t f p g+ YouTube icon

One Step at a Time

Bookmark and Share

August 12, 2009 Tags: Design
One Step at a Time

Today's entry was written by the BioLogos Editorial Team. You can read more about what we believe here.

The diagram above shows the complex process of the human blood-clotting cascade, which requires the interaction of at least a dozen different proteins to properly work. The system is so complex that intelligent design proponents argue that it cannot be explained simply by natural selection (it is irreducibly complex).

On the surface, that argument seems to offer a strong challenge to evolutionary theory. After all, if even one of the needed proteins in the cascade is missing, the whole system falls apart. How could it have evolved over time, then, if each protein is necessary for the system to work? Wouldn't earlier versions have been useless and therefore not favored by natural selection?

However, in the case of the human blood-clotting cascade, recent evidence has shown that the system arose gradually over time, thanks to gene duplication. As Francis Collins notes in The Language of God, most of the components of the clotting cascade are related to each other at the amino acid sequence level. These similarities can be shown to reflect ancient gene duplications. Such duplications would have left a functioning version of the protein to serve its original purpose while at the same time allowing a new copy to gradually evolve to perform a new function. Over time, these small steps could converge into the complex system present in the human blood-clotting cascade.

Admittedly, we cannot precisely say the exact order of how the human blood-clotting cascade evolved. However, there is a difference between something being unknown and something being impossible.

Stay tuned to our blog and the BioLogos Web site in the coming weeks as we discuss in more detail the concept of irreducible complexity.

View the archived discussion of this post

This article is now closed for new comments. The archived comments are shown below.

Page 1 of 1   1
Rev. Scott Mapes - #52945

March 1st 2011

Just because we may be able to able to understand and explain the scientific origins and subsequent development of a process does not mean that we don’t believe in and admire the God who created the complex system.  This is a good response to the argument of ireducible complexity.

Page 1 of 1   1