christians? Well, that is up to the debate between Christians and Muslims. But the first line has been already crossed: We acknowledge God exist.

  25. Mark Simons - #19739

    July 1st 2010

    Thanks for this post, Dr. Enns. I regularly struggle with doubt, but I have peace knowing that it is through doubting that God grants a stronger faith.

  26. Charlie - #19742

    July 1st 2010

    Eddy,

    What reasoning then leads you to the certainty that God exists?

  27. Sam - #19759

    July 1st 2010

    Like a Child -

    Thank you for the link.  Yes, I do think its true that many churches don’t seem to be too happy with congregants/parishioners who have feelings of doubt.  While it would be good to find a church that does treat doubt seriously, I also think other sorts of communities can be helpful in times like these.  For example, one might try to find a small group of friends to share things with honestly.  It really can be a great relief to simply talk with someone who’s willing to listen to what you have to say.

    My main point with brining up community is that, for many, doubt can lead to a loss of faith (just read Rachel Evans’ blog about her own faith).  While some may be able to get through doubt on their own, and even come out of it with a stronger faith in, and intimacy with, God, many find such times to be overwhelming.  I have had my own times of doubt, and I can say I don’t know if I’d be where I am now in life if not for the people around me.  I find it extremely important to let people know that it is all right to doubt, and that it doesn’t mean they’re losing faith; if anything, it might mean that their faith is wanting to grow.  However, sometimes we need help from others in finding that out.

  28. Merv - #19771

    July 1st 2010

    @Morriboy - #19572 who wrote: “Amen also. What is the Aslan quote?”

    Since nobody else seems to have answered you…

    I assume the quote was “further up and further in!” which was from “The Last Battle” when most everybody is already gathered into the “new Narnia”.  They are having a wonderful time exploring and then get the summons from Aslan to go “further up & further in”, so they begin their journey of joy meeting more & more old friends and, in fact then seeing Aslan face to face.  I love Lewis’ picture of paradise in this book.

    —Merv

  29. Martin Rizley - #19909

    July 2nd 2010

    It seems to me that the praise of doubt is a theme that one simply does not find trumpted in the New Testament.  What I see in the gospels more often is Jesus chiding His disciples for their “little faith.”  As long as Peter looked unwaveringly to Jesus, he was able to walk on the water towards Him; but the moment he took his eyes off Jesus and began to look around him, he began to sink.  No doubt, he began to rationalize his circumstances by thinking to himself,  “This can’t be happening!  It violates what I KNOW to be true about the properties of water!”  Did Jesus commend Peter for his “reasonable” doubt?  No, he said to him, “O you of little faith, why did you doubt?”  He likewise chided the disciples for their failure to believe He was really risen from the dead, by saying, “Oh, foolish ones, and slow of heart to believe all that the prophets have spoken?”  (LUke 24:25).  So it is seems to me that doubt should not be commended in an unqualified way.  Of course, when we have been taught falsehoods, we do right to doubt them.  Otherwise, how would anyone ever be converted to Christianity from false religions? (continued)

  30. Martin Rizley - #19916

    July 2nd 2010

    Those who are involved in false religions must doubt the falsehoods they have been taught to embrace the truth.  But the Bible nowhere commends people for doubting that which God Himself has revealed.  Of course, our understanding of God’s Word can be too simplistic; like Job’s friends, we can mistakenly think that if God has promised to bless the righteous, that means they will never suffer tragedy or loss.  Then a terrible blow comes along, and we are confused, because we do not know how to correlate our experience with an inadequate understanding of the Word of God.  Such confusion rightly drive us to question, doubt, and re-examine our interpretation of Scripture.  But that is a different matter than doubting the authority of Scripture, or the character of God.  There is nothing commendable about such doubting.  If there were, then Jesus would surely have modeled such ‘doubting’ for us. But there is no evidence that Jesus ever doubted the character of God; even when He felt forsaken by God on the cross, He still addressed Him as ‘my God’ and trusted in Him to deliver Him from the pit of suffering.

