Origins News Roundup

Bookmark and Share

September 10, 2013 Tags: Creation & Origins, History of Life

Today's entry was written by the BioLogos Editorial Team. You can read more about what we believe here.

Origins News Roundup
Photo courtesy of Flickr user NS Newsflash.

Note: As we look to the future of the development of content on the BioLogos website, one of our goals is to connect more intentionally with other resources on the web. One way that we intend to do that is to devote a blog post every few weeks or so to pointing out news items, blog posts, and other content we’ve come across that may be of interest to our readers. Because the internet is a big place and we can’t cover it all, we welcome pointers of things you’ve stumbled upon. Submit those to info@biologos.org.

In August, the New York Times ran a series on their Room for Debate section called “Should Creationism be Controversial?”  There were seven short pieces responding to an article by technology journalist Virginia Heffernan, “Why I’m a Creationist.”  Topics ranged from biblical literalism, to faith in science, to the mode of discourse in a pluralistic society.  Among the responders were Karl Giberson, co-author of The Language of Science and Faith.

Creationism is making news in other countries too.  A new article in the Journal of the American Academy of Religion discusses the history and present status of creationism in Europe.

Astrobiology is the field of inquiry about the origin of life on our planet and the possibility of life elsewhere in the universe.  Making a comeback is the theory that life began on Mars and emigrated from there to Earth via meteorites dislodged by collisions with asteroids.  The thought is that the Martian atmosphere would have been more conducive to the assembly of RNA, DNA, and proteins—the building blocks of life—than the early Earth atmosphere was. 

Thomas Nagel is an atheist philosopher who is nevertheless critical of the dominant Neo-Darwinian paradigm of evolution.  His 2012 book, Mind and Cosmos: Why the Materialist Neo-Darwinian Conception of Nature is Almost Certainly False, received lots of criticism by the philosophical and scientific communities.  Here he summarizes his work and responds to critics.  Victor Stenger is a particle physicist and often counted among the new atheists.  He has written several books dealing with science and religion, the latest being God and the Atom.  He is interviewed here on the Huffington Post.

What’s God got to do with evolution?” is an article about Sarah Coakley, Norris-Hulse professor of divinity at the University of Cambridge and co-editor (with Martin Nowak) of Evolution, Games, and God: The Principle of Cooperation.

The Science Hour from the BBC includes an 8 minute segment about the ethics of sequencing genomes.

A video lecture from philosopher Mark Rowlands, best known for his books on his dogs, reflects on the possibility that animals can act morally.

A Muslim scientist makes the case that scientists should care about religion.

 



View the archived discussion of this post

This article is now closed for new comments. The archived comments are shown below.

Loading...
Page 1 of 1   1
Roger A. Sawtelle - #82596

September 11th 2013

It is good to hear about Coakley’s and Nowack’s criticism of Darwinism.

Why is BioLogos slow in discussing the results of a million dollar study?


Lou Jost - #82598

September 12th 2013

This is  a nice feature, which is very useful regardless of one’s perspective. Thanks!


Page 1 of 1   1