t f p g+ YouTube icon

New Study Catches Speciation in Action

Bookmark and Share

July 15, 2009 Tags: History of Life

Today's entry was written by the BioLogos Editorial Team. You can read more about what we believe here.

New Study Catches Speciation in Action

Though an extremely important part of evolutionary theory, speciation has been notoriously difficult for scientists to observe in action. However, a new study published in the August issue of the American Naturalist has found that a single genetic change has sent two different populations of monarch flycatchers on the path to speciation.

The study, led by biologist J. Albert Uy of Syracuse University, looked at two populations of monarch flycatchers, a species of bird native to the Solomon Islands, which are east of Papua New Guinea. One species is found on the larger main island of Makira, while the other is found on the smaller surrounding islands, However, besides their different locations, the only noticeable difference between the two populations is feather coloration: one has all black feathers while the other has a chestnut-colored belly.

The scientists wanted to see whether the two populations had stopped exchanging genes -- a sign that these populations were on the road to speciation. Since tracking every member of both populations would be impossible, the team instead tested to see how mating males would respond to members of the other population. Monarch flycatchers actively defend their mating territories, and if a rival male enters, a fight often ensues. If males from one population attacked members of the other when they entered their mating territories, then clearly the two populations were still competing for the same mates and therefore still exchanging genes. If not, then the two populations were no longer inter-breeding.

The team placed taxidermy models into mating grounds and found that the males would attack the models of their own population, but seemed far less inclined to defend against the models of the other population. It seems, then, that these two populations are no longer competing for the same mates and are in most cases no longer mating. Thus, because they are no longer exchanging genes, their evolutionary paths are diverging, and speciation is occurring.

To further investigate, the team compared the genomes of the two populations to see what differences may have separated them. They found only one difference: the MC1R gene, which affects the color of skin and feathers, had changed between the two populations, which accounts for the difference in plumage. One genetic change was enough to cause a split between the two populations and move them towards speciation!

For more on the study, be sure to read the August issue of American Naturalist.



View the archived discussion of this post

This article is now closed for new comments. The archived comments are shown below.

Loading...
Page 1 of 1   1
Niall Bennington - #71545

July 31st 2012

I wonder if Creationist organizations are aware of these observed instances of speciation.

If they are, they undoubtedly denote it to ‘microevolution’.


Page 1 of 1   1