  31. Michael Thompson - #19984

    July 2nd 2010

    Martin,he didn’t just feel forsaken, he asked why he was forsaken. But anyway, I hear you on doubting truths about God, I always pray that the Lord would help me doubt less and to stay in fellowship with believers to encourage me. But doubt is just a fact of life, living in denial is not going to help me. Do you really think it isd just an act of the will, one can just stop doubting something any time he wants to? I doubt it! smile

  32. Martin Rizley - #20013

    July 2nd 2010

    Michael,  I do not believe we overcome doubt “just” by an act of will, but I believe that we must “will” to respond rightly to our doubts if we are going to come out of them.  We do not respond rightly to doubt by “glorifying” perpetual skepticism as a sign of spiritual health, maturity, and intellectual integrity.  If we do that, then we will regard those who have settled convictions about the faith as spiritually immature, naïve, or idolatrous;  we will see it as a ‘sin’ of presumption to be firmly convinced of anything, or to make dogmatic assertions about anything—and that cannot be right, for the apostles were most definitely dogmatic in their proclamation of the gospel!  We need to see doubt for what it is— as J. I. Packer points out, doubt (in the case of believers) is always a manifestation of “faith infected, sick, and out of sorts.”  The right way to respond to doubt is to confess our doubt to God, and that confession may involve “pouring out” in a very emotional way our confusion, hurt and pain to God.  We see this in the book of Job and in the prophet Jeremiah, where these believers expressed their faith in God by voicing their complaints to Him. (continued)

  33. Martin Rizley - #20014

    July 2nd 2010

    They told Him that they felt abandoned by Him; they asked Him why He was “against” them and why He was “assaulting” them so relentlessly.  They knew that they could not hide their feelings from God, so they expressed their feelings to Him.  This was actually an expression of faith, for had they really believed God was not listening to them and did care for them, why would they have bothered to address Him?  Their complaints to God were an example of “wounded faith seeking understanding.”  Packer gives wise counsel for helping doubters to ‘come out’ of their doubting.  He writes, “How can one help doubters? First, by explaining the problem area (for doubts often arise from misunderstanding); second, by exhibiting the reasonableness of Christian belief at that point, and the grounds for embracing it (for Christian beliefs, though above reason, are not against it); third, by exploring what prompts the doubts (for doubts are never rationally compelling, and hesitations about Christianity usually have more to do with likes and dislikes, hurt feelings, and social, intellectual, and cultural snobbery than the doubters are aware).”

  34. Norwegian Shooter - #20053

    July 2nd 2010

    “St. John’s great insight is that this dark night is a special sign of God’s presence,”

    How is this a great insight? You could replace “dark night” with “rainbow,” for instance, and not mean more or less. And it doesn’t explain anything and it doesn’t recommend anything.

    “When God seems most absent, it may be then that he is speaking to you most clearly.”

    Or it may be that God doesn’t exist. But even if you accept that the seeming absence of God could be “his” way of speaking to you clearly, doesn’t that mean that your own mind is filling in the space of “his” absence?

    In encouraging doubt as a way to “deepen” faith, can’t doubt itself become an idol and lead one to apophatism? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apophatic_theology

  35. Pete Enns - #20082

    July 2nd 2010

    Norwegian Shooter (why does that name make me nervous),

    I am not challenging your right to disagree, but there seems to be a disconnect here. It does not seem that you familiar with the contemplative tradition, am i correct?

    What I am describing here certainly has nothing to do with apophatism.

  36. like a child - #20089

    July 2nd 2010

    Maybe I’m mistaken, but I found the remarks below somewhat discouraging/judgemental.

    Comments from blog:
    On communion and unbelievers—wondering how unbelievers feel in the gathering when the bread and wine are distributed is certainly understandable. Yet—one must ask—if they’re unbelievers, why are they there anyway? If they find the cross to be of no use, why would a desire to eat of that Tree’s fruits be in them?

    But that is a different matter than doubting the authority of Scripture, or the character of God.  There is nothing commendable about such doubting

    J. I. Packer points out, doubt (in the case of believers) is always a manifestation of “faith infected, sick, and out of sorts.”  The right way to respond to doubt is to confess our doubt to God,

    (for doubts are never rationally compelling, and hesitations about Christianity usually have more to do with likes and dislikes, hurt feelings, and social, intellectual, and cultural snobbery than the doubters are aware).

  37. like a child - #20090

    July 2nd 2010

    I understand where the comments above come from - maybe they are Biblical and I’m just misguided.  Yet, it is exactly these sentiments that led me to “hide” my doubts for so many years.  In John 13:34-35 Jesus said “A new command I give you: Love one another. As I have loved you, so you must love one another. By this all men will know that you are my disciples, if you love one another.” Doubters should be included in this show of love right?  This article by Enns, and books like RH Evan’s are a step in the right direction.

  38. nedbrek - #20102

    July 2nd 2010

    But what is love?  If a man is walking towards a cliff, is it loving to be nice to him and see him on his way?  Or to tackle him to the ground?

  39. Norwegian Shooter - #20104

    July 2nd 2010

    Pete, no worries, the shooting part is pure personal embarrassment.

    No, I’m not familiar. Is it too complicated to get into?

    I just meant taken to extreme, praising doubt leads to valuing doubt itself. But you can ignore this extreme. What about my other questions?

  40. Pete Enns - #20157

    July 2nd 2010

    N.S.

    It is not complicated but it is different and deep.  I asked because the questions you raised suggested you might not be familiar. That is fine, of course. I just wanted to know where we were. I’ll try to answer your questions later.

    One thing to keep in mind is that no one is praising doubt. It is accepting it and being “in it” to see where God leads.

  41. learningaboutdoubt - #20207

    July 2nd 2010

    @nedbrek

    This may be true in some circumstances….i.e. you can physically tackle the man walking towards a cliff, but you can’t tackle doubt out of someone…..thus the point about meeting people where they are at with Christ-like love.  I don’t think “tough love” will work for doubts.  They are often necessary steps on the way to faith for many people, and may all be part of Gods plan to develop that person’s faith.

  42. Norwegian Shooter - #20226

    July 3rd 2010

    Pete, don’t bother with the contemplative tradition. My point is that a personal God is not leading you anywhere from doubts in your head. You are leading yourself out of doubts in your head. Here is a great post expressing my view: The Liminal Space of Intentional Not-Knowing. http://celestiallands.org/wayside/?p=304. (server seems to be down right now, but that is unusual.)

    Still interested in answers to the first two original questions.

  43. penman - #20286

    July 3rd 2010

    Norwegian Shooter:
    <<In encouraging doubt as a way to “deepen” faith, can’t doubt itself become an idol and lead one to apophatism? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apophatic_theology>>
    Pete Enns:
    <<What I am describing here certainly has nothing to do with apophatism.>>

    What’s wrong with apophatic theology? God’s essence is incomprehensible. When John Calvin & the Eastern tradition speak with a single voice on this, there must be something in it…

  44. nedbrek - #20292

    July 3rd 2010

    learningaboutdoubt, to some extent you can tackle the doubt out of someone.  If that doubt is keeping them from salvation, you can deliver the “bad news” of sin and God’s judgment.  That will prepare them for the Good News of salvation.

    I’m not a big fan of telling people to “Christian up”, but when it comes to doubting God, I think that is the best medicine.

    Our culture is enamored with doubt right now, this is not something we want to encourage.

  45. Sally - #21030

    July 8th 2010

    To Like A Child:  You were asking for some book recommendations.  I think you might like “Reaching for the Invisible God” by Philip Yancey, which is about, how can you believe in a God you cannot see, feel or touch.  Actually, just about anything he writes is useful. (I also like “The Jesus I Never Knew.”) He is not afraid to tackle subjects other Christian writers shy away from.

    This might seem obvious but if you have not read Francis Collins’ book “The Language of God” be sure to check it out.

    Finally, this one was given to me as a teenager in church when I was plagued by doubt.  It’s called “Know Why You Believe” by Paul Little.  You might find it too evangelistic but it is short and easy to read and answers questions like Is Christianity Rational? Is There a God? Is Christ God? Did Christ Rise from the Dead? Is the Bible God’s Word? Are the Bible Documents Reliable? Does Archaeology Verify Scripture? Are Miracles Possible?

    God bless.

  46. Greg Myers - #21499

    July 12th 2010

    Like a child writes

    (for doubts are never rationally compelling, and hesitations about Christianity usually have more to do with likes and dislikes, hurt feelings, and social, intellectual, and cultural snobbery than the doubters are aware)

    Sorry, but this is either remarkably condescending, or just plain silly.  Big picture, people have found faith in a wide range of conflicting religions.  Most faiths reject these other faiths as false.  This in itself should give any reasonable person pause.  Most religious texts are full or errors, and require elaborate rationalization to explain these faults away.  No one sect ends up being measurably different in morals or ethics than other religions, or non-believers.  The world is not as described by any religious text.  So far, nothing about life on earth requires a supernatural intervention or explanation.  It is not doubt that needs to be explained away, but faith.  Why, given the problem of evil, the failed promises, the missed timelines, the apparent absence of God is religion still flourishing?  To be fair, many, many pastors and church-goers have given up on faith a long time ago, and just don’t talk about it - doubt is really is not all that rare.

  47. like a child - #21508

    July 12th 2010

    Greg Myers - I didn’t write that quote - I copied it from someone else’s comments on this blog and noted that I found it judgmental and insensitive to people struggling with doubt.  Sorry that it wasn’t clear.  I didn’t want to single anyone out.

    Sally - thanks for the recommendations.  I have read Collins’ book (I met him once at a conference in 2002—before the book was written).  I was in grad school at the time and he was the first scientist I had met who was also a Christian (I didn’t know anyone in my university).

  48. Olumuyiwa Oluwasanmi - #22068

    July 16th 2010

    To Martin Rizley
    I learned a lot from your comments… As a believer of more than two decades and science grad student, I like your “Theological” approach to the issue of the believer and doubt. From scripture and my personal walk with him , I see doubt as an opportunity for clarification from the Lord. When our doubt begins to question the goodness of God or the reliability of his Word. Then we are in dangerous territory. As “he that comes to Him must believe that he exists and rewards those who diligently seek him”. The truth is we cannot really tell if the earth is old or young for sure. We would have to have been there at it’s creation to know that for sure 100%. As a believer, I believe our problem is understanding the implication of the existence of God and how that relates to us. Nothing we will ever discover or know will solve our main problem “sin” and it’s effects. Only God has the answers for that. Which is Jesus the Son.

  49. Martin Rizley - #22369

    July 18th 2010

    Olumuyiwa Oluwasanmi,
    Thanks for your feedback.  I agree with you that we need to distinguish between types of doubt, since doubt sometimes arises from misunderstanding, and sometimes from the perception that a particular interpretation of God’s Word is calling for re-examination or modification.  In that case, we are not so much doubting the Lord’s Word or His goodness, but our own inadequate understanding.    So we should never respond to doubt by simply ignoring it; rather we should take our doubts to the Lord in prayer and ask for enlightenment concerning the particular issue that is troubling or confusing us, confident that the Lord will give “wisdom” to those who ask Him in faith (even though our knowledge in this life will always be ‘in part”).  .

  50. Jason Brim - #22742

    July 20th 2010

    All I can say is WOW. Praise the Lord!

    • Add Your Comment

    • Science & the Sacred welcomes both critical and supportive voices in our comments section. However, please be sure to read our Ground Rules for Commenting before posting. We reserve the right to remove any comments we deem inappropriate.

    • You have 1250 characters remaining